The DM and I have worked it out, so it’s a bit moot, but I’d still like the community’s opinion on whether or not this homebrew feat is balanced for D&D 5e.
Inspiration taken from:
Sentinel (PHB 169)
Slasher (TCE 81)
(Sorry, feats not in the SRD)
This is for my lvl4 halfling barbarian; he has a STR of 17, so I really really want that sweet +4 mod, but taking the attr bonus is ‘boring’ to me. The purpose of this feat is to give him some more battlefield control (a la Sentinel; plus he took the Wolf Totem option at lvl 3), while also limiting the instances he can ‘do the thing’ (a la ‘Slasher’ feat)
Here’s what we came up with:
- Increase your Strength or Dexterity by 1, to a maximum of 20
When using ONLY a melee slashing weapon* (with or without a shield):
- When you use your Reaction to hit a creature with an Opportunity attack: if you don’t have disadvantage, roll a second d20– if the second d20 would also hit, reduce the creature’s speed to 0 for the rest of the turn.
- If a creature you attacked on your most recent turn makes an attack against a target other than you, you may use your Reaction to make an attack against that creature
*we wanted to underline that this feat only works with slashing weapons, but not prevent a flaming axe or shields
As a GM, I strive to make the best experience for my group and adapt and improve my style and skill. I usually do this by live observation and asking for inputs after the session.
My problem lies in after session Q&A. Usually I ask them “Do you have fun? Which part is fun? Which part is not fun? How can it be better?” and they answer generally “Yep, it was fun. I like every part of it. I think it’s fine.”
I don’t want to look for problems that aren’t there, but I feel like I’m not improving the group’s experience this way. There are some parts where they are distracted enough to play with their phone – they are not engaged enough, so it’s obvious I can change some things, like pacing, so they can enjoy the session more.
I want my players to give feedback on every session. How to make them do so?
I’ve tried to make the questions as guiding as possible and as brief as possible, but they stick with the general “it’s fine”.
I have recently joined this forum. I was just curious about design thinking and I started searching about it on Google. Can somebody give me more insights on it? Like, I saw somewhere this question: “What are some balanced critiques of Design Thinking?” Please explain comprehensively.
Keto Tone FranceLe plan de régime céto. Cette nouvelle stratégie de perte de poids tight clamp à transformer votre corps en cétose afin de vous permettre de faire fondre votre graisse supplémentaire en tant que source d’énergie au lieu de sucre. En conséquence, votre gestion du poids pourrait être bien meilleure que jamais! Pourtant, le supplément Keto Tone France est-il la formule la in addition to efficace pour obtenir les résultats souhaités? Cliquez sur la bannière ci-dessous pour le découvrir avant qu’il ne soit trop tard pour perdre du poids! https://walgreensdiet.com/keto-tone-france/ https://www.facebook.com/KetoToneFrance/
Which makes no longer viable the transport of blood to the the frame of the penis. Sildenafil, it's the active substance of the steering Eroxel prix for potency, Viagra relaxes the blood vessels, for this reason enhancing blood go with the flow certainly so guy is able to spend the delight of sexual intercourse shelf lifestyles of Viagra . According to the final clinical check, accomplished via researchers on the Karolinska…
Most critiques are divided among immoderate excellent