My D&D 3.5 paladin took the Dragon Cohort feat in order to obtain the services of a gold dragon (and negotiate being allowed to use the cohort as a mount from time to time) but now I’m not sure what kind of dragon mount is allowed.
Given these premises:
- paladin character level 9
- lawful good alignment
- charisma modifier +4
- no Leadership feat
- no cohorts or followers lost
- no paladin mount (I took the Weapon Bond ACF instead)
- significant regional reputation (DM willing to add +1 to my Leadership score)
… I would expect my Leadership score to be 9 + 4 + 1 = 14. according to the Draconomicon p 139, table 3-14, a very young gold dragon is ECL 16 (although I expected ECL 17 based on the HD and LA listed in the srd) or ECL 13 with the Dragon Cohort feat.
Does this mean my paladin can have a sometimes-ridable very young gold dragon as a cohort or am I overlooking something?
I am not sure about the rideable part because the Draconomicon has one chapter on Dragons as Cohorts (referencing the Dragon Cohort feat, awesome) and one on Dragons as Mounts (referencing the Dragon Steed feat, terrible). However I’m not interested in the special mount summoning ability nor in arranging for a dragon lair on a celestial plane.
I will built and develop any kind of WordPress website whether you want e-commerce website or blog or business website. Just PM your details and I will start working straight away.
A table has three columns A, B, C these columns contain values with combination of both NULL and non NULL record in all columns.
Case 1- I want output of all records who does not have any single null value in any of the column.
case 2- I want output of all the records who have null values in any of the column but in query output should not return these null columns.
For related Question: Click here
I’m designing a Wood Elf Outlander Warlock (in DND 5E) who only has one hand. This makes my arm near to useless. As an Outlander, I am proficient with a musical instrument, and have skill proficiency in Survival.
I have designed the character as a self-sufficient hunter, who uses everything from a kill: hides for clothes, meat for food, and bones as a carving medium.
What I would like to do is trade the musical instrument proficiency for a proficiency with a type of artisan’s tools that would be used in carving bones into practical things I could use, or decorative items I could sell.
So… my question is: What kind of tools would be used for bone-carving?
Our webserver is forwarding HTTP GET request to application server as below including a statement or condition like “AND 1=1”, our Palo Alto Firewall detecting this traffic as SQL Injection alert.
PCAP is like below
Hypertext Transfer Protocol GET /cadocs/0/j027931e.pdf?resultnum=9&intcmp=searchresultclick AND 1=1 HTTP/1.0\r\n [Expert Info (Chat/Sequence): GET /cadocs/0/j027931e.pdf resultnum=9&intcmp=searchresultclick AND 1=1 HTTP/1.0\r\n]
Can you please explain me is webserver sending this “AND 1=1” in requests is bad practice how it can help attackers? What kind of modifications can be done from webserver or application server side to resolve this?
Thank You for your efforts…
I am looking to have the cryptography identified of this encrypted message
Any ideas what crypto was used here?
I’m offering SEO Optimized Articles, blog post or any kind of topic you need to write. I am a professional content writer and I will forward to providing you high quality, unique article up to 1000+ words at an extremely affordable price. Article Features: 100% Unique Content Perfect Grammer Reseache Based Fast Delivery Palaiagrism Free Content Keyword Optimized
Category: Article Writing
Vending machines at my workplace got recently changed and the new ones support an hybrid NFC\BT system to pay through a dedicated application.
Looking for online, I found some articles about this app being cracked and how it was done. Being several months later, I expected some new security measure to have been added so I decided to have a try and see if I could bypass them and repeat the process.
Original crack consisted of manually changing the data stored locally on a DB with a weak password, but since I don’t have a rooted phone and I have found traces of HTTPS requests being performed with checks on consistency on the credit, I decided to go another way.
Assumin vending machines do not connect online, I changed all the references to the remote REST endpoint (plain string constants) with a server of my own and I have successfully been able to login (or at least, make the app believe I logged in).
Now, assuming I fill the gaps and will be able to successfully buy stuff, is all this worth sharing with the developer, to have them take further security measures? Is there something serious they could do that would not require completely changing the infrastructure?
Hello. I hope you’re doing well. My name is Sandy Charity. I’ve been writing all sorts of letters for the past 3 years for different clients with different requirements. It’d be my pleasure to be a part of making your goals and objectives come true. Kindly provide me with all the necessary information/ideas that will enable the success of your project. I’ll be more than glad to help you put them into a thoughtful and convincing way that will make you and your target happy and satisfied. Would you also like to write a selling pitch for your business/product? I’ll help you write it down. Do you have a draft already? Share it and I’ll take from there. The letters that I professionally write/rewrite include, without limitation: Good-bye LettersCustody LettersCharacter LettersReference LettersI also write emails based on one’s requirements. Please place your order now or contact me for further information. Thank you
Category: Content & Writing
In Types and Programming Languages by Pierce, on p461 in Section 30.4 Fragments of
30.4.1 Deﬁnition: In System F1 , the only kind is
* and no quantiﬁcation (∀) or abstraction (λ) over types is permitted.
F1 is just our simply typed lambda-calculus,
λ → . Its deﬁnition is super- ﬁcially more complicated than Figure 9-1 because it includes kinding and type equivalence relations, but these are both trivial: every syntactically well formed type is also well kinded, with kind
*, and the only type equivalent to a type T is T itself
Is it correct that quantification
∀ means universal types?
* is the kind of proper types, which are introduced on p442:
The level of types contains two sorts of expressions. First, there are proper types like Nat, Nat→Nat, Pair Nat Bool, and ∀X.X→X, which are inhabited by terms. (Of course, not all terms have a type; for example (λx:Nat.x) true does not.)
So universal types such as
∀X.X→X are proper types, and thus belong kind
*. Why can System F1 have kind
*, but no universal types, i.e. quantification
But if System F1 could have kind
*, and quantification
∀, then wouldn’t it become the same as System F2?
In System F2 , we still have only kind
* and no lambda-abstraction at the level of types, but we allow quantiﬁcation over proper types (of kind