Does Blood Biography depend entirely on the target’s knowledge?

In the Pathfinder setting, hags and worshipers of Gyronna sometimes replace babies with changelings. I’m considering an adventure in which the PCs defeat a Gyronnan cult and find a kidnapped baby in their lair. This raises the question of how the PCs can find the family of a pre-verbal infant.

One solution I’ve considered is the spell Blood Biography. However, looking over the text of the spell, I’m not sure it would work (important parts highlighted):

You learn the answers to a specific set of questions about a creature so long as you have access to at least one drop of its blood. You can cast this spell on the blood of the living or the dead, but living or undead creatures are entitled to a Saving Throw to resist the spell. You can cast the spell on dried or fresh blood. Once you cast the spell the answers to the following four questions appear on any flat surface you designate (a wall, a piece of paper, and so on).

  • Who are you? (The name by which the creature is most commonly known)
  • What are you? (Gender, race, profession/role)
  • How was your blood shed? (Brief outline of the events that caused its wound, to the best of the victim’s knowledge)
  • When was your blood shed?

These answers always appear in a language you can read even if the creature cannot speak that or any language.

Clearly, the answer to the question “How was your blood shed?” depends on the target’s knowledge. However, the same text isn’t present for any of the other questions. So the question is, does the baby have to know its own name in order to answer “Who are you?”

The phrasing “The name by which the creature is most commonly known” makes me think that it doesn’t matter if the baby knows her own name. However, I’m not sure because spells like Speak with Dead definitely do depend on the target’s knowledge.

How do the balls maximizing the maximal function depend on their centers?

Let $ \mu$ be a finite Borel measure on $ \mathbb R^N$ and let $ f\in L^1(\mu)$ be a non-negative function. Let $ M_\mu f$ denote the maximal function of $ f$ relative to $ \mu$ , i.e. $ (M_\mu f)(x)=0$ if $ \mu(B(x,r))=0$ for some $ r>0$ and $ (M_\mu f)(x) = \sup_{0<r<\infty} \frac{1}{\mu(B(x,r))} \int_{B(x,r)}f \, d\mu$ otherwise. (Here $ B(x,r)$ denotes the open ball of radius $ r$ centered at $ x$ .)

Suppose that $ a>0$ and $ K\subset \mathbb R^N$ is a compact such that $ M_\mu f > a$ on $ K$ . Then for each $ x\in K$ there exists $ r_x>0$ such that $ $ \frac{1}{\mu(B(x,r_x))} \int_{B(x,r_x)}f \, d\mu > a. \tag{1}$ $

Question. Is it possible to choose for each $ x\in K$ the radius $ r_x>0$ in such a way that (1) holds and the mapping $ x\mapsto r_x$ is continuous or at least Borel?

This question is inspired by another recent question about Besicovich type covering theorem.

Must this upper bound on mixing time depend on the minimum stationary probability?

It is known fact that for a finite-state, reversible and ergodic Markov chain with transition matrix $ M$ , the following control on the mixing time holds

$ $ \left( \frac{1}{\gamma_\star – 1}\right)\ln{2} \leq t_{mix} \leq \frac{\ln(4/\pi_\star)}{\gamma_\star}$ $

where $ \pi$ is the stationary distribution $ \pi M = \pi$ , $ $ \pi_\star = \min_i \pi(i),$ $ the mixing time is defined by $ $ t_{mix} = \min \{t \geq 1 : \sup_{\mu} \|\mu M^{t-1} – \pi\|_{TV} \leq 1/4\},$ $ and the absolute spectral gap $ $ \gamma_\star = 1 – \max \{\lambda_2(M), |\lambda_d(M)|\}.$ $

Is the upper bound tight on all the parameters ? Specifically, is the dependence on $ \pi_\star$ generally known to be necessary ?

Does software architecture depend on framework being used?

When I was building my backend API I used Django combined with django-rest-framework (DRF) because it was the easiest and fastest way to create what I needed.

And I haven’t thought about an architecture of it.

And if I understand correctly DRF provides some kind of Model-ViewSet-Serializer pattern.

So my question is: Is making decision what architecture would look like based on framework being used wrong?

Magento 2 create admin form selected option depend on another selected option

I have created an module for admin which have admin form and this form have some fields.I have two select option drop down fields.If I choose first dropdown option value then second drop-down display some values and if I choose another option then value should be different.

I have search on forums but not found any solution.Please help me.

screenshot are attached.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Does the law of a Feller process depend continuously on the initial condition?

Let $ E$ be a locally compact and separable metric space, and suppose $ X$ is a Feller process with transition function $ P_t$ . To be precise, let $ C_0$ denote the space of continuous functions vanishing at infinity, suppose $ P_tf\in C_0$ whenever $ f\in C_0$ , and $ $ \sup_{x\in E}|P_tf(x)- f(x)|\rightarrow 0$ $ as $ t\rightarrow 0$ .

Let $ P_x$ denote the law of the process started at $ x\in E$ . It is stated on page 625 of this paper that the laws $ \{P_x\}_{x\in E}$ are continuous in the space of cadlag paths with the Skorohod topology. A more general question is very briefly discussed here, however I’ve been to unable to find a reference.

Do you know of a book or paper where this is proved?

Does the radius of spirit guardians depend on the size of the caster?

The spirit guardians spell states:

Spirits float around you up to 15 feet away.

Certain other spells like antilife shell state:

A barrier extends from you in a 10-foot radius and moves with you.

Does this mean the range of spirit guardians is affected by the size of the creature who casts it since they are up to 15 feet away from you? Or is the 15 feet based upon your centre of mass so to speak?

Does probability depend on order?

Let’s say I have a playlist of 20 tracks ordered by artist name. The songs’ titles don’t matter.

1) Rihanna 2) Rihanna 3) Rihanna 4) Rihanna  5) Moby 6) Moby 7) Moby 8) Moby  9) Rammstein 10) Rammstein 11) Rammstein 12) Rammstein  13) Eminem 14) Eminem 15) Eminem 16) Eminem  17) Beyonce 18) Beyonce 19) Beyonce 20) Beyonce 

And then I shuffle that playlist. So now it’s like:

1) Moby 2) Rihanna 3) Beyonce 4) Rihanna 5) Eminem 6) Rammstein 7) Beyonce 8) Rihanna 9) Rammstein 10) Rammstein 11) Eminem 12) Moby 13) Moby 14) Eminem 15) Rammstein 16) Eminem 17) Moby 18) Beyonce 19) Rihanna 20) Beyonce 

And the question is: in which case I have more chances to play 2 or 3 Moby’s track in a row if I would randomly pick a track form a list? In other words: does shuffling a shuffled list gives you more chances to get 2 or more items of a same kind?