The Eldritch Maul ability says:
each of your melee attacks with a weapon or an unarmed strike can reach a target up to 15 feet away from you, as inky tendrils launch toward the target. In addition, your melee attacks deal an extra 1d6 force damage on a hit.
So, let’s say that I’m using the Eldritch Maul ability with a normal shortsword to melee attack a target that is 15 feet away. Is it only the inky tendrils that hit the target, dealing just 1d6 force damage, or should I also factor in the 1d6+STR/DEX piercing damage of the shortsword as if it hit the target as well?
Follow-up question: If the weapon was magical, would its magical properties factor into the attack?
For example: Would your attack with the Eldritch Maul ability benefit from a +1 weapon?
In another example: Would a Dagger of Venom’s poison property proc on a melee hit from 15 feet away while using the Eldritch Maul ability?
Dagger of Venom says:
You can use an action to cause thick, black poison to coat the blade. The poison remains for 1 minute or until an attack using this weapon hits a creature.
Shadow Sorcerer’s Hound of Ill Omen feature’s text reads:
…Additionally, while the hound is within 5 feet of the target, the target has disadvantage on saving throws against any spell you cast. The hound disappears if it is reduced to 0 hit points, if its target is reduced to 0 hit points, or after 5 minutes.
I’m curious if against any spell you cast refers to the action of casting the spell, or the condition of having been a spell that you cast in any tense.
The difference being that a spell like Hold Person would only get disadvantage on the first saving throw with the first interpretation, but on all following saving throws with the second interpretation.
The only comparable feature that I know of is Heightened Spell, a Sorcerer metamagic, that reads:
When you cast a spell that forces a creature to make a saving throw to resist its effects, you can spend 3 sorcery points to give one target of the spell disadvantage on its first saving throw made against the spell.
This feature is clear in its intent, that only the initial saving throw against any spell is affected and given disadvantage.
The lack of clarification on Hound of Ill Omen makes me wary of which way to rule.
I remember when DM’s Guild first came out there were some concerns regarding the licensing terms you agree to when uploading homebrew content. At first it seemed like you granted ownership of your IP to WOTC. It seems like they’ve since clarified that in their FAQ.
Does Wizards own any unique IP that I create in my DMs Guild publications?
Wizards does not own any of the unique IP that you create in your publications. Wizards does own the IP that they contribute, plus the DMs Guild agreement will grant Wizards and other DMs Guild authors a license to use your IP.
That said, if your work merits incorporation into canon, Wizards will contact you about purchasing your IP outright.
Although they don’t really specify what “a license to use your IP” means, I haven’t been able to find any information on how licensing works for D&D Beyond. The Terms of Service link at the bottom of the page links to Twitch’s TOS, which don’t mention D&D Beyond.
I was wondering whether there has been announcements on what kind of license is granted to WOTC when you upload homebrew content to D&D Beyond, is it similar to DM’s Guild?
I’m trying to figure out if there is a way to search the DnD Beyond spell interface that force movement (e.g pushing and pulling)
There doesn’t seem to be a way to search for that though, or anything else in the spell text.
How can I search for these kinds of spells?
I’m considering making a new language based on SQL SELECT statements to allow users to export CSV data in the manner they please. I’m confident in being able to interface this with a permissions system by inspecting the resulting AST from parsing before turning it into a SELECT statement to execute, so I’m not really concerned about this leading to unauthorized data access.
This language would be pretty much a 1-to-1 mapping of SQL SELECT statements, except for a few changes regarding joins and a few other things.
Users are relatively few and can be easily traced and contacted. It’s not the public at large.
The underlying DB would be MariaDB.
What should I be concerned about from this idea? If it’s a bad idea, why?
I thought about the possibility of making a query that doesn’t terminate by using
WITH RECURSIVE, so I’m not going to support that syntax, and I made the following question at the DBA SE to see what other ways a SELECT statement could be non-terminating (I thought of a few more while writing that question):
What are all the ways that a SELECT statement could be made to not terminate or take a very long time?
Besides that, is there anything more? Any particular risk? Is it possible to make some type of resource bomb with it, to consume all memory for example?
Access to this language could be put under a permission so only very privileged users could use it, but I wonder if that’s needed.
Recently, I discovered this on D&D Beyond, Legends of Runeterra. It appears to have some new subclasses included.
On the one hand, this is on D&D Beyond, but on the other hand, there’s no officially released books as far as I know.
Is this anything official, or is this essentially just D&D Beyond’s homebrew?
So, if I create a Master Tier account on D&D Beyond I can share the Monster Manual and other digital assets with players. If I purchase (say) Hoard of the Dragon Queen on Beyond, can the players view all the module details through the interface? Is there any way to limit their access to the module info?
There is a Compendium Content Only option on that same page. Exactly where does that fit in? Is that just the content that should be shared with the players?
Long time AD&D player, pondering 5th Edition. The digital options are intriguing.
I want to run Lost Mine of Phandelver online. I’ve looked at Roll20.net and D&D Beyond. Both sites sell the module for the same price.
My understanding is that Roll20 is a “tabletop”, whereas D&D Beyond is more of a digital “compendium.”
What are the trade-offs for purchasing an adventure module in Roll20 versus D&D Beyond?
Can content be shared / imported between the sites?
Would there be a reason to purchase the module on both sites?
Is there a common practice for using the two together?
The death ward spell states:
[…] If the spell is still in effect when the target is subjected to an effect that would kill it instantaneously without dealing damage, that effect is instead negated against the target, and the spell ends.
One example of such an effect would be failing a third death saving throw. Ordinarily you would die immediately after failing your third death saving throw but this is not the case for the Zealot Barbarian currently Raging Beyond Death:
You still must make death saving throws, and you suffer the normal effects of taking damage while at 0 hit points. However, if you would die due to failing death saving throws, you don’t die until your rage ends, and you die then only if you still have 0 hit points
So what happens if the Barbarian has three failed death saves and then their Rage ends?
What instantaneously killing effect is the Barbarian being subjected to?
What exactly is negated by death ward?
Is the third death saving throw removed?
In Xanathar’s Guide to Everything, the Path of the Zealot gives a barbarian the “Rage Beyond Death” ability at level 14 (emphasis mine):
Rage beyond Death
Beginning at 14th level, the divine power that fuels your rage allows you to shrug off fatal blows.
While you’re raging, having 0 hit points doesn’t knock you unconscious. You still must make death saving throws, and you suffer the normal effects of taking damage while at 0 hit points. However, if you would die due to failing death saving throws, you don’t die until your rage ends, and you die then only if you still have 0 hit points.
RAW, this says that regardless of your death saves, if you receive healing before the end of your rage and have 1 HP, you remain alive regardless of the outcomes of your death saves.
Is that the case? And is that RAI?