Two Menus gives me message “Text Duplicate”

My website has 2 menus: 1 is used for mobile devices and the other for desktop devices. When I test my SEO in "Seobility.net" I get the message "Text Duplicate". (Image attached) Is there anything I can do to indicate to the spider that one menu is for mobile and one is for the desktop? The mobile menu is located at top right of the website whereas the desktop menu is located at the side. Here is the code:

<nav id="main-nav" class="h-nav">           <div id="show-nav"><a href="#">Menu ☰</a></div>           <ul class="nav-menu">             <li><a href="https://www.tranquilhavens.com.au" class="current">Home</a></li>             <li><a href="dwarfmondo.html">Dwarf Mondo Grass</a></li>             <li><a href="dwarfmondotrays.html">Dwarf Mondo Trays</a></li>             <li><a href="koreangrass.html">Zoysia No Mow Pots</a></li>             <li><a href="nomowgrasstrays.html">Zoysia No Mow Trays</a></li>             <li><a href="dichondratrays.html">Dichondra Trays</a></li>             <li><a href="thymemagiccarpettrays.html">Thyme Trays</a></li>             <li><a href="corsicanminttrays.html">Corsican Mint Trays</a></li>             <li><a href="zoysiaexperiment.html">Zoysia Experiment</a></li>             <li><a href="contactus.html">Contact Us</a></li>             <li><a href="links.html">Links</a></li>           </ul>         </nav>         <!-- END: header -->         <div class="main clearfix">           <div class="sidebar">             <ul>               <li><a href="https://www.tranquilhavens.com.au" class="current">Home</a></li>               <li><a href="dwarfmondo.html">Dwarf Mondo Grass</a></li>               <li><a href="dwarfmondotrays.html">Dwarf Mondo Trays</a></li>               <li><a href="koreangrass.html">Zoysia No Mow Pots</a></li>               <li><a href="nomowgrasstrays.html">Zoysia No Mow Trays</a></li>               <li><a href="dichondratrays.html">Dichondra Trays</a></li>               <li><a href="thymemagiccarpettrays.html">Thyme Trays</a></li>               <li><a href="corsicanminttrays.html">Corsican Mint Trays</a></li>               <li><a href="zoysiaexperiment.html">Zoysia Experiment</a></li>               <li><a href="contactus.html">Contact Us</a></li>               <li><a href="links.html">Links</a></li>             </ul>           </div>           <!-- END: sidebar --> 

enter image description here

Does/Should the Gladiator background grant proficiency in the weapon it gives?

The Gladiator background (an Entertainer variant, from PHB p. 130-131) gives a strange weapon (like a trident or net) as starting equipment, but doesn’t explicitly specify that it gives proficiency with said weapon.

Is it implied that it does? (Or if not, should it, considering that a seasoned gladiator is expected to be particularly skilled with his weapon of choice?)

MySQL SSL Gives Warnings about big name Certificate Authorities

I have been able to setup my MySQL to use LetsEncrypt certificates with the steps below, unfortunately it is issuing warnings about official certs being self-signed (like from DigiCert, Comodo, etc…), so I wonder if there’s something missing from the configuration. anyways, here’s my ssl configuration:

[mysqld] require_secure_transport = on mysqlx = 0 ssl_capath  = /etc/ssl/certs ssl_ca      = /etc/ssl/certs/lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem ssl_cert    = /etc/mysql/cert.pem ssl_key     = /etc/mysql/privkey.pem ssl_cipher  = DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 tls_version = TLSv1.2 

the problem

Everything in the ssl_capath comes up as a warning in the startup log (im doing tail -f /var/log/mysql/error.log):

YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.SSSSSZ 0 [Warning] [MY-010068] [Server] CA certificate /etc/ssl/certs/SwissSign_Gold_CA_-_G2.pem is self signed. YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.SSSSSZ 0 [Warning] [MY-010068] [Server] CA certificate /etc/ssl/certs/Trustwave_Global_ECC_P256_Certification_Authority.pem is self signed. ... 

background

the ssl_ca file is from doing wget https://letsencrypt.org/certs/lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem -O /etc/ssl/certs/lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem

the ssl_cert is from getting my LE live subfolder cert.pem file, same with the ssl_key (from LE’s privkey.pem). I’ve also restricted cipher and TLS version, but that’s probably not it.

To verify that everything is indeed working correctly, I have added the following to my client configuration (locally, not on that server):

[mysql] ssl_capath = /etc/ssl/certs 

and this session output:

user@localhost:~$   mysql --ssl-mode=VERIFY_IDENTITY -h mydomain.mytld -u remote -p -e "show variables like '%ssl%'; show session status like '%cipher%';" +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+ | Variable_name                       | Value                                           | +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+ | admin_ssl_ca                        |                                                 | | admin_ssl_capath                    |                                                 | | admin_ssl_cert                      |                                                 | | admin_ssl_cipher                    |                                                 | | admin_ssl_crl                       |                                                 | | admin_ssl_crlpath                   |                                                 | | admin_ssl_key                       |                                                 | | have_openssl                        | YES                                             | | have_ssl                            | YES                                             | | performance_schema_show_processlist | OFF                                             | | ssl_ca                              | /etc/ssl/certs/lets-encrypt-x3-cross-signed.pem | | ssl_capath                          | /etc/ssl/certs                                  | | ssl_cert                            | /etc/mysql/cert.pem                             | | ssl_cipher                          | DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384                       | | ssl_crl                             |                                                 | | ssl_crlpath                         |                                                 | | ssl_fips_mode                       | OFF                                             | | ssl_key                             | /etc/mysql/privkey.pem                          | +-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Variable_name            | Value                                                                                                | +--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Current_tls_cipher       | DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384                                                                            | | Current_tls_ciphersuites |                                                                                                      | | Ssl_cipher               | DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384                                                                            | | Ssl_cipher_list          | TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 | +--------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 

When a ranged attack deals multiple damage types, can I choose what damage type my Sharpshooter bonus gives?

I am a Blood Hunter (Critical Role class here) with the Sharpshooter and Crossbow Expert feats wielding two hand crossbows. My Crimson Rite allows me to deal an additional 1dx magical damage of some element when I make an attack with a targeted weapon. Sharpshooter simply says that you can add 10 damage to the attack, but it doesn’t specify type. I see a direct comparison to Jeremy Crawford’s ruling on Hunter’s Mark, implying I could choose the damage type of the extra damage. Am I missing some rule that contradicts my assumption?

If a creator of a Shield Guardian gives the control amulet to the Shield Guardian, what would happen?

There was an idea pitched at one of my play sessions earlier this week that has been gnawing at me. Suppose a wizard creates a shield guardian and gives the golem the telepathic command to take off the amulet and live a life of its own; what would happen?

Would the Shield Guardian become a sort of pseudo-warforged, following the original command? Would it just be stuck, standing there?

Mage slayer gives disadvantage on concetration on all attacks or just on the reactive one?

Mage Slayer:

When a creature within 5 ft. of you casts a spell, you can use your reaction to make a melee weapon attack against that creature, and when you damage a creature that is concentrating on a spell, that creature has disadvantage on the saving throw it makes to maintain its concentration. You also have advantage on saving throws against spells cast by creatures within 5 ft. of you.

Does that mean that when this PJ hits a mage concentrating on a spell with the Attack action on their turn, they also have disadvantage? Or does it just happen when the attack occurs upon being triggered by a spell being cast on mele range?

Is there an official feat that gives expertise for weapons?

I am playing, as well as about to start DM’ing a one shot, in fifth edition D&D and one of my soon-to-be players has talked to me about making either a Fighter (Samurai) or Monk (Kensei) and was wondering if there was any feat that acted like the Bard’s “Expertise” class feature but for weapons rather then skills.

While I have found some homebrewed content for this, I haven’t found anything official, but I just might not be looking in the right places. Is there something like this or at least a homebrew that is relatively balanced?

Edit: Rather then adding the bonus to attack roll I was looking for something that just effects Damage even if it was a just 1/rest effect. I know that “Great Weapon Master” effect is a -5 to hit, +10 to damage. But I was hoping that there was something like, all attacks deal x2 Proficiency Damage for this turn, 1/rest, so the “Arthur the Archer” example wouldn’t effect his to hit chance just the damage he deals IF he hits.

UPDATE with variables to renumber column gives syntax error

Searching for a way to renumber a column within mysql, I’ve found multiple articles showing the same approach:

  • Renumbering an Ordering Field in MySQL
  • How to update a MySql column with ascending numbers

among others.

But trying it on my table I get a syntax error.

mysql> SET @rankStart = 10; mysql> SET @rankInc = 10; mysql> UPDATE fileFileTbl SET rank = (@rankStart := @rankStart + @rankInc) ORDER BY `rank` ASC; ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'rank = (@rankStart := @rankStart + @rankInc) ORDER BY `rank` ASC' at line 1 

The command looks identical to the articles posted. What am I missing?

Here’s the table (with some columns omitted):

CREATE TABLE `fileFileTbl` (   `id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,   `fileEngineId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,   `rank` int(11) DEFAULT '0',   `fileName` varchar(30) CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_general_ci DEFAULT 'newfile',   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),   UNIQUE KEY `fileEngineId` (`fileEngineId`,`rank`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=16 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; 

System is Centos 8, with mysql as:

# mysql --version mysql  Ver 8.0.17 for Linux on x86_64 (Source distribution) 

Gigantic Steed class ability gives all the benefits of a Huge mount?

As per title, I’m wondering whether the Gigantic Steed ability of the Mammoth Rider grants your mount all the benefits of a size increase, namely +8 Str. In fact, the text of the ability is:

A mammoth rider’s steed increases to Huge size. […] It also gains a +2 size bonus to its Strength and Constitution.

And then the bonuses to Str and Con increase over time with the Mammoth Rider class. So, for example, a standard Mastodon companion has a base str of 24, so by becoming Huge its str goes up to 26 (and then there are all the size modifiers to CMB, CMD, AC, Attack, etc). Am I correct?

Finally, I recall that a size increase from large to huge means +8 str, but I can’t find any confirmation in the books. Right now all I have is Animal Growth’s text and the fact that PCGen gives it a +8 str. Is there any standard reference for the matter?

Computing automaton for $L(A) / L(B)$ gives ones for $A,B$

I’m trying to figure out whether infinite language change the answer.

Show that the following language is decidable: $ $ L=\{\langle A,B \rangle : \text{$ A,B$ are DFAs, $ L(B)$ is finite, and $ L(A)/ L(B)=L(0^*1^*)$ }\}.$ $

(I am talking about right division.)

We know how to check whether the language of a DFA is finite, and given two DFAs, we know how to check whether their languages are equal. The algorithms I know to the above problems uses the DFA’s, so it is necessary having the DFA’s in order to decide those problems.

I’m trying to figure out whether $ |L(B)|=\infty$ changes the answer. To the best of my understanding, because $ |L(B)|<\infty$ , we can explicitly construct a DFA that accepts $ L(A)/ L(B)$ , whereas if $ L (B)=\infty$ all we know is about the existence of $ DFA$ that accepts $ L(A)/ L(B)$ .

However, even if $ L(B)$ is an infinite language, since there is a finite number of DFAs, one of which accepts $ L(A) / L(B)$ , I can certainly know that there is a Turing machine that decides the language $ L$ . Right?