Problem with two WP installation on root and subfolder

Let me give you some context.I have a and with each their own wordpress instal

I created the the blog in the first place, and then the “main” wordpress.

The weird thing is that now, when I want to go to, it automatically redirects me to

And sometimes it is the opposite, the website works, but the /blog is not existing anymore… (404 or just blank page) And these two cases are shifting from one to another (not sure how)

Any idea why this happens ?

Thanks for your help !

Why is it that version managers are always mentioned after the installation instructions?

As much as I want to put this on StackOverflow, I think this particular question fits better here.

I hope this doesn’t sound too petty, but this is something that has always bothered me.

I’ve always wondered why the designers/developers of programming language websites don’t just put version managers right next to the initial setup and installation instructions in their documentation instead of long after, and sometimes quite hidden in the side-notes.

Most people (I would assume at least) follow installation procedures line by line. That being the case, and the fact that you usually have to install the version managers first if you have a need for them; wouldn’t it be more logical to bring the version managers to the user’s awareness right around the same point in the documentation as the language’s installation instructions?

In fact, Ruby is the only language I’ve ever installed that started the installation section with something like:

“some language” Installation Options:

  • Stand Alone Installation Instructions
  • Virtual Machine Installation
  • Installation With A Version Manager

So, as stupid as this might sound, I’ve begun to wonder if there isn’t some reason for this. Obviously, I’m not trying to excuse anybody for not thinking of version management up front, however considering that I almost always forget about version management when coming into a new language, I’d assume that it’s at least sort of common to make that mistake.

So, is this one of those globally common bad design things? Is this even bad design or am I just being whiny? Or is there legitimate reasoning behind this, and if so – what? It seems far too common a practice for it to just be by accident. I mean, who writes up installation procedures, then adds version management instructions at the tail end and not think, “huh, maybe I should put this up at the top.” ?

SP 2013 New Installation Error no URL “_catalogs/masterpage/minimal.master

Following Error MSG i get Following Error from OSC Diagnostics

Firewall is deactivated Prerequisites run Smooth Farmadmin is local Admin and sysadmin on DB setup Started on Powershell Sharepoint Binaries are new installed

The DB are created on the SQL Server (AdminContent, SP_Config)

SP 2013 New Installation Error no URL “_catalogs/masterpage/minimal.master

Following Error MSG i get Following Error from OSC Diagnostics

Firewall is deactivated Prerequisites run Smooth Farmadmin is local Admin and sysadmin on DB setup Started on Powershell Sharepoint Binaries are new installed

The DB are created on the SQL Server (AdminContent, SP_Config)

Anaconda installation modifying .bash_profile on Mac OS X

I installed Anaconda on my Mac (Mojave) and now whenever I start a shell it automatically activates the conda environment. This was totally fine until I realized some of the commands in my .bashrc were not being executed on startup. In particular, I had increased HISTSIZE and HISTFILESIZE but they always seemed to be stuck at their default values of 500. After some googling, I learnt that because of my anaconda installation, it was my .bash_profile that was being used on startup and not .bashrc. This is what my .bash_profile looks like (see below), just adding commands from my .bashrc file (e.g., HISTFILESIZE=100000) to the top of my .bash_profile appears to do nothing. Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong? Thanks!

# Setting PATH for Python 3.7 # The original version is saved in .bash_profile.pysave PATH="/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.7/bin:$  {PATH}" export PATH # added by Anaconda3 2019.07 installer # >>> conda init >>> # !! Contents within this block are managed by 'conda init' !! __conda_setup="$  (CONDA_REPORT_ERRORS=false '/anaconda3/bin/conda' shell.bash hook 2> /dev/null)" if [ $  ? -eq 0 ]; then     \eval "$  __conda_setup" else     if [ -f "/anaconda3/etc/profile.d/" ]; then # . "/anaconda3/etc/profile.d/"  # commented out by conda initialize         CONDA_CHANGEPS1=false conda activate base     else         \export PATH="/anaconda3/bin:$  PATH"     fi fi unset __conda_setup # <<< conda init <<<  # >>> conda initialize >>> # !! Contents within this block are managed by 'conda init' !! __conda_setup="$  ('//anaconda3/bin/conda' 'shell.bash' 'hook' 2> /dev/null)" if [ $  ? -eq 0 ]; then     eval "$  __conda_setup" else     if [ -f "//anaconda3/etc/profile.d/" ]; then         . "//anaconda3/etc/profile.d/"     else         export PATH="//anaconda3/bin:$  PATH"     fi fi unset __conda_setup # <<< conda initialize <<< 

dual booting an HP laptop,4gb ram,intel i3 6006.Windows 10 and ubuntu dual boot, each time i install ubuntu “something else” option in installation

I am installing ubuntu on HP laptop with windows 10 preinstalled . Each time i install ubuntu on a partition the grub is not installing i386 file in /boot/grub folder which causes error as grub searches for that file and run into grub rescue at each boot , hence i cannot boot into ubuntu nor windows , i manually added the file by live usb but failed to make grub config for such changes . My partition show (hd,msdos6) as root . grub is installed on root partition. Grub never installs the i386 file and this file can be found in /usr/lib/grub .

Bringing the Installed Ubuntu OS to first installation stage

I am at beginning stage of understanding/ learning Ubuntu OS.. Started Using Ubuntu from 17.04 release..

I have several times Reinstalled the Installed OS while learning, breaking the OS.. I felt Its quite time consuming reinstalling the OS..


say, for example when I installed the OS Ubuntu 18.04.3 minimal installation. I will run apt list --installed and It will give some package names..

for example, some part of above command is

libperlio-gzip-perl/bionic,now 0.19-1build3 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpgm-5.2-0/bionic,now 5.2.122~dfsg-2 amd64 [installed,automatic] libphonenumber7/bionic,now 7.1.0-5ubuntu5 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpipeline1/bionic,now 1.5.0-1 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpixman-1-0/bionic,now 0.34.0-2 amd64 [installed,automatic] libplist3/bionic,now 2.0.0-2ubuntu1 amd64 [installed,automatic] libplymouth4/bionic-updates,now 0.9.3-1ubuntu7.18.04.2 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpng16-16/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 1.6.34-1ubuntu0.18.04.2 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpolkit-agent-1-0/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.5 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpolkit-backend-1-0/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.5 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpolkit-gobject-1-0/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.5 amd64 [installed,automatic] libpoppler-glib8/bionic-updates,bionic-security,now 0.62.0-2ubuntu2.10 amd64 [installed,automatic] 

and after some days I will have additional packages installed during the time and requirement.. I have bad habit of editing the package contents just to try different things..

Say while Installing Ubuntu 18.04.3 I have fresh packages of 100nos.. and after some days I have 150nos..

Is there a way to store the package names that are Initially available Just after the fresh Installation of OS. After that prepare a script which will only install those packages and remove access 50nos?

Note: I have High Speed Internet with Required DATA capacity to download all the 100 packages..

Is this Achievable with a script?


apt purge access 50 packages apt autoremove && apt autoclean apt install those initial 100 packages