Google Analytics 3 – Date range issue while viewing all Pages (Site Content Pages)

I am using Google Analytics 3 property, and using a custom dimension "UserName" (Scope = User). I am trying to view all pages/ page URLS a particular user has travelled in the website. I am trying to filter using the "UserName" custom Dimension in Behaviors -> Site Content -> All pages.

This particular user whom I am filtering has done some activity on some dates and in other dates no activity.

For example — Sept 1st and Sept 2nd he has visited some pages, other dates like Aug 30, Aug 31 no visits.

When I am trying to see the page view — by filtering this user in Custom Dimension – When I select the dates specifically which he has done activity data is displayed in the graph and table .

When I select random date range — which is a combination of (activity dates and no activity dates), data is not displayed in the table – shows No data but in the graph above data is shown. Attached the Image.

How to proceed with this issue ? Is this an issue for GA side ?

Image

Spacing issue in Nesting Flex Grid Items

Hello, I am facing a spacing issue between my two containers. I am trying to replicate this mock up (https://ibb.co/cy44QdV). Using these guidelines (https://dds.digitalservices.syr.edu/layout/flexbox).
Any suggestions will help. Here is what I have

 {% load i18n wagtailcore_tags %} {% load i18n static %}  <main class="main">  <div class='flex-container'>  <div class='flex-grid'>  <div class='flex-grid-item-7-md'>  <div class='flex-row'>  <div class='flex-grid-item-7-md '>  <div...
Code (markup):

Spacing issue in Nesting Flex Grid Items

Not so common HTML transition to wordpress issue

This is one possibility most of the time:

<div class="wrap">     <header></header>     <main></main>     <footer></footer> </div> 

But my design is like this where wrap has a flex, and the sidebar and main are horizontally positioned. →

<div class="wrap">     <section class="sidebar">         <header></header>         <footer></footer>     </section>     <main></main> </div> 

Here header and footer are one after another in the sidebar and the main content is in another container. How should I transfer this HTML into WordPress? I am facing a mental obstacle.

Issue with Piecewise Parametric Plotting

I am trying to make a parametric plot of a piecewise function that is defined locally. For some odd reason, Mathematica will only plot the first two pieces of the piecewise function. If I plug in numerical vaues to either $ \gamma$ or $ t$ as defined in the program below then a numerical value is returned for totalXFunc and totalYFunc. What gives here?

g = .511; v[\[Gamma]_] := 3*^8 Sqrt[1 - 1/\[Gamma]^2]; B = 1.4; e = 1.602*^-19; m = 9.31*^-31; \[Omega][\[Gamma]_] := B*e/(\[Gamma]*m); r[\[Gamma]_] := 34*\[Gamma]*g/14000.; regionTwoWidth = 5*^-2;  f1x[t_, \[Gamma]_] := v[\[Gamma]]*t; f1y[t_] := 0;  regionOneBoundary = 38*^-3;  boundaryOneTime[\[Gamma]_] :=    NSolve[regionOneBoundary == f1x[t0, \[Gamma]], t0]; t1[\[Gamma]_] := Re[t0 /. boundaryOneTime[\[Gamma]][[1]]];  f2x[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    regionOneBoundary +     r[\[Gamma]]*Sin[\[Omega][\[Gamma]] (t - t1[\[Gamma]])]; f2y[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    r[\[Gamma]]*Cos[\[Omega][\[Gamma]] (t - t1[\[Gamma]])] - r[\[Gamma]];  regionTwoBoundary = regionOneBoundary + regionTwoWidth;  boundaryTwoTime[\[Gamma]_] :=    NSolve[regionTwoBoundary == f2x[t0, \[Gamma]], t0]; t2[\[Gamma]_] := Re[t0 /. boundaryTwoTime[\[Gamma]][[1]]];  v3x[\[Gamma]_] := D[f2x[t, \[Gamma]], t] /. {t -> t2[\[Gamma]]}; v3y[\[Gamma]_] := D[f2y[t, \[Gamma]], t] /. {t -> t2[\[Gamma]]};  f3x[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    regionTwoBoundary + v3x[\[Gamma]]*(t - t2[\[Gamma]]); f3y[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    f2y[t2[\[Gamma]], \[Gamma]] + v3y[\[Gamma]]*(t - t2[\[Gamma]]);  boundaryThreeTime[\[Gamma]_] := t2[\[Gamma]] + 1.*^-10;  totalXFunc[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    Piecewise[{{f1x[t, \[Gamma]],       0 < t < t1[\[Gamma]]}, {f2x[t, \[Gamma]],       t1[\[Gamma]] < t <= t2[\[Gamma]]}, {f3x[t, \[Gamma]],       t2[\[Gamma]] < t < \[Infinity]}}]; totalYFunc[t_, \[Gamma]_] :=    Piecewise[{{f1y[t], 0 < t < t1[\[Gamma]]}, {f2y[t, \[Gamma]],       t1[\[Gamma]] < t <= t2[\[Gamma]]}, {f3y[t, \[Gamma]],       t2[\[Gamma]] < t < \[Infinity]}}]; 

Then I call the ParametricPlot function with

ParametricPlot[{totalXFunc[t, (22.)/g], totalYFunc[t, (22.)/g]}, {t,    0, boundaryThreeTime[22/g]}, PlotRange -> {{0, .1}, {0, -.07}}] 

Dataset Theme Issue

In watching Stephen Wolfram introduce Vers. 12.3, I installed the upgrade from 12.2 and executed the following statement as he did in his presentation:

In[9]:= Dataset[IdentityMatrix[6], DatasetTheme -> "AlternatingColumnBackgrounds", LightGreen]

However, unlike him, I see the following output in which the return is merely the list of the 6 by 6 identity matrix rather than the expected visualization seen in his presentation, but with the standard lightgreen color box being converted to its defining RGB color.

Dataset[{{1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1}}, DatasetTheme -> "AlternatingColumnBackgrounds", RGBColor[ 0.88, 1, 0.88]]

The frontend reports no errors as to the synatax.

What am I missing here to make this work as expected? Is there a hidden option value or environmental variable that needs to be set properly before execution to succeed?

Is this a bug?

Import from CSV formatting issue

I have two lists of data here: dm and dmHalo (see attached image). Theses are the same lists, the only difference is that dm was exported to a csv file and then reimported, while dmHalo was generated in the notebook session.

When I go to run an interpolation on the data set the interpolation does not recognize the csv imported data, as seen in the error message. I assume this is due to a change in formatting, but I am at a loss at how to revert to the native format.

Does anyone have an idea of how to do this?

Thanks you for your help!

enter image description here

VERY strange issue with Instagram

There's a strange bug I've been hitting lately on Instagram.
Certain mutual followers not showing up, or very far down the list.

Say there is an account @x that is followed by a close friend of mine (@y). I follow @y and @y follows me back. It doesn't matter if I follow @x or not.

Before, when I would open @x's page, I would see "Followed by @y, @z + 42 more". But that no longer happens. For some reason @y is not in this short list of mutual followers. Also, when I open the full list of…

VERY strange issue with Instagram

Issue with re-assigning values for ParallelTable

I am solving a differential equation of two closed functions using ParallelTable.

For the attached code, I thought the computation time should be approximately proportional to ltau, because the k is iterated once. However, the time is roughly proportional to square of ltau. I think that Total[s[[1;;i,i]]] in the reassignment of r drags computation. I thought I should use Unevaluated for Total[s[[1;;i,i]]] to reduce time, but it doesn’t work. Would you help me with this? Is there any better way to improve the parallelization? I assume the parallelization should reduce the computation time for two iterations in i and j.

ClearAll["Global`*"];  S = {}; RR = {};  lz = 10.; ltau = 1000.;  AbsoluteTiming[ r = ParallelTable[1., {i, lz}]; s = ParallelTable[0., {i, lz}, {j, lz}]; Do[AppendTo[RR, r]; AppendTo[S, s]; If[k == ltau, Break,  s = ParallelTable[  s[[i, j]] + (r[[i]]*Total[s[[1;;i,j]]]+r[[j]]*Total[s[[i,1;;j]]])+    If[i >j, r[[i]]*(1 + r[[j]])/2, r[[j]]*(1 + r[[i]])/2], {i, lz}, {j, lz}]; r = ParallelTable[r[[i]] - Total[s[[1 ;; i, i]]], {i, lz}];];, {k, 1, ltau}];] 

Duplicate Content Issue

I am reaching you once again. I have a question regarding duplicate content. I have multiple domain websites where all the websites associated with a group. Here is the website: https://www.cordlifeindia.com/

All the contents of the website are the same with a different domain such as .co.id, .co.mm, .co.bd and so on. So my question is that will google penalize for that reason? I haven’t implemented href lang tags.

Please go through this website and let me know.

Thanks, Olivia

MongoDB index issue

I have a simple collection that contains two fields: timestamp and value (float). I need to get min and max values in the timestamp range. The collection contains approx 10000000 documents. I’ve add indexes like {"value" : 1, "timestamp" : 1} and {"value" : -1, "timestamp" : 1}. Queries like db.getCollection('Sample').find({'timestamp' : {'$ gte': 1714284644, '$ lte': 1745820644}}).sort({'value':-1}).limit(1) took about 1 second. Count without limit shows 525600 documents. "Explain" show that query covered by one of the idexes. IXSCAN takes most of time. Is there any way to speed this query up?