Why can’t I select alternative Working Languages in Term Store Management Tool?

I tried to create a multi-lingual term sets for a SharePoint Online Team Site following this guide. When trying to change the working language all options are grayed out and I can’t select them. Same goes for the other locales option. Under Site Settings > Language Settings the default language is English and all Alternative Languages are enabled. What do I have to do, to add another working language?

Any help would be greatly appreciated, Thanks

enter image description here

Is there an alternative to HPKP for dyndns?

For dyndns it’s fairly easy to replace the machine behind a domain name: either if the subscription runs out or if the IP changes and the dyndns service hasn’t been updated. In that case one can trivially request a new valid certificate with letsencrypt.

I have so far used HPKP to avoid this situation. Since HPKP is now a persona non grata, which alternatives exist?

Wikipedia mentions Expect-CT but that also doesn’t help in this case.

Alternative to public-facing website

We currently use a public-facing website (set up years ago) to allow members at my workplace the ability to login with their Microsoft accounts, upload their documents, and make blog posts for the public to view.

Since public-facing websites have been discontinued and will be expiring, is there any alternative service that will provide a similar kind of functionality? We provide members with Microsoft accounts so keeping a system as similar to what we currently have is fairly important.

Compiz: Fixed window placement, which alternative?

At login two windows are automagically opened. For the purpose of fixed location of these, I am trying CompizConfiguration Settings Manager, function Place Windows. The Fixed Windows Placement tab gives me three choices: Windows with fixed position, Windows with fixed placement mode, and Windows with fixed viewport.

What is the difference between these alternatives? I have tried to find an explanation, but miserably failed. Any light on the matter is gratefully received.

See also 1.

Alternative way to represent to open or close a dropdown?

I’m doing some animation icons for a recent product and I’m playing with some alternative to the standard dropdown toggle. Typically, it’s a arrow pointing either down or up…

Is there any reason to not have it a chevron down and then an X icon to close? Would this impact any user expectations or the web standards / what people are used to?

Here’s an example of what I’m suggesting: https://codepen.io/brycesnyder/pen/XWWbZEz

enter image description here

Alternative To YouTube

I have a YouTube Channel …. But sometimes it gets a bit irritating – When for some reason, YouTube decides that one of your videos is in tos violation – and deletes it. It doesn't happen often – But it does happen from time to time, And it always seems to be a video that you really like!

My Question is this – Suppose I have a Landing Page — And I include a Video on the page. Instead of Linking to a YouTube video – Is there some sort of Online Video Storage website that I can Link to a…

Alternative To YouTube

Why does the numerical inverse laplace function FT for small times give erroeous results and what is the alternative

I am trying to do the numerical laplace inverse of a very complicated transfer function, subject to a trapezoidal pulse input. For the sake of understanding, I will use a simple transfer function to pose my question. I want to find out the output value during pulse on times, but numerical laplace inverse gives highly erroneous results for such time scales. Here is the pulse input that I am givingenter image description here

The mathematica code is the following:

Gtransfer[s_] = 1/(1 + s); T1 = 10^-9; T2 = 10*10^-9; T3 = 10^-9; Eo = 1;  Eint[t_] = Eo*10^9*t; Enet[t_] =    Eint[t] - Eint[t - T1]*UnitStep[t - T1] -     Eint[t - T1 - T2]*UnitStep[t - T1 - T2] +     Eint[t - T1 - T2 - T3]*UnitStep[t - T1 - T2 - T3]; Eins[s_] = LaplaceTransform[Enet[t], t, s]; fun1[s_] = Eins[s] Gtransfer[s];  thisDir =    ToFileName[("FileName" /.        NotebookInformation[EvaluationNotebook[]])[[1]]]; SetDirectory[thisDir]; << FixedTalbotNumericalLaplaceInversion.m t0 = 25 10^-9; Vnumerical = FT[fun1, t0](*Numerical*) Vanalytical =   N[InverseLaplaceTransform[fun1[s], s, t] /. t -> 25 10^-9](*Analytical*) 

You will find that for values of t0<12*10^(-9), numerical inverse laplace is extremely erroneous. Could anyone suggest me as to why this is so and how to fix this? My original transfer function is just too complicated to invert analytically. Thanks in advance!

Alternative for ADAL in SharePoint hosted app

Is there any alternative for ADAL. I have created SharePoint hosted app. For every new build app deployed with new url with new Id like

https://mysite-a08081eeabb935.sharepoint.com/sites/test/myApp

For the authentication token I need to go to the application in Azure Active Directory and have to add the reply url. It is ok but for every new build i have to change the reply url.

I want to publish app in office store, If client install app in their environment then app url will change then How can I fetch url from their environment.

Finally I have to add reply url of app in AAD for authentication. I want solution so that for all customer the url will be same or may be an alternative for adal Is there any possible alternate way to resolve this issue?

Alternative to Docker that is less restrictive for maintaining package dependencies

I work on robotics on ROS running with Xenial, but this applies to any application running on Ubuntu. With a team of engineers, its rather hard to keep everyone’s test station uniform in package versions. A while back, we had a testbed break completely since a new update/upgrade changed much of a package functionality.

I want to avoid this and have a solution that allows me to duplicate these testbeds with ease.

I realize that Docker is the popular solution for this, but the container solution is a little bit too restrictive for my needs. I don’t mind reinstalling drivers and etc and I’m finding it cumbersome to deal with Docker specific issues in getting my original testbed running(especially as it requires multi-containers).

Is there a solution available that can achieve my needs without going as far as a container like Docker?

The dumb method would just be clone my entire testbed…maybe that’s still the best for me?