Where could exit button be removed during onboarding process?

My company is re-designing the on-boarding process for Emergency Service within the app. The process as follows:

Page 1: Intro of Emergency Service Page 2: TOS Page 3: Permission Needed from user Page 4-9: Collection of personal/medical data from users for emergency service in the case of emergency situation

There’s an exit button from page 1-3 but not on page 4-9 onwards. However, “Back” button is presented from page 4-9.

My rational to remove exit button from Page 4- 9 as follows: 1. Users have 3 opportunities to exit the process in the beginning 2. Checked other 20 apps and found that all of them have no exit button after you agree on TOS and then start asking for your detailed information

Could anyone chip in or validate the user experience on lack of exit button after Page 3?

Any feedback is appreciated.


Better CTAs for ‘Save & exit’ and ‘Save & done’?

I’ve got a bit of a language block for the final stage of a form-filling journey where the user can either

  1. Save what they’ve done, quit and return later
  2. Save what they’ve done and lock it so no further changes can be made.

Save and exit kinda works for 1., but I can’t come up with a suitable unambiguously different label for 2.

Send is the closest, but no sending is involved – this is simply marking the work as ‘complete’ and putting it in a read-only state.

Save & exit and Save & done aren’t sufficiently different to me – anyone got anything better..?

Google Analytics: Exit page report differs from conversions

I have an issue determining my checkout pages exit percentage.

Looking at the site’s database event information for a single day I am given the following information:

  1. Entered checkout – 306
  2. Completed Checkout – 249
  3. 81% completed (completed / entered checkout)
  4. 19% exited (remainder)

When I look at my reporting in Google analytics I am given the following information:

  1. Entered checkout – 304
  2. Completed checkout – 247
  3. Exits – 26
  4. Exit % – 0.09% (exits / entered checkout)

So what reason would there be for my Exit % to be different than the math between the difference of entered and completed checkout?

Thanks in advance!

Leomund’s Tiny Hut — only the caster can’t exit and enter at will?

The text for Leomund’s tiny hut says in part:

Creatures and objects within the dome when you cast this spell can move through it freely.

but also

The spell ends if you leave its area.

I read that as saying that everyone can exit and enter at will, except the caster, who must remain inside the hut for the entire time. Is that correct?

MountVolume.setup failed for volume “…”: mount failed: exit status 32

My OS is Ubuntu, using openshift, and one pod keep pending, because nfs server cannot be mounted (nfs server is able to be mounted by mannually using command line, but cannot be mounted from the Pod)

I have installed nfs-common, so it’s not the root cause. I trying to install nfs-utils, but I was failed, the error message is:

E: Unable to locate package: nfs-utils.

I also tried libnfs12 and libnfs-utils, they were the same as nfs-utils. I also used apt-get install upgade and update to solve the package locating problem, but they were useless.

I’m going to show the yaml file for connecting the nfs server

apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata:   name: pv-test01   lables:     disktype: baas spec:   capacity:     storage: 1Gi   accessModes:     - ReadWriteMany   nfs:     path: /baas     server:     readOnly: false   persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Recycle 

after using “oc describe pod/mypod” for the pending Pod, below is the feedback:

Warning  FailedMount  14s  kubelet, localhost  MountVolume.SetUp failed for volume "pv-test01" : mount failed: exit status 32 Mounting command: systemd-run Mounting arguments: --description=Kubernetes transient mount for /var/lib/origin/cluster-up/root/openshift.local.clusterup/openshift.local.volumes/pods/267db6f2-d875-11e9-80ba-005056bc3ce0/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/pv-test01 --scope -- mount -t nfs /var/lib/origin/cluster-up/root/openshift.local.clusterup/openshift.local.volumes/pods/267db6f2-d875-11e9-80ba-005056bc3ce0/volumes/kubernetes.io~nfs/pv-test01 Output: Running scope as unit run-28094.scope. mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on,        missing codepage or helper program, or other error        (for several filesystems (e.g. nfs, cifs) you might        need a /sbin/mount.<type> helper program)         In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try        dmesg | tail or so. 

so how can I mount to nfs server from the Pod?

Modern Team Site document library page in SP2019 does not show Exit classic experience option

I am working with SharePoint on prem 2019 and have a team site created in modern experience where several document libraries have been added. When site is accessed and document library link is clicked from quick launch, it opens up in modern UI. Once return to classic sharepoint is clicked, it takes to the classic experience. Once on the classic UI page, I do not see ‘Exit Classic experience’ link on the lower bottom left to go back to modern ui at all.

What could be the cause of this, can someone please assist, thanks in advance.

Error while installing package: installed python3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status4 on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS

(Ubuntu 18.04 LTS) Unable to install “Time Table calculator”: Error while installing package: installed python3 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status4 ScreenShot of Error Message

Please help me to fix this issue.

Are there any low-level means to *exit* the Ethereal plane to a plane of my choosing?

This question is meant to be an extension of this question on planar travel, this question on lower-level planar travel and this question on using blink and banishment to enter the Ethereal plane.

Based on how I read these, by using blink and banishment, my character can get to the Ethereal Plane… Is there a RAW way that I could get out of the Ethereal plane onto a plane of my choosing?

I do not know of any solution beyond what was covered in the linked questions – I’m asking to confirm that no other answers exist. If the linked questions are comprehensive, this question is definitely a duplicate.


Our party wants to enter the Shadowfell, but our efforts to find portals have failed thus far. (When our characters have searched, the characters and most players didn’t know where to look, so it could be our DM would let us find them if we applied ourselves better. However, we will assume that the DM is not deliberately hiding a portal).


  • I would like a solution available at lower levels than I could use Etherealness or Plane Shift.
  • I personally only have access to the PHB, DMG, MM, and XGtE, but I am open to any official (or even most 3rd party) material.
  • I am focused on 5e, but I am also curious if there is something in earlier editions that fits the bill.
  • For purposes of banishment, my character is from the Material Plane.
  • If it matters, assume my character is a Wizard (I don’t think my DM would “run with it” if I tried blink/banishment without telling him beforehand).
  • This would be at the exclusion of solutions mentioned in other answers, such as Finding/obtaining a Scroll of Plane Shift, being a Planeswalker, becoming a Horizon Walker Ranger, or finding a Planar Portal.

(Again, if the answers to the linked questions are comprehensive, this question is a duplicate.)