I’m very confused about how to create a bifurcation diagram of system with a codimension 2 bifurcation. Specificaly, I’m working with the following ODE:
f[r_,CC_,d_] = (1 - ((d + 3 Sqrt M)^2 (1 - (2 M)/(3 M + r)))/(3 M + r)^2) (1 + ((-3 + CC) M)/(-3 M + 2 (3 M + r)))
Even though I’ve got curves in the spaces $ (CC \times r)$ and $ (d \times r)$ , I’d like to get the bifurcation curve in the space $ (CC \times d)$ . How could I plot this?
In Django (Python web framework), I have a model
I need to visualize this chain of events:
Event is created, confirmation email is generated and sent to
Event can be confirmed either by customer or by agent using
url inside email. When
Event is confirmed, new object
Order. When the
Order is created, new
Invoice object has to be created and sent to customer.
This is a very simple model situation, I need to visualize much more events and relations.
Which diagram would you use and, if possible, how it looks like?
The only thing which comes to my mind is
UML sequence diagram but I’m not sure if it’s possible to visualize the whole process. I can’t figure out how to vizualize that CUSTOMER or AGENT can confirm the email etc…
Could you give me a hint? Which diagram should I use?
I want to create a SQL statement for return result this Query I hope that you can help me Ok, I want a return – [GET] /rentals (return the Movie Title, City rented in, Customer Name, and Date rented from most recent to least recent
you can see ER diagram this Question in : in this link you can see the ER diagram and Another thing that Related to my question
or you can see ER in :
Is there any difference in the Structure of a Segwit Block in comparison to a Traditional non-segwit Block? A diagram would be helpful if possible. Thank You!
I’m looking for failures in this “token based login” design, besides the UML “syntax” errors. Theoretically speaking, it will do the trick when implemented on an small project.
If true, sorry about my english.
Thaks in advance.
EDIT: Is 1) this model something useful and clear? 2) Will it work when implemented? 3) Besides the implementation, is secure?
I’m currently having a hard time with creating a component diagram that should represent a certain type of component/interface dependency and hope that you can give me some hints. As background, I only started learning UML and software engineering some weeks ago, so I assume that I just have a thinking barrier and/or am doing things more complicated than necessary.
Assume I have a “virtual” component Services. In this component I want to collect and model all services my system may offer. Next, I have a component Admin which (at this level) may use (and hence depend on) any of the services provided by Services. Last but not least there is a component User which may only use one specific service that is already known. Would this be properly represented by the attached component diagram? If not, how would it be properly represented? Would you just indicate that User also depends on the Services port and model the conrete interface dependency in a different diagram? Is a dependency from Admin to the Services port the proper way of showing the dependency to the “virtual” Services interface or would it be better to just show a dependency to the Services component?
Thank you for your help & patience
Implement the absorption law by using own scenario and construct the schematic diagram using basic gates.
Trialix Male – The ѕeхual issues are expanding in all parts of the world because of the augmentation in ailments. Men are probably going to get serious weaknesses from the low quality nourishment things and unhygienic items. This is diminishing their ѕeхual wants and expanding their ѕeхual issues. On the off chance that you are likewise experiencing the issues of erectile brokenness, little penis measure and…
Diagram of Trialix Male Enhancement:
We know the general figure of Venn diagrams for two or three distinct sets.
There are many formulas related to two or three sets.
For example, one of Distributive Law is
$ $ A \cup (B \cap C) = (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C).$ $
We can visualize it by using Venn Diagram, and guess that it is true.
And also, we can prove it to show that each side is contained in the other side.
It is my question. For rigorous proof, I know we should only use mathematical logic and theorem. Nonetheless, I want to check that Venn Diagram proof is also available for some easier cases.
Can Venn Diagram be one method of proof?
Can we prove that all proof by using Venn Diagram method for two or three sets is true?
If we prove that, then all statements for two or three sets can be strictly proved by using Venn Diagram.
Most UML software has two kinds of nodes for the activity diagram: Action and Activity. To me it seems that an Activity could represent something that by itsself would be represented by another activity diagram, and the actions would be seen as “atomic”.
Is this the correct semantic view?