I am listening to this now :
Trying to setup Windows Server 2019 as a RADIUS server. However, after configuring everything, “netstat -b” shows that the machine is not listening on any of the expected RADIUS ports (1812, 1645, 1813, 1646).
- Installed the “Network Policy and Access Services” role
Followed the “Configure VPN or Dial-up” wizard
Confirmed RADIUS configuration:
Confirmed “Network Policy Server” ports:
Confirmed the “Network Policy Server” service is running.
Result: “netstat -b” shows that the machine is not listening on any of the expected RADIUS ports (1812, 1645, 1813, 1646).
Have tried with no luck:
- Restarting the “Network Policy Server” service
I’m dealing with the situation when both the client and server are responding to various events from the user and need to be able to notify each other about these events. However, in socket communication, only one (the server) is calling
socket.listen() thus it cannot initiate communication, but can only respond to messages from the client. What if the server needs to inform the client of a particular event? Is the only solution to open two sockets on two different ports, so that both can simultaneously
listen()? Thank you very much in advance.
I created an remote event receiver to fire when app is installed on premise provider hosted app. I cannot use azure. While running on doing F5 the solution i get below exception:
Installation is in progress (00:00:05) Add-in failed to install, cleaning up... Successfully uninstalled the SharePoint Add-in. Add-in installation encountered the following errors: 27/5/2019 1:55:19 PM @"Error 1 CorrelationId: 92749c1f-6de5-4240-8511-775bf35fce38 ErrorDetail: The remote event receiver callout failed. ErrorType: Transient ErrorTypeName: Intermittent ExceptionMessage: There was no endpoint listening at https://localhost:44341/Services/AppEventReceiver.svc that could accept the message. This is often caused by an incorrect address or SOAP action. See InnerException, if present, for more details. Source: Common SourceName: Common App Deployment
Has anyone encountered this issue? Any help will be appreciated.
Having discovered the X-Frame-Options
sameorigin that stops a website from being shown in a iframe, I am trying to understand how far not having this header can go.
What I am not sure about is if it’s possible to have a evil website, which a JS keylogger embedded, and embed within it an iframe with a legitimate website.
Then, the user only see the legitimate website (which is itself stored inside an iframe), however the real website is listening to what is being typed, what is being clicked on, etc via JS.
Is such a scenario possible ? The reverse seems to be true, where you inject an iframe via an XSS attack, but is this way possible ?
This answer only suggest that it is possible to do so by injecting something via XSS, in an already existing website.
This code show a JS keylogger, however testing it on a dummy website doesn’t seem to work. I don’t have the time to debug this further, and am only interested in knowing if it is possible. A PoC would be nice however.
Generate 15000 Listening to your track with in 24 hours Woooo 15000 Listening to your track with in 24 hours for $ 5 Buy 2 Get 1 Free ## 15000 Listening ## Quick Delivery ## My service will increase your popularity ## Safe for your Track ## With best price ## Assurance of satisfaction # I can split the Views if you want to 5 Tracks. Order Now… And Get popular. Order Now… And Get popular.
Category: Audio & Music
When using an iOS device with a set of AirPods that have previously been paired, is the case also required whilst wearing them or can the buds be used without it?
Essay about susan b anthony ap english essay help
Order a quality paper and leave your worries behind – Writing Services – ORDER HERE
Verratti, Kroos and Wan-Bissaka here are the stars that could be coming to Old Trafford Olivia Wilde dazzles in sparkling green gown as she leads the stars at A Vigilante world premiere
Britain rebukes Huawei over security failings, discloses more flaws Kamala Harris is 'at a loss' over Jussie…
Does listening to music while doing homework help concentrate homework help math reasoning
I am making a docker image which I run locally and would like to test, this port exposes UDP 500/4500 for IKEv2/IPsec traffic. When I try to build this image and expose the above ports I get an authorization error – this is because the IKEEXT service listens on these ports and the Windows kernel prevents me from having them.
I’d like to change these port numbers to something else, so my docker container can take the ports for itself
I can stop the service but this would mean that I can’t use the native IKEv2/IPsec stack to connect to my container on the 500/4500 ports
I can change the port that the docker container listens on but that would mean changing the port I use from my IPsec client on the local device – which I also do not know how to do