How to deal with a DM that doesn’t listen to or cooperate with his co-DMs?

We are a group of five who rotates DMing with each quest. We have one DM who only does what he wants when he’s DM, with no regard for other players, other DMs, or the rules, which forces the next DM in the rotation to scramble to salvage what is left from his quest. This one DM’s quests consistently leave the PCs a mess in terms of advancement, items, and forced changes. We’re trying to figure out what to do about this situation.

That’s the short version.

The long version

Ok, so, a little backstory, and sorry for the length of the rant, it’s kind of an urgent problem.

Me and 4 of my friends have recently started playing DND 4e, and it’s been very fun. Only one of us, let’s call him Tom, has actually played before, but it was the 3.5 system, and even though we picked him to be our DM, he was very bad, so we all decided to be DMs, each making a quest of their own, and then we would rotate, and it worked well at first.

Problem is, there’s this one guy, let’s call him Tim, who, while being a relatively ok DM, and while having a semi-interesting story, also gave horribly OP items (there was one where you take HP off of yourself, and then blast it around in a 5 square, and one that grants you resistance to all damage) and OP monsters (we’re lvl2, the monster had 150HP, 1d10+5 dmg, but somehow AC 13? and there were only two of us against it), which are not balanced with anything, not with our level, nor are their stats balanced between themselves.

Tim spends a lot of time playing video games, and believes that DnD is just like one, that you can quickly lvl up just by killing enough goons and using enough coins, and then buying things that are useful. He thinks items are useless if they don’t deal 10 dmg, which goes against all rules, and refuses to actually read Adventurer’s vault or Mordenkainen’s to see whether there is an item with the same powers. When his quest was finished, he refused to take the items off, and half of them were either “soulbind” or were actually a skill that some ancient order taught us. The problem is obviously that now John and I have to completely re-devise our quests to accommodate his OP solutions.

As for monsters, he of course wants us to fight a god or an epic hero every week, because it is, of course, not fun at all if the monster is normal, even though he knows I almost killed the whole group using just 5 wolves. He then justifies his OP items by saying that it is our reward for killing the OP monster of the week, without realizing that the OP monster itself is the problem! When my friend and I, let’s call us Jack and John, told him there are no solo monsters on lvl 2, and that we just jumped a level (in two sessions), and would jump another even if John does absolutely nothing in his campaign, he just told us that then we should lower the xp amount we get from the solos.

He thinks the story isn’t interesting if there’s no dying, and no gods, and is constantly devising new ways to be “stronger than anyone else”. We don’t know whether he’s to lazy, or just not capable of actually devising a story that makes sense, without resorting to crude methods of raising the tension such as character death, and does not see a problem in that. His newest quest, he hints, will involve traps that might kill us immediately, and while that is totally ok, his quest seems to consist only of said traps and, of course, op monsters. He also always comes up with ways to block our abilities, or take them away because it suits him (for example he makes a monster that is completely magic proof, rendering our wizard useless, or just limiting our choices in a way that’s not game-compliant), but of course throws a hissy fit if John or I try to remove an out-of-this-world item.

He even made a God of evil, stronger, of course, than any other God in existence, and then had him like us (?!) and give us gifts, which turned us neutral evil, even though we tried to explain to him that we don’t want to be evil, that it doesn’t matter that we’re neutral, and that there’s no way for an item that’s not legendary to affect us that way.

Tim also seems to hate the rules (everyone hates the rules, but they’re there for a reason), and has started inventing his own. For example he invented a “dodge” system, which no one understands, not even him, and which would only be used by him, and only some times, and sometimes not. His system is so arbitrary that not even he knows what he’s doing, and where he has used it and where not, leading to constant arguing.

Tim justifies his new “better” rules by saying he’s “bending” them. Well, John and I, being the nerds we are, pulled out our ye old Player’s handbook, and DM guide, and read them cover to cover, and nowhere did it state that creating a whole new game constitutes bending. It has come to the point of us allowing him some small changes, so we can limit him on the big ones, but the small changes are somehow more annoying, as is his constant whining about something not being logical or realistic (because we’re not playing a game where a character gets run through by a sword, and gets 5HP dmg)

We, of course, tried talking to him, and explaining that he has to think things through, that he can’t just undo his mistakes by doing something even more questionable (he now has 2 persons in one body, a dragonborn paladin, and a genasi something, which he is able to change every day or so), and that we are not comfortable playing something so unconnected with DnD. He completely ignored us, or worse, didn’t get the point at all, playing stupid, and making us debate him on some small things until we come to the point where we contradict our first intent, because what he has planed is much worse. Tom, also, seems to want to follow in his footsteps.

Our question is this: How do you deal with such a DM, as a player and a fellow DM? Is there a way to keep him down, because if we throw him out, then Tom and Angelo also go with him, and while we will do it, it’s kind of our last option. Can you give us some arguments to support our wanting a single DM (to which Tim will most certainly not agree)?

We have googled it using every phrasing we can think of (and John is a literal Google Guru), but most of the solutions given seem to be: “Talk to him, make sure he understands, he will be reasonable”. Problem is, he isn’t reasonable, and with us being 2:2 (Angelo doesn’t count since he doesn’t care), it’s kind of starting to be more trouble than it’s worth.


The dilemma about starting a new game with just one DM is featured on reddit so if you have any arguments supporting just one DM, it would be much obliged!

How do I deal with a problem player overstepping their boundaries in a 1-on-1 campaign? [on hold]

I’m GMing a 1-on-1 campaign (it’s all homebrew, by the way). My player likes to weigh in on what’s happening, and sometimes oversteps her boundary into GMing territory. I let it slide a lot, since it doesn’t affect the plot much if at all and adds some character to the story.

In this particular game, she works for some agency and is tasked to infiltrate this grand palace in a foreign state and investigate the king because of some human rights violations. The problem is that it’s definitely a monarchy and it’s ruled by a long line of dragons (who can change to human form), and they kill anyone they wish.

When she infiltrated the temple, she worked her way up to being maid for the king. Through some investigation and kidnapping, she found out that the “king” is actually the king’s sister; the actual king is attending a college secretly because it is highly against tradition to go to higher education, so the sister is pretending to be her brother.

The people found this out via a god that is secretly pulling the strings of the whole operation, and they tried to kill the royal family, who escaped with my player’s character. The PC recommended to them that the people probably hate them so much they should probably give up power and become a democratic state; her brother hates that idea, but my PC demands it.

When my PC didn’t get her way, she snapped him away to be a prisoner with her father, who the player apparently decided was a super powerful “Deus Ex Machina” character (she’s just a vampire, by the way). I talk to the player outside the game and let her know that she can’t really decide that, and we continue.

Since the people found out, they rioted; apparently my player decided, “Nope, that’s all gone in a week, and a democratic government forms, and it’s all happy flowers and sunshine.” So I’m planning on her brother going full silver dragon (which it’s been established he can do) and just kill-switching everyone to show my PC who’s the GM.

In short:

I feel like my PC is trying to run the campaign and I’m considering just kill-switching everyone and her character. I’m a bad and new GM, so if anyone with experience can tell me how to deal with this better than just killing everyone, I’d like to know.

How do I deal with a GM trying to kill me (D&D 5e)

so I’ve just recently started a new campaign with my friends. Now, the GM is using the realm of Tal’Dorei (as well as other Matt Mercer-inspired things as he’s a fan.)

However, our group had previously managed to have ONE session but due to complications considering how large the group was I doubt we’ll be able to continue with that campaign again.

The character I used for this campaign was a knight (link here: https://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Knight_(5e_Class)).

Now, in the new campaign that we’re starting I WAS going to change my character to a Totem-Warrior Barbarian and the GM supported this idea. However, once I learnt that my friends were not going to be changing any of their characters at all I decided to stick with my knight. (That character is brothers with one of the other characters)

Now, this might be considered metagaming but my friend informed me that our GM is going to purposely try and get my character killed so that I’ll use the Totem-Warrior Barbarian. He doesn’t know that I know though, and personally when he uses the words “It’s up to you which character to use” but is going to try and get that character killed to get what he wants I don’t see that as very fair.

So what I would like in terms of answer to my question; is how do go about being as DIFFICULT TO KILL AS POSSIBLE?

Our party consists of Five Members including myself.

-Me, a knight.

-An Aasimar Fighter who will be going into the Eldritch Knight subclass

-A Dragonborn Bard

-A Yuan-Ti Warlock

-And a *Tiefling(?) Gunslinger (using this version of the class: https://www.dndbeyond.com/subclasses/gunslinger)

*I don’t actually know what race his character is so I need to find out next game.

Now, I understand that approaching our GM about the issue would be the much more reasonable way to settle this problem but let’s be honest…. where’s the fun in that?

Any tips or advice would be much appreciated. I’m fine with multiclassing or whatever. Thanks for taking the time to read this.

-Bipu

How to best deal with the automatic ratings from songs in iTunes?

I hate how my Smart Playlists show songs that are unrated in my Smart Playlists which are often 2 or 3 stars or greater.

This site won’t let me make suggestions on how to deal with this, or post a reply or add a comment…so I’m answering my own question.

My solution is to:

  1. Highlight the songs that are “unrated”
  2. Right-click and choose “Dislike”
  3. Edit your Smart Playlist
  4. Add an additional rule selecting “Love”
  5. Select “Is Not” and “Disliked”

I will be keeping all of my songs Disliked if Unrated. There’s a 1/2 rating option I seen but I prefer this way because these unrated songs are Disliked until I decide to rate them anyway.

best deal for submit your website to 500 bookmarks for $4

Hi, Welcome to DON1988 I will submit your website in TOP 500 Pr Directories MANUALLY. This service is available for USA / UK / CA/ AUS, Other than above countries, Please contact before place order SERVICE FEATURES !!100% Manual Work, NAP Constant for ALL Citations.The duplicate will check for every listing All Directory submission / Citations from Local IP address[/*]100% Customer Satisfaction[/*]Niche-specific Directory Sites[/*]Full Report With Login Details.Quick response, 24/7 Lifetime support WHY YOU BUY THIS SERVICE? ADVANTAGES !! ☝ Organic traffic will be driven to your website. ☝ It will give you qualified leads since people from your geographical area will be directed to you. ☝ These listings help you to beat your competitor. ☝ Enhance your visibility on major local search results. ☝ Create Permanent Backlinks.

by: don1988
Created: —
Category: Directory Submission
Viewed: 397


How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

The team I’m in creates components that can be used by the company’s partners to integrate with our platform.

As such, I agree we should take extreme care when introducing (third-party) dependencies. Currently we have no third-party dependencies and we have to stay on the lowest API level of the framework.

Some examples:

  • We are forced to stay on the lowest API level of the framework (.net standard). The reasoning behind this is that a new platform could one day arrive that only supports that very low API level.
  • We have implemented our own components for (de)serializing JSON, and are in the process of doing the same for JWT. This is available in a higher level of the framework API.
  • We have implemented a wrapper around the HTTP framework of the standard library because we don’t want to take a dependency on the HTTP implementation of the standard library.
  • All of the code for mapping to/from XML is written “by hand”, again for the same reason.

I feel we are taking it too far. I’m wondering how to deal with this since this I think this greatly impacts our velocity.

How to deal with multiple address layouts

I am facing a small UX obstacle, that is related on how to handle address layouts for different countries. We are building basically a sign up process, that asks the user to enter their country of residence. On the next step the user then has to enter their address details. The input fields on this page need to adjust to the standard address layout for the users country of residence.

Is there a smart way to design a uniform address layout that feels natural for users basically anywhere on earth? (Street, No., Zip Code, City)

[Download] Dandrew Media (Sal Buscemi) – Commercial Deal Maker Mastery

[Download] Dandrew Media (Sal Buscemi) – Commercial Deal Maker Mastery

This high level exclusive training gives you everything you need to become a highly paid deal maker, intermediary, and consultant.
Attract as many clients and investors as you can handle. You’ll get all the tools and strategies to.

– Analyze and structure deals
– Raise unlimited capital
– Find the most profitable properties
– Launch a massively lucrative commercial deal making…

[Download] Dandrew Media (Sal Buscemi) – Commercial Deal Maker Mastery