Where is Gralhund Villa located within Waterdeep?

In Waterdeep: Dragon Heist, a significant portion of one of the chapters takes place in "Gralhund Villa".

There are locations given for several of the noble Houses in the first chapter, but I can’t find anything giving even an approximate location for Gralhund Villa. I’ve marked this question as 5e, but will accept information from any edition.

Where is Gralhund Villa located within Waterdeep?

Where is Zymorven Hall located?

I’ve found two maps of the Dessarin Vale, as shown below. The left one I’m almost sure of is an official map, although I do not know where it was published. The right one is an often found map, but I’m sure is an edited version of the High-Resolution Sword Coast map. It’s correct most of the time, but does contain errors here and there. Shown here you can see that where it puts "Settlestone", should have been "Winters Edge" (although not exactly). Likewise, on the official map High Hold seems to overlap with Zymorven Hall.

enter image description here

The thing that I’m trying to figure out is where Zymorven Hall is actually located. Ideally published map would be nice, but it may not exist. Second best is a description of where it would probably be.

How would I go about replacing this function in my child theme located in inc/template-tags.php

How would I replace this function that lies inside inc/template-tags.php in my parent theme

function theme_navigation() { ?>                  <div id="theme-nav-container">             <nav id="site-navigation" class="main-navigation">                 <?php wp_nav_menu( array('theme_location' => 'theme-studios-primary', 'menu_class' => 'sf-menu', 'fallback_cb' => false, 'walker'  => new theme ) ); ?><div class="clearfix-pro"></div>             </nav>             <div class="clearfix-pro"></div>         </div>                  <!-- close #theme-nav-container -->                   <?php } 

There is no add action that it is hooked on to, there is no check to see if the function already exists. How would I replace it without touching the parent theme. I have removed much of the code in the function for brevity but I think it still makes sense.

Thanks ahead of time

The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference

Después de crear un Banco de Datos en el Microsoft SQL Server, estoy intentado hacer la Ingeniería Reversa con una aplicación ASP.NET Core (Aplicación web MVC) en el Visual Studio.

Por defecto ya está instalado los paquetes *Microsoft.AspNetCore.App (3.00) * y el Microsoft.NetCore.App (3.00)

Puse también el Microsoft.EntityFramework.SqlServer (3.00) y el Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools (3.00)

Todos en sus últimas versiones (septiembre de 2019), incluso el SDK es 3.0.100 preview 009812 y el ASP.NET Core es el 3.0.

El ERROR

En la Consola del Administrador de paquetes NUGET busqué el servidor con Autenticación de Windows:

Scaffold-DbContext “Server=NombreServidor;Database=nombreDB;Trusted_Connection=True;” Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer -OutputDir Models

Pero el mensaje de retorno es

Could not load file or assembly ‘netstandard, Version=2.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=cc7b13ffcd2ddd51’. The located assembly’s manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

No he encontrado una solución hasta ahora. Ya eché un vistazo en la localización, hice el BD de nuevo, inicié un proyecto nuevo outras veces, he instalado algunas librerías, el FrameWork Design, etc y hasta ahora nada. ¿Alguna sugerencia? Muy Amable.

17.10.1 repository Artful Aardvark appears to have been changed and is no longer located where it was

The 17.10.1 repository Artful Aardvark appears to have been changed and is no longer located where it was. None of the standard repository locations have 17.10 Artful located in them.

Behold, my sudo apt-get update results:

me@name:~$   sudo apt-get update  Ign:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful InRelease Hit:2 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu artful InRelease                      Ign:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-security InRelease               Ign:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-updates InRelease              Hit:5 http://ppa.launchpad.net/eugenesan/ppa/ubuntu artful InRelease            Ign:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-backports InRelease            Hit:7 https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/ubuntu artful InRelease                 Err:8 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-security Release                   404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1560:8001::11 80] Get:9 https://deb.opera.com/opera-stable stable InRelease [2,591 B]             Ign:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-proposed InRelease            Err:11 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful Release                         404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1562::19 80] Hit:12 http://ppa.launchpad.net/font-manager/staging/ubuntu artful InRelease    Err:13 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-updates Release                 404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1562::19 80] Err:14 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-backports Release               404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1562::19 80] Err:15 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-proposed Release                404  Not Found [IP: 2001:67c:1562::19 80] Hit:16 http://ppa.launchpad.net/noobslab/apps/ubuntu artful InRelease           Ign:17 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease                   Hit:18 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable Release               Hit:19 http://ppa.launchpad.net/rodsmith/refind/ubuntu artful InRelease Reading package lists... Done                     E: The repository 'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-security Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. E: The repository 'http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. E: The repository 'http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-updates Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. E: The repository 'http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-backports Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. E: Repository 'https://deb.opera.com/opera-stable stable InRelease' changed its 'Origin' value from 'Opera Software ASA' to 'Opera Software AS' N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository can be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details. E: The repository 'http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful-proposed Release' no longer has a Release file. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details. me@name:~$    

Right now, I’m not concerned about Opera web browser. I did find this though:

http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/artful/

How do I add this to the repository lookup when I do an update? I know I have to go into the “Software & Updates” part of the Software package program, and add it under “Other Software”. But it tells me it has to be a complete APT line, where

“The APT line includes the type, location and components of a repository, for example ‘deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful main’.”

I’m at a loss as to what to do next. Should I downgrade to 16.04 seeing that it’s still supported? The only reason I upgraded to 17.10 was because I was having audio issues using 16.04. The logical solution would be to upgrade to 18.04, except my hardware might not be able to handle it.

Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.

How to use known Projection Matrices of cameras to generate new fundamental matrix located correctly in 3D space?

I have a few cameras which have been calibrated (using a checkerboard) so I know the fundamental matrix between an origin camera and each remaining camera

I wish to take pairs of camera with no fundamental matrix – but each has a projection matrix – and calculate the fundamental matrix with the view to reconstruct the stereo pair in 3D. To clarify – as all cameras have a projection matrix – I should be able to take any combination and generate a Fundamental matrix – so I can reconstruct and combine stereo pairs in 3D using as many pairs as possible

currently I use this formula: enter image description here

(decomposing Projection matrices from camera to get C)

but that didn’t quite work with stereo pairs that don’t include the origin. I noticed that to calculate the fundamental matrix that rotation was relative so I added the relative rotation formula when recalculating P from K/R/T (intrinsic camera params, Rotation matrix, Translation matrix)

enter image description here

but now each reconstruction appears on the camera position (I think) instead of all stereo pairs being mapped into same space to give a dense reconstruction

Does anyone know what I am doing wrong? thanks for any help