Sharepoint 2016 form with three PeoplePickers that each allow multiples within their respective field

I’m following this tutorial on how to setup a PeoplePicker and send the selected values via API.

My question revolves around a form that has 3 PeoplePickers on it. (Mgr, 2nd Mgr, and Assistant). The part of the tutorial that is confusing me is this section:

// Get the people picker object from the page.     var peoplePicker = this.SPClientPeoplePicker.SPClientPeoplePickerDict.peoplePickerDiv_TopSpan;   

Since I have three different people pickers, how do I keep track of which People Picker has which person selected? Do I define three different PeoplePickers in that section of code? Something like:

// Get the people picker object from the page.     var peoplePicker1 = this.SPClientPeoplePicker.SPClientPeoplePickerDict.peoplePickerDiv1_TopSpan;     var peoplePicker2 = this.SPClientPeoplePicker.SPClientPeoplePickerDict.peoplePickerDiv2_TopSpan;     var peoplePicker3 = this.SPClientPeoplePicker.SPClientPeoplePickerDict.peoplePickerDiv3_TopSpan; 

That just doesn’t seem right.. especially because of this code a few lines later…

// Get information about all users.     var users = peoplePicker.GetAllUserInfo();     var userInfo = '';     for (var i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {         var user = users[i];         for (var userProperty in user) {              userInfo += userProperty + ':  ' + user[userProperty] + '<br>';         }     }     $  ('#resolvedUsers').html(userInfo); 

I appreciate any help suggestions on how to tackle a form with three peoplepickers on it.

Can we allow the comment section inside the “Discussion Board” list to show more than 20 replies

We have added a Discussion Board list to our sharepoint online classic team site. enter image description here

Currently when we click on a discussion item, the main view for each discussion will show maximum of 20 replies, and then it will show a paging link as follow:-

enter image description here

but most users miss this paging and think that the discussion only contain 20 replies. so can i expand the replies section to show more than 20? using the UI or using PnP script to?

Would Ventriloquism into a silence field allow you to cast silently?

I know Ventriloquism is an arcane spell and silence divine, so normally most people wouldnt be able to cast both without needing magic items or such.

But if you were to use Ventriloquism to throw your voice into a silence field, would that work? You are still casting the spell, its just that Ventriloquism makes it seem like its coming from somewhere else.

Does a multiclassing with the Master of Many Styles and Free Style Fighter allow more active stances at once?

Both Master of Many Style and Free Style Fighter allow the character to use several stances in the same time. If a character has, for example, 3 levels as Free Style Fighter and 1 as Master of Many Style, how would these features work?

The wording of the Free Style Fighter doesn’t seem to mention something about it:

At 3rd level, a freestyle fighter can freely mix two of the styles he knows into a more flexible style. A free-style fighter can have an additional style feat stance active simultaneously with his first style feat stance. He can enter all of his allowed stances as a move action or one stance as a swift action.

The description of the Master of Many Style seems to have more restrictions (emphasis mine):

At 1st level, a master of many styles can fuse two of the styles he knows into a more perfect style. The master of many styles can have two style feat stances active at once. Starting a stance provided by a style feat is still a swift action, but when the master of many styles switches to another style feat, he can choose one style whose stance is already active to persist. He may only have two style feat stances active at a time.

In this context, I don’t know if the bold statement is only a difference of wording to track the Master of Many Style progression, so should be considered separately from the other archetype, or if this limit should prevent the multiclassing with the Free Style Fighter archetype.

Does the feat Mobile Spellcasting allow movement when casting during a grapple?

If a character is engaged in a grapple and has the feat Mobile Spellcasting (Complete Adventurer, p.111), are they allowed to make a grapple check to perform the Move action alongside their spellcasting?

Mobile Spellcasting reads, in-part:

You can make a special Concentration check (DC 20 + spell level) when casting a spell. If the check succeeds, you can cast the spell and move up to your speed as a single standard action.

Facebook does not allow sharing link to my blog

I try to share my blog in my business page.
Facebook says the link cannot be shared because it violates the community rules.
If I put another link it works.

The blog itself is legit and there is no problematic content.

I reported to facebook and they said the content is approved but still the sharing does not work.

Why is it blocked by facebook?
Is it related to the content or the URL (for example .info is not accepted?)
What can I do to be able to share it?


What spells below spell level 6th from ANY spell list allow for protection from harmful effects from hostile plane environments?

I am playing a 5th-level character in a campaign, planning to advance through the chameleon prestige class from Races of Destiny.

We are being heavily hinted at needing to go to the plane of a greater deity in the future, most likely at a much higher level. One of the effects of the plane is that if you are not of Lawful Good alignment, you must make a Fortitude save every minute or be disintegrated. Drastic, I know.

Avoid planar effects, found in Manual of the Planes, Planar Handbook, and Spell Compendium, is the only spell in any spell list I can immediately think of that would prevent us from being obliterated if we so happen to be there. Are there any other spells that we should know and prepare before our journey? With the chameleon class, it is possible to grab any spell from any spell list so I am not afraid of going into the obscure books here, like Book of Vile Darkness’s demonologist has a Transmutation-school greater bestow curse at 4th level for example.

Allow non-root user to use some Docker commands

I have a user restricted, and the user can only access its own files. It is a non-root user, and so, therefore, cannot use Docker (doing docker run foo => docker: Got permission denied while trying to connect to the Docker daemon socket...).

I want to allow this user to create their own Docker images from only their file space, and only be able to delete/rmi their own images that they have made. Furthermore, they will only be able to run their own images and stop their own image containers.

From the questions I have read, the only way for this to happen is to add a root user to a group the non-root user is in, making a huge vulnerability risk.