Web application Design – using full screen width

With today large screen resolution (1920 screen width rules now), I need to decide between using the full width of the screen (liquid) versus fixed with (padding with white margin over 1366px for example).

Our main a web applications has tables, lists, complex forms and is designed to be used mainly on organisation Desktops.

While using all screen width can be great in terms of complex layouts such as master-detail, many charts and tables, I am aware that elements that are in the far left/right corners can be ignored easily. I see that many web apps goes for the full screen width (slack, Asana, Jira, Salesforce). Any ideas, thoughts or references regards such decision?

Thanks, Iris–

Full SEO website audit for $10

What will i provide in the report? Meta TitleĀ  Meta Description Google Search Preview Wholesome Keyword Analysis. Heading Tags H1, H2, H3 Robots.txt Test Sitemap Test Image ALT Test HTML Compression/GZIP Test Site Loading Speed Test Page Parameters(script, html, css,) Doctype Test AND many other Factors.

by: seoultra
Created: —
Category: Onsite SEO & Research
Viewed: 187


Full SEO website audit for $10

What will i provide in the report? Meta TitleĀ  Meta Description Google Search Preview Wholesome Keyword Analysis. Heading Tags H1, H2, H3 Robots.txt Test Sitemap Test Image ALT Test HTML Compression/GZIP Test Site Loading Speed Test Page Parameters(script, html, css,) Doctype Test AND many other Factors.

by: seoultra
Created: —
Category: Onsite SEO & Research
Viewed: 187


DOWNLOAD ANY VIDEOS MP4 HD AND FULL HD WITHIN 2 DAY for $5

my main target is excellent and best quality output services give you. I’ll give to you this service for only 5$ 15 OR 18 videos (maximum duration time 1hour 30minute) MP4 480 720HD 1080 FULL HD can’t you download videos? want you download videos? Don’t worry we’ll do it send to the me correct web address(URL) you want to download and Name of the site to download I will provide you with a reliable and fast service best quality output PIXELX

by: pixelx
Created: —
Category: Video
Viewed: 125


If I mandated that full casters take 1 non-spellcasting class level for every 2 spellcaster levels, would they be balanced with 2/3 casters?

I’ve been asking about how to balance player characters, and others have suggested using tier 3 classes only, or using only spellcasters who cast 6th-level spells.

This is not the place to contest those ideas, even if they happen to be the starting point for what happened next.

My players want to run a campaign where they all play dwarves, and dwarves have a malus to charisma. This arguably cuts out the bard, the skald, the bloodrager, the summoner and the paladin unless they take the Tortured Crusader archetype.

Along with the ban on wizards, sorcerers, druids, clerics, shamans, oracles, arcanists and witches, the playable classes are greatly reduced.

What would happen, balance-wise, if I were to introduce full casters again, mandating one level of a non-spellcasting class every 2 spellcaster levels?

Specifically, I have a player who would like to play a druid focused on earth magic, which I think is a great concept, but under the no-full-casters rule this is just not possible.

I expect the reduced caster level to harm those multiclassed characters more than the actual lack of favored class bonuses.

Examples:
Would a hunter 17 be better or worse than a druid 12 / ranger 5?
Would a warpriest 17 be better or worse than a cleric 11 / fighter 6?

Note: I will also be using martial initiators from Path of War, who work best when multiclassing due to their peculiar mechanics. I already expect the answer to be different for them (also because a fighter 6 / stalker 11 can reach level 7 maneuvers).