Where do I find platforms that GSA-SER doesn’t already have engines written for?

I am curious about writing these engine scripts.
If you don’t know, SER has a scripting language GSA developed just for the task.
I’ve had other learning tasks ahead of this, but it seems about time I start exploring the engines.
I guess for my first try, it would be best to create an engine that already exists, and then see how close I came to doing it as it should be, since there is a guide/answer already there to check with!
But, just thinking ahead…once I am familiar with how this works, where do i source new platforms from that require a new engine? What are some methods that work to accomplish this? Thanks…
PS– there’s already  this page with links:

Build a DFA that accepts strings over {0,1,2} that are divided by 3 and doesn’t include the substring 012

Ive tried to draw it but im not finding the right way. Ive also read it “How to prove a language is regular?” and here – https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1556655/build-a-dfa-that-accepts-strings-over-0-1-2-that-are-divided-by-3-and-do , but still in the same situation. hope someone can help or give a lead.

Thats what ive got so far: DFA that accepts all strings

When should a toast should a-raise in web app (need psychological suggestion) why favourite doesn’t has toast but archive or delete has?

When should a toast should a-raise in web app (need psychological suggestion) why favourite doesn’t has toast but archive or delete has?

When should a toast should a-raise in web app (need psychological suggestion) why favourite doesn’t has toast but archive or delete has?

When should a toast should a-raise in web app (need psychological suggestion) why favourite doesn’t has toast but archive or delete has?

Using PnPListItem command doesn’t display all the columns of the list

I am uising Powershell with SharePoint Online. I have a list with 3 columns: Name, Emailadres, Title When I use the command to display the list:

Get-PnPListItem -List “test”

I get only the Id, Title and GUID columns

How to I get the columns Id, Name, Emailadres, Title of the list test displayed in PS.


wp_get_nav_menu_items doesn’t return custom post type item

I try to achieve a menu like this (this is the actual menu).

enter image description here

There is a tree of projet coordinated by the wordpress menu that manage route and navigation.

Here is a scheme of the menu and the corresponding route.

PROJECT  |  |__ PAINT        (SITE_URL/paint)  |    |__ post_1  (SITE_URL/paint/post_1)  |  |__ VIDEO        (SITE_URL/video)       |__ post_2  (SITE_URL/video/post_2)       |__ post_3  (SITE_URL/video/post_2) 

First of all, know that post_1, post_2 and post_3 are custom post type generated here by CPT UI.

I need to get this menu in Js and in php, so I created a class in order to parse the menu returned by wp_get_nav_menu_items. You will find the class FP_Nav inside fp_nav.php this git gist.

As the route doesn’t really exist while it’s set in the wordpress menu as Custom link (ie. /paint, /video in the below scheme). I use an action do_parse_request in order to prevent the native parse_request if the url match some of mine in my menu and let the parse_request execute if not. (find my custom “router” in fp_router.php also in the previous git gist

Here is my functions.php (in the same git gist) in order to know the order of how it’s executed.

The problem is:

When I load my class FP_Nav that is supposed to get all the item in the menu using wp_get_nav_menu_items and that should be run before the headers are sent (because I need to parse the request using the menu items), this function wp_get_nav_menu_items does not return any of my custom post that is set in the menu.

I declare my CPT in the action init but I suspect that my class FP_Nav is loaded before the CPT is loaded because in the index.php (template file), the menu got every fields and if I declare the CPT outside the init action as well.

Also I have to load this class BEFORE the headers are sent so I can move out the CPT declaration outstide the init action but I’m not sure it’s a good idea and somehow I would like to produce good code so if there is another solution, I’m on!

error 1932 table doesn’t exist in engine xampp

I am using Xampp in my local pc. My mysql wasn’t running, It was closing after starting, I was looking for some answers and found an answer in this forum and thought it would solve the problem. (link is here) . But it has worsen my problem. Now mysql is opening, but seeing another error: #1932 – Table doesn’t exist in engine. Now i am unable to do anything to all my databases. Can anyone point me out what goes wrong! and give me a solution!

Note: My Xampp version is v3.2.4

Best way to convey that one search criterion depends on another (or doesn’t)

I am creating a very basic screen in a desktop app that shows a customer service representative a customer’s order history. As of now, there are 4 criteria by which you can search:

  1. By order No.
  2. By product No/product description
  3. By date
  4. By Order type (e.g., cancelled orders, dispatched orders, fully paid orders, etc)

A user can search by any number of these criteria at once.

So far, simple, but there are two things that are causing me a lot of trouble.

  1. If you choose to search by Order type, then, you must also choose a date range, as the system is unable to return all orders of a type, only orders of that type within a date range.

  2. If you choose to search by order no, then all of the other search fields should be ignored (if they have anything in them). I.e., the order no search field is independent of the others.

How can I convey this to the user?

So far, I have come up with this:

----------------------------Search---------------------------------- Order No[       ][Search!]       Product No [          ]                                  Order type [          ]                                  Date       [          ]                                          [Search!] 

To solve 2, I placed the order no field far away from the other fields to convey its independence of them. But this looks ugly, and I don’t even know if it conveys independence.

To solve 1, I auto-fill the date field if the user selects an option from the order type field. But I have doubts about this, as the user may not understand why the date field has suddenly been populated, and may get frustrated when they try to clear it but can’t.

I’ve been pulling my hair out for 2 days over this. I’m just a programmer who has been given the responsibility of designing and implementing every aspect of this new large application. I have no UX or UI experience or knowledge.