## Bulk SMS,Bulk SMS Delhi,Bulk SMS Provider Delhi,Bulk SMS Company Delhi-|

The present market is furiously focused. Everybody wants to be on the top. The marketing systems likewise have changed with time. Presently the advertisers are making use of computerized innovation to contact the general population in a flash. You can follow the development of advertising through digital methods. However, the current digital methods are not accessible for all of the users; this is where bulk messages…

Bulk SMS,Bulk SMS Delhi,Bulk SMS Provider Delhi,Bulk SMS Company Delhi-|

## How to bulk remove certain category from product catalog

I publish content for a merchant, and I want to bulk remove one category from multiple categories assigned to products. I saw there are some answers to help on developer side but not any to solve this as backend user.

## Bulk SMS,Bulk SMS Delhi,Bulk SMS Provider Delhi,Bulk SMS Company Delhi-|

Hind IT Solution has been entered in IT business and dedicatedly providing IT solutions to small and medium businesses worldwide. We believe in principle that Hind IT Solutions can only grow up if we deliver IT solutions to customers that will help them to develop their business.

http://www.hinditsolution.com/index.php

## Stored procs fine tuning for processing bulk data – 5 million records

I have the below procedure which is used for bulk upload data from a temporary table (temp_rules_master) into two other related tables.

It has 5 million records. The actual 5 million records to temp table upload take less than 10 mins.

But later the below procs takes around 10 hrs for running through all those 5 million records and do the processing.

Is there any way to improve the speed?

Stored Procedure:-

``DELIMITER $$DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS load_rules$$  CREATE PROCEDURE load_rules() BEGIN     DECLARE finished INTEGER DEFAULT 0;     DECLARE groupname,starting_material_code,lower_limit,higher_limit,description,severity,active,create_date,created_by VARCHAR(255);     DECLARE cur CURSOR FOR SELECT r.groupname,r.starting_material_code,r.lower_limit,r.higher_limit,r.description,r.severity,r.active,r.create_date,r.created_by from temp_rules_master r;     DECLARE CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND SET finished = 1;      OPEN cur;      read_loop: LOOP         FETCH cur INTO groupname,starting_material_code,lower_limit,higher_limit,description,severity,active,create_date,created_by;          IF finished = 1 THEN              LEAVE read_loop;         END IF;          /* Checks if an error already exists for the groupname */         IF (SELECT ce.id FROM compatibility_error ce WHERE ce.code=groupname) THEN             /* if exists use the existing error */             BEGIN                 SELECT ce.id INTO @ERROR_ID FROM compatibility_error ce WHERE ce.code=groupname;             END;         ELSE             /* If no error exists for the groupname create a new error record */             BEGIN                 insert into compatibility_error(active,create_date,created_by,modified_by,modified_date,code,description,severity)                      values(true,create_date,0,0,NOW(),groupname,description,severity);                 SET @ERROR_ID=LAST_INSERT_ID();             END;         END IF;          /* Checks if starting material exists */         IF (select id from starting_material sm where sm.code=starting_material_code) THEN             BEGIN                 select id INTO @SM_ID from starting_material sm where sm.code=starting_material_code;             END;         ELSE             BEGIN                 SET @SM_ID = null;             END;         END IF;          /* Insert rule */         select UPPER(md5(UUID())) INTO @CODE;         insert into compatibility_rule(active,create_date,created_by,modified_by,modified_date,code,description,groupname,higher_limit,lower_limit,compatibility_error_id,starting_material_id)              values(true,create_date,0,0,NOW(),@CODE,description,groupname,higher_limit,lower_limit,@ERROR_ID,@SM_ID);         END LOOP read_loop;      CLOSE cur;      select 'done...'; End\$  \$    DELIMITER ; ``

## SQL Server Bulk Insert vs Python SQLAlchemy Bulk Operations

Apologies if this belongs in a different StackExchange forum.

I’m being tasked with building out an ETL process and the current adhoc ETL Python script is using SQLAlchemy to do bulk insert operations into a SQL Server hosted on AWS via RDS. My understanding is that RDS doesn’t support Bulk Insert so I’m trying to understand what the difference is and how does one work and not another. Can anyone help explain?

## Pre-define bulk upload settings or prompt the user to choose their settings each time they upload

The scenario is a user has organised a bunch of folders and files which will be stitched together to form a book online. The idea is users will be able to drag & drop / click to upload all of these files and folders at once, rather than doing them individually.

Added complexity: users structure their files and folders differently which often calls for custom import settings. There’s 3 key settings that vary depending on the user and the book they’re creating.

1. Create a chapter per file (very common setting turned on)
2. Number chapters (useful for majority of users)
3. Remove leading numbers (users will add numbers to their folders / files to create a custom order, for example “01__My First Chapter” will be ordered before “02__Bees can fly”.

When a users first creates a book, it’s significantly likely they’ll stick to the upload settings they’ve defined as that’s how they’re structuring the book in their file management system.

I have two workflows I’m having difficulty deciding between. One pretty seamless, the other adds a layer of security / validation of how things are being imported later down the track.

1. Let the user pre-define their bulk import settings, and from that point on any files that are uploaded will inherit those properties. This can be changed manually in a separate options menu, but when the user uploads their files, they upload and are modified instantly to match your import settings. To me this would be a seamless approach so the user can add any additional files in the future and they’ll be presented as they’ve defined. However some situations might call for NOT creating a chapter per file as they’re being uploaded and would mean the user would have to update their settings beforehand in order to ensure they’re uploaded how the user expects. Or upload files individually and just re-order / change them if necessary.

2. We could still do some pre-defined settings when a book is initially created and empty, however in the future if the user wants to upload multiple files, we provide the user the ability to configure their import settings before starting the upload. What I don’t like is that this introduces an additional step when uploading files in bulk instead of a seamless interaction like google drive.

Would be keen to hear your thoughts. Originally I wanted to have it so you could seamless upload whatever content you wanted, and could configure the presentation easily later on if needed — however due to the dev infrastructure it would be a significant effort to do this.

I’ve found it difficult to find examples of bulk import settings / configuration as you’re uploading — usually it just starts and that’s how it is so this is a kind of unique workflow.

Cheers.

## Pre-define bulk upload settings or prompt the user to choose their settings each time they upload

The scenario is a user has organised a bunch of folders and files which will be stitched together to form a book online. The idea is users will be able to drag & drop / click to upload all of these files and folders at once, rather than doing them individually.

Added complexity: users structure their files and folders differently which often calls for custom import settings. There’s 3 key settings that vary depending on the user and the book they’re creating.

1. Create a chapter per file (very common setting turned on)
2. Number chapters (useful for majority of users)
3. Remove leading numbers (users will add numbers to their folders / files to create a custom order, for example “01__My First Chapter” will be ordered before “02__Bees can fly”.

When a users first creates a book, it’s significantly likely they’ll stick to the upload settings they’ve defined as that’s how they’re structuring the book in their file management system.

I have two workflows I’m having difficulty deciding between. One pretty seamless, the other adds a layer of security / validation of how things are being imported later down the track.

1. Let the user pre-define their bulk import settings, and from that point on any files that are uploaded will inherit those properties. This can be changed manually in a separate options menu, but when the user uploads their files, they upload and are modified instantly to match your import settings. To me this would be a seamless approach so the user can add any additional files in the future and they’ll be presented as they’ve defined. However some situations might call for NOT creating a chapter per file as they’re being uploaded and would mean the user would have to update their settings beforehand in order to ensure they’re uploaded how the user expects. Or upload files individually and just re-order / change them if necessary.

2. We could still do some pre-defined settings when a book is initially created and empty, however in the future if the user wants to upload multiple files, we provide the user the ability to configure their import settings before starting the upload. What I don’t like is that this introduces an additional step when uploading files in bulk instead of a seamless interaction like google drive.

Would be keen to hear your thoughts. Originally I wanted to have it so you could seamless upload whatever content you wanted, and could configure the presentation easily later on if needed — however due to the dev infrastructure it would be a significant effort to do this.

I’ve found it difficult to find examples of bulk import settings / configuration as you’re uploading — usually it just starts and that’s how it is so this is a kind of unique workflow.

Cheers.

I am redoing the bulk upload programs that I initially created a few years ago. This is an example of the new design I have come up with. Note that this is a desktop app written in a framework that is very old and legacy.

When you click on the View Errors/View Warnings buttons, another window will open that displays the errors/warnings.

The grey box on the right will contain messages that inform the user about the status of their upload (e.g., 15 rows have been checked, 4 have errors and 2 have warnings…blah blah.)

Does this design make sense? I am not a UX person, so feedback is greatly appreciated.

## Bulk Upload Interface and Flow

I have a bunch of desktop applications that do bulk uploads (they allow users to upload data from a spreadsheet into a database). The bulk upload programs do data validation, as incorrect data being uploaded would be costly to the busies.

If there are any errors in the user’s file, the program reports the errors and makes the user fix the errors before being able to proceed with the upload.

Question 1: Should the bulk upload program stop the user from proceeding until the errors are fixed, or should it automatically proceed with the upload but only with the valid rows?

Question 2: The users have asked for a new feature — warnings. So these are things that shouldn’t stop a user from proceeding but things that the user should be aware of before proceeding. Should I force the user to acknowledge the warnings before proceeding, or should I just show the warnings and allow the user to proceed without any friction?

Question 3: Should I display warnings and errors in the same grid, or should the warnings and errors be displayed in different grids?

## Bulk Package, 259 Domains, Most Populous Cities In US, ThingsToDoIn.. All .com

Why are you selling this site?
I'm selling all 259 of my ThingsToDoIn… .com domains. They are for the most populous cities in the US. They are all .com. I'm selling them for an average of \$ 150/each. The average estimated value for each by GoDaddy is \$ 296.81 with a total estimated value of \$ 76,875. I have owned these domains since 2010 and made a ton of money from them. I'm selling them to move on to other projects. I have owned them since 2010.

ThingsToDoInRaleighNC.com is…

Bulk Package, 259 Domains, Most Populous Cities In US, ThingsToDoIn.. All .com