manually build 8 pbn backlinks on extremely high trust for $30

Hello dear buyer I am new on FIVVER but you don’t worry i have more than two year work experience in this field and i will give you a professional result . Please give me chance to earn your valuable rating GIG DETAILS:- I will manually build 10 UNIQUE HOMEPAGE PBN backIinks on Extremely High Trust Flow & Citation Flow and Domain Authority & Page Authority Domains. PBN Iinks are goldmines in SEO. If you are looking for bulk quantity spammy links, then this service is not for you. THIS service IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR QUALITY LOVERS who want natural links with relevant content on HIGH AUTHORITY sites. Such high metrics l!inks will definitely boost your SERP. Main Features: ★ TF CF DA PA 30+ to 10 GUARANTEED! ★ Homepage PBN links from HIGH AUTHORITY AGED DOMAINS ★ 100% Manually Done ★ 100% Do Follow & Permanent Links ★ 100% UNIQUE IPs ★ 100% Unique Human-readable 500+ words content with relevant images in all PBN posts ★ All domains are well indexed on Google★ OBL limited to 20 ONLY ★ FASTEST RANKING IMPROVEMENT ★ Detailed report ★ Guaranteed order delivery within 24- 48 hours Note: We don’t accept Adults, Gambling, Porn & Illegal sites. THANK YOU

by: ArvindMehta4152
Created: —
Category: PBNs
Viewed: 165


Removing numerous ‘homepage’ entries from Contacts.app with AppleScript extremely slow

A syncing issue with Outlook left me with hundreds, if not thousands of duplicate contacts. After managing to merge duplicates without Contacts crashing, I was left with 177 contacts, most of which with many repeat homepage entries. Rather than dying of boredom removing these by hand, I put together some AppleScript to do this for me, thinking that this would take a few minutes. It’s been a week now – the script starts well enough but soon slows down continually and also takes more and more memory from the system, until the spinning beachball of doom appears halting the script. One issue is that I seem to only be able to delete a contact’s urls one at a time in sequence, instead of all at once.

So the question is, what have I got wrong making this script near useless? Could it have something to do with iCloud syncing? Or is AppleScript inherently inefficient? (The constant saving is there because of the random times the script would cease functioning.):

tell application "Contacts"     activate     with timeout of 72000 seconds         set myPeople to people         set numPeople to (count of myPeople)         repeat with i from 1 to numPeople             set myGuy to item i of myPeople             set myGuyName to get name of myGuy             set personUrls to (the urls of myGuy whose value contains "outlook")             set urlNum to count of personUrls             if urlNum > 0 then                 repeat with j from urlNum to 1 by -1                     log ((time string of (current date)) & " – [" & i & "/" & numPeople & "] " & myGuyName & " (" & j & "/" & urlNum & "): " & (the label of item j of personUrls))                     delete item j of personUrls                     save                 end repeat             else                 log "No problematic URLs found for " & myGuyName             end if             if note of myGuy is not missing value then set note of myGuy to ""         end repeat         save         log "Final save"     end timeout     return end tell 

How do you choose a font for extremely limited space, i.e. will fit the most READABLE text in the smallest space?

I often have very limited space when creating reports and dashboards for users. I usually use Arial, or Arial Narrow, but UI isn’t my area of expertise, so I want to know, how do you determine an optimal font for fitting the most readable text in the smallest space?

Here is an example: Keep in mind this is just an example, as there are many times that space is limited, such as when you need to squeeze a million columns into a report, etc.

Chart with limited space

Hard disk extremely slow over certain times

I have a raspberry pi (running raspbian) and a 5 year old hard disk (NTFS). Everything operates normally most of time until there is a massive read/write occurring on the disk. Example:

m@raspberrypi:~/backupdisk $   dd if=/dev/zero of=output bs=8k count=10k; rm -f output 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 83886080 bytes (84 MB, 80 MiB) copied, 3.26341 s, 25.7 MB/s m@raspberrypi:~/backupdisk $   dd if=/dev/zero of=output bs=8k count=10k; rm -f output ^C622+0 records in 622+0 records out 5095424 bytes (5.1 MB, 4.9 MiB) copied, 54.4939 s, 93.5 kB/s  m@raspberrypi:~/backupdisk $   ^C m@raspberrypi:~/backupdisk $   dd if=/dev/zero of=output bs=8k count=10k; rm -f output 10240+0 records in 10240+0 records out 83886080 bytes (84 MB, 80 MiB) copied, 3.21822 s, 26.1 MB/s 

When a slow down is experienced, the disk may not recover for 5-20 mins.

How can I figure out what is happening?

A simple counting step following a group by key is extremely slow in a DataFlow pipeline

I have a DataFlow pipeline trying to build an index (key-value pairs) and compute some metrics (like a number of values per key). The input data is about 60 GB total, stored on GCS and the pipeline has about 126 workers allocated.

The pipeline seems to make no progress despite having 126 workers and based on the wall time the bottleneck seems to be a simple counting step that follows a group by. While all other steps have on average less than 1 hour spent in them, the counting step took already 50 days of the wall time. There seems to be no helpful information all warnings in the log.

The counting step was implemented following a corresponding step in the WordCount example:

def count_keywords_per_asin(self, key_and_group):     key, group = key_and_group     count = 0     for e in group:         count += 1      self.stats.asin_counter.inc()     self.stats.keywords_per_asin_dist.update(count)      return (key, count) 

The preceding step “Group keywords” is a simple beam.GroupByKey() transformation.

Please advise what might be the reason and how this can be optimized.

The pipeline steps including the counting one can be seen below: enter image description here

Extremely high fee for sending BTC using Electrum android wallet

I wanted to experiment with android mobile BTC wallets and stumbled upon Electrum.

I only have one transaction input to this wallet and that was from my Binance account.

I have a balance of 0.002BTC.

When trying to send the maximum value of my balance, I get a value of 0.001BTC (approx 2.89GBP).

The fee says 25 blocks.. 2.5 sat/byte.

I have no idea why it is costing 0.001BTC to send 0.001BTC?

What methods exist to get infinite or extremely high caster level?

In a recent answer, KRyan mentions that there are multiple tricks to get infinite caster level in 3.5. I’m not aware of very many, and those I am aware of require iffy rules interpretations:

  • Greater Consumptive Field (SpC, p. 51) does not work on its own (even with a permissive reading of the spell, it caps out at twice your unimproved caster level). However, alternating castings of Greater Consumptive Field and Consumptive Field will work if you read “your original caster level” to mean “your caster level before you increase it with this casting” and not “your caster level before any temporary increases.”
  • The other high-impact caster level trick I’m aware of is combining Ur-Priest (CD, p. 70) with Sublime Chord (CA, p. 60) to exploit their non-standard caster level calculations. This trick was popularized by the early optimization showcase The Wish and The Word. However, I believe this trick requires conflating “caster level” with “levels in spellcasting classes,” and therefore doesn’t actually work.

What other tricks exist to achieve infinite or extremely high caster levels (say, caster level >100 at character level 20)? Which ones require permissive readings of the rules, and which are more airtight?

Fastboot commands extremely slow

I’m trying to unlock my HTC U11 and I’ve tried to run fastboot both from the packages of my Ubuntu derivative (fastboot version 1:7.0.0+r33-2) and from the platform tools (fastboot version 28.0.1-4986621).

I can see my device both with adb in normal operation and with fastboot devices in download mode.

The output of fastboot getvar all is:

(bootloader) kernel: lk (bootloader) product: htc_ocndugl (bootloader) version: 1.0 (bootloader) max-download-size: 1562400000 (bootloader) serialno: xxx (bootloader) slot-count: 0 (bootloader) current-slot: (bootloader) imei: xxx (bootloader) version-main: 1.27.401.11 (bootloader) boot-mode: download (bootloader) version-baseband: xxx (bootloader) version-bootloader: 1.0.0.0000 (bootloader) mid: 2PZC30000 (bootloader) cid: HTC__034 all: finished. total time: 0.005s

When I try to get a token in order to unlock the phone, the command doesn’t complete within any reasonable amount of time, e.g., fastboot oem get_identifier_token did not complete after hours and I unplugged the phone:

... (bootloader) [KillSwitch] : /dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/frp (bootloader) [KillSwitch] Last Byte is 0X01, enable unlock FAILED (status read failed (No such device)) finished. total time: 23223.012s

Has anyone seen this or can give me any pointers as to what I’m doing wrong?

skin The symptoms of sensitive skin are extremely complex

skin The symptoms of sensitive skin are extremely complex. Often, the. In some cases, the skin tends to Azur Derma dryness and itching appears . In addition, the skin can also shed . Why you should definitely treat sensitive skin The outer area of the skin is the natural protective layer against all negative environmental influences from the outside. In addition, this area prevents us from losing moisture. With the sensitive…

skin The symptoms of sensitive skin are extremely complex