Using apache mina for ssh using signed ssh-rsa-cert-01 from Certification Authority

There is an existing client configured and running (SshClient) using apache mina to ssh to one of our internal jump boxes. It currently uses PEM based authentication. Due to compliance we have to switch to using internally signed certificates (internally we are using hashicorp vault as a CA). I’m unable to find any documentation regarding how to use signed certificates for ssh in apache mina to start with. Is it not supported? Will I perhaps have to use any other java ssh library?

High Authority Tech Site – Making $700+ profit/mo – Huge Potentials

High Authority Tech Site – Making $ 700+ profit/mo Fast Growing Tech Site Making $ 8988+ revenue/year from Adsense & Paid Posts | Detailed Articles | Organic Traffic from US & UK | Huge Opportunities.

High Authority Tech Site – Making $ 700+ profit/mo Fast Growing Tech Site Making $ 8988+ revenue/year from Adsense & Paid Posts | Detailed Articles | Organic Traffic from US & UK | Huge Opportunities.

Seller's Notes
Business Description

This is a website that…

High Authority Tech Site – Making $ 700+ profit/mo – Huge Potentials

What is the benefit of public Certificate Authority when using SSL mutual authentication?

I was working the other day and I had a question come up, that I want to ask here to make sure my assumptions are correct.

In terms of SSL Mutual Authentication a self signed CA and a public CA provide the same functionality, is that assumption correct?

Besides the part that, supposedly, a public CA is stored much more securely than a private CA, the functionality part is the same, right? Meaning the client will be able to communicate with the server only if both of them have the certificates issued by the same CA and the server has access to the CA, right?

So in this situation, the man-in-the-middle attack is only possible of the attacker has access to the self-signed CA, correct?

And if all of the above assumptions are correct, what is the benefit of using a public CA for ssl mutual authentication? Is it only that it’s stored very securely or is there also something else?

Any help is greatly appreciated, thank you!

How to generate a CSR (certificate signing request) for creating a limited CA (Certificate Authority) with LibreSSL?

Related to this (too broad) question: How to implement my PKI?

I have a self-signed CA (ca0)

I would like to create a CA (ca1) with limited power derived from that first CA. ca1 should only be able to sign certificates for *.foo.com and for foo.com.

From this question, I found out that the Name Constraints extension is probably what I want.

The key for ca1 is already created and is ca1.foo.key.pem.

I already have an incomplete command for creating the request:

libressl req -new -sha512 -key ca1.foo.key.pem -out ca1.foo.csr.pem 

What should I add to that line to limit ca1’s power to what I want?

Best Web 2.0 by Domain Authority

Here is a recent ranking of Web 2.0 classified by Domain Authority:

99- Blogger.com   
94- Wix.com   
94- Fandom   
93- Weebly.com   
93- Tripod.lycos.com   
93- skyrock.com   
93- Over-blog.com   
93- Goodreads.com   
93- Academia.edu   
92- WordPress.com   
92- Livejournal.com   
92- Last.fm   
92- Kinja.com   
92- Flickr.com   
92- Evernote.com   
91- Yola.com   
91- Rediff.com   
91- Hubpages.com   
89- ucoz.com   
89- Soup.io   
89- Diigo.com   
88- Tumblr.com   
88- Simplesite.com   
88- Pen.io   
88- Myanimelist.net   
87- Webs.com   
83- Wikidot.com   
83- Shutterfly.com   
80- Dailystrength.org   
79- rhizome.org   
79- Fotki.com   
77- Smore.com   
77- Jimdo.com   
77- Bravenet.com   
75- Edublogs.org   
75- Blogsome.com   
74- Travelblog.org   
74- Couchsurfing.com   
73- https://www.squarespace.com/ Squarespace.com
68- Sitew.com   
68- hpage.com   
66- Areavoices.com   
58- Postach.io   
58- Cabanova.com   
54- inube.com   
50- Webnode.com   
48- Webstarts.com   
48- Ampblogs.com   
46- Devhub.com   
44- Websitebuilder.com   
34- own-free-website.com   
23- spruz.com   

Is a low Domain Authority bad for backlinks?

I know that a rating of “domain authority” is a bit subjective and different engines can have different parameters.

But let’s say I have a newly created website for my aunt. It is new and has NO authority whatsoever.

On a page like moz.com, it has the lame authority of 0.

Two questions:

  1. Is it bad to put a backlink on my aunt’s webpage pointing at my website: “Website designed by my beloved nephew example.com”? It could be just neutral, not good but not bad.

  2. But then it comes the second question, Imagine some backlinks from spammy websites can be attacking my website. Is there any way to find harmful websites with some kind of negative domain authority?

Related questions: Is page authority or domain authority more important for backlinks?

How to identify spammy domains giving backlinks to my site (to submit in disavow links in WMT) (but links on this answer are no longer active)

DentistSay – Premium High Quality Dentist Authority Website

Lucrative Dentist Authority Niche With 100% Hand-Crafted Content Do You Want To Dominate the Dentist Niche With 100% Hand-Crafted Content

Lucrative Dentist Authority Niche With 100% Hand-Crafted Content

Do You Want To Dominate the Dentist Niche With 100% Hand-Crafted Content

Click Here To View The Website ==> http://dentistsay.com

Over 17,60,00,000 people search with this keyword "best dentist” , that mean there huge people…

DentistSay – Premium High Quality Dentist Authority Website

Possible public/private identity recovery after compromise without a centeral authority?

I’ve been thinking about P2P systems using asymmetric keys and wondering if there is anyway to recover an identity in the event it was compromised using some kind of web-of-trust.

This seems to be a large issue compared to a regular system (using a central authority) that can remove the intruder’s access and restore control of the account to the real owner (Digicert, facebook, twitter, etc…).

What if a master key was generated and used to create a subkey. Then using 16+ random bytes the master keys private component could be encrypted. The owner could choose 5+ nodes on the network (friends?) to store parts of the secret and erase it’s knowledge of those bytes.

The subkey would be the user identity (with it’s own AES password protecting the private part). Should this client get phished, forget their password, or someone steal their sub-key private component, we could use the peers to restore the master key and revoke this subkey.

I’m not sure how this would work other than the client sending a request to each node and them verifying the client though some out-of-bands way (phone call? Text?) before sending their part of the master key password.

Would this work? Are their any existing solutions to this problem?

Do 300 high pr authority SEO backlinks, link building for $15

In this gig i will create 300 High Pr Authority Backlinks Link building.If you want to rank your site on google so you need to build Authority SEO backlinks. Google love High pr SEO Backlinks. Order now for manual SEO Link Building Service for your Website. WHY ME? 100% White Hat Link Building 48 Hours Express Delivery Login Data Provide Natural Backlinks

by: contestExperts
Created: —
Category: Link Building
Viewed: 218