I am trying to understand the logic of this algorithm so i can implement my own but i am not understanding this diagram i see appearing many times in a fair few articles on the topic, i am teaching myself so i don’t have a computer science degree to help. But i understand the general idea behind the algorithm.
But this butterfly diagram is confusing me.
How do you interpret this diagram from left to right mathematically speaking? It’s so confusing.. what are the arrows telling me to do in terms of math operations on the functions?
I would like to ask regarding the following diagram where the receiving MTA is reaching its own DNS to verify the sender’s X.509 cert. Is this always the case for DANE? Can’t he query the sender DNS for that?
I am not a database engineer, I am just getting started with designing data models.
User registers to my application. My application has
Funds that are predefined with an
InvestmentStrategy. A user deposits cash into their account
Bankroll. A user invests from their
Bankroll into a
Fund or multiple. A fund buys into
Picks to guide the
InvestmentStrategy uses historical
Pick evidence by
User to determine which
Investments to make.
Results, which pay
Users based on performance. A
User can leave a
User can withdraw from their
InvestmentStrategy can also pay percentage of profit to
This leads to a wide array of circular relationships. I am having a hard time drawing an ER diagram describing the entities and relationships above. Does anyone have examples or suggestions for how to create their model? Thanks!
I need to show on a diagram a unique constraint involving two attributes. For example, UNIQUE(COLA, COLB).
This is what I have done:
I can’t figure out what is wrong with my solution and why does it differ from book’s solution. I think the only thing that matters is the previous state of A so that there should be two states, one for previous A=0 and one for previous A=1. Where am I mistaken? I would really appreciate any explanation.
An IB question requests: Construct the logic diagram for the Boolean expression NOT A OR B AND C.
looks to me like not A or (B and C), whereas what I expected only gets partial credit. Can someone explain?
I was doing my homework and I am confused on what I’m doing, it can’t be that straightforward. I’m making a mistake somewhere. I tried looking for practice problems but they don’t cover my issue either, I’m still confused. What will be the pictorial diagram for the following transition table?
Would be nice to have an ability to see unique;
Draw a UML diagram for the following system: A cell phone is a type of computing device. It has a screen, USB jack, power button, and wake button. Include data members and methods for the classes you define, and show the appropriate relationships.
The user of my app has access to two tools within my app. Each tool is comprised of multiple tables that the user has to fill with information.
The app is more complex but that’s roughly what’s it’s about.
This is the UML Diagram that I have designed based on the app:
I am wondering whether the use case diagram should be designed otherwise. Maybe, I should design the use case diagram for each tool independently. That way, it will be less cumbersome.
But, this will mean that each tool represents its own system. And I don’t know if from a UML viewpoint, that is the right thing to do.