What’s a good comparison of different OSR Systems?

I’m looking to play a retro clone or something that is similar to old style D&D, but with the rules smoothed over a bit.

I’m seeing LOTS of different systems and it’s a bit daunting.

Some attributes I’d like to compare, to give you an example:

  • randomly spawning monsters?
  • random monster attitudes towards the players?
  • random treasure
  • random diseases
  • random etc…
  • inventory management: weight? slots?
  • player reviews
  • popularity / size of community
  • what is the max level / how long to recover from player death
  • are all encounters beatable?
  • how is armor class calculated?
  • are there dungeon turns?
  • light management
  • hex-crawl rules / overworld travel rules
  • reaction rolls
  • number of skills
  • death at 0HP vs stabilization rolls
  • magic system mechanics

Is there a comparison chart that can help me compare lots of different systems?

Cozshopping.com Price Comparison Site and Shopping Search Engine

Why are you selling this site?
I need quick cash for emergency family reason

How is it monetized?
Affiliate programs (cj.com and shareasale.com) and also Amazon associates.

Does this site come with any social media accounts?

How much time does this site take to run?
Since 2015

What challenges are there with running this site?
Hosting fee. Cozshopping.com need good vps or dedicated server to run it to the max.

X.509 – How Is Certificate Chain of Trust “Subject Name”-“Issuer Name” Match Comparison Made?

I keep reading that in an X.509 certificate chain of trust that the "Issuer Name" in a certificate that has been signed by the Issuer must "match" the "Subject Name" of the Issuer’s certificate. Exactly how is this match determined? Do all of the RDNs (Relative Distinguished Names) have to match between both the Subject Name and Issuer Name or is the match determined solely by the RDNs that are present in the Issuer certificate’s Subject Name, or is some other match algorithm at work?

Amazon Affiliate Massage Chair Comparison Website

Why are you selling this site?
Need some urgent funds.

How is it monetized?
amazon affiliate program, this is a starter site so has not earned any and has no traffic.

Does this site come with any social media accounts?

How much time does this site take to run?
1-2 hour a week

What challenges are there with running this site?
not much any one with a basic understanding of website can run this with ease.

Online Fax Services Comparison – Why You Should Always Compare Before Buying

We have all been there, bought a produc  ARGENTINA FAX BROADCAST LISThttps://www.faxlistb.com/argentina-fax-broadcast-list/ or service only to find out later that it did not measure up to our expectations. Most times if we’re lucky, the purchased item can be returned and we are fully refunded. However, we have still wasted a lot of time and if you’re running a business, time means money. That’s why everyone should make it their own personal policy to totally compare and research a service or product before they buy.
That goes doubly true for a long term service like online fax. Usually, once you have received your fax number and start sending it out to all your contacts, you have made a commitment of sorts to having the service long term. You simply must do a little homework to make sure you get a service or provider that won’t disappoint you or your company down the road. Now that we have the Internet, that’s relatively very easy to do.
For those who are new to these types of services, it should be stated that Internet or online fax is simply using your present email account and your web connection to do all your faxing. You get a local or toll-free number which is connected to your email address, once you get a fax, you receive an email with the fax attached. Basically, you’re hiring the services of an online provider who will handle all your faxes in exchange for a small monthly fee. These web based fax services are paperless, very efficient, totally portable and much cheaper than conventional methods of faxing.
While some services do let you “port” your fax number, it’s best to pick the right provider the first time around. So you need to do your due diligence and carefully examine the different plans and different providers to meet your needs. One simple way to approach this problem is to just compare the different providers. Just compare some basic factors of each provider on your list to come up with the one best suited to meet your needs.
These factors would include: quality of the overall service, pricing, overage fees, amount of online storage, length of storage, support hours, number of email addresses, any hidden fees, set-up fees, corporate plans or services and whether or not the service has a free trial? All valid questions you should ask before signing up to any one of these providers.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6878262

Does mentioning Product Identity-protected things in a comparison violate the OGL?

I have a homebrew setting that involves a heavily-modified cosmology. None of my planes are identical to the "standard" planes, and the re-used names are only generic ones with heavily-modified meanings. In fact, the only two with identical names are the Astral Plane and the Abyss.

I would like to publish (on a wiki, and potentially more formally) a concordance of sorts for players more familiar with other cosmologies. Basically, a table mapping my_plane to closest standard_plane(s). This would be both for mechanical purposes (any spell that says it involves the <y> standard plane instead uses the <x> custom plane) and for thematic shorthand (generally, beings who live in the <y> standard plane live in <x> custom plane instead).

Can I, without violating the OGL, actually do this by referencing the actual WotC-published, stock-5e-cosmology plane names? If that’s all I do with those names is mention them (without any of the details)?Or is there another sane, understandable way of accomplishing this same task without risking an OGL violation?

From what I can tell, this would fall under nominative fair use as defined in the link:

Nominative fair use permits use of another’s trademark to refer to the trademark owner’s actual goods and services associated with the mark. Nominative fair use generally is permissible as long as (1) the product or service in question is not readily identifiable without use of the trademark, (2) only so much of the mark as is reasonably necessary to identify the product or service is used and (3) use of the mark does not suggest sponsorship or endorsement by the trademark owner.

Comparison of tagged units

Consider this data set:

BNikkei = {{10.0032, 27 Days}, {10.0527, 22 Days}, {10.1283, 18 Days}} 

from a recent question, “More effective way to apply a function in one member of a pair ..”

How to get Select[ to work for #[[2]] < 22 Days? I tried:

Select[BNikkei, #[[2]] < (22 Days) &] (* {} *) 

Units in MMA are a great convention. I can’t seem to find too much in manuals, on this situation. Unless, I have to derive comparison functions, for my own types??? Thanks in advance.

If site provides MD5 to check file, can’t the comparison string also not be modified?

I am new to this so please bear with me. I was downloading a VM image and I was told to check the MD5. Naturally, I did but wondered,

If a hacker would change the file to be downloaded from the site, wouldn’t the hacker also be able to change the checksum on the site to make the file look genuine?

If this is the case, wouldn’t this defeat the purpose or is the checksum not really meant for hackers but only problematic downloads over a network?

Comparison of feature importance values in logistic regression and random forest in scikitlearn [closed]

I am trying to rank the features for binary classification, based on their importance using an ensemble method by combining the feature importances estimated by random forest and logistic regression. I know that logisticregression coefficients and random forest feture_importances are different values and Im looking for a method to make them comparable. Here is what I have in mind:

X=features y=lablels rf=RandomForestClassifier() rf.fit(X,y) RFfitIMP=rf.feature_importances_/rf.feature_importances_.sum() #normalizing feature importances to sum up to 1 lr=LogisticRegression() lr.fit(X,y) lrfitIMP=np.absolute(lr.coef_)/np.absolute(lr.coef_).sum() #Taking absolute values and normalizing coefficient values to sum up to 1 ensembleFitIMP = np.mean([featIMPs for featIMPs in [RFfitIMP,lrfitIMP]], axis=0) 

What I think the code does is to take the relative importance from both models, normalize them and returns the importance of features averaged over two models. I was wondering whether it is a correct approach for this purpose or not?