I’m planning to play a Tiefling Hexblade with Levistus bloodline. The weapon of this Hexblade should be inhabited by an entity that was sent by Levistus. What entity could that be? Demons don’t work together with Devils, so that’s not an option. Another devil? Is it possible for a lower devil to inhabit objects? A ghost like entity seems wrong, too.
The Message spell requires a short piece of copper wire to cast. Suppose you do not have access to a spell component pouch. Where might copper wire exist? And how might it be used outside of spellcasting?
I was not sure whether I should post this here or if I should take this question to the world-builders, but since it pertains more of the mechanical side of things I felt this was the right place:
I recently acquired a campaign setting in which there are no more gods and all that is left divine-wise are their divine/unholy servants, the arch-seraphs and arch-daemons. While brainstorming campaign-ideas I came up with remnants of the dead gods which are spread around the world, news of which spark a huge amount of conflict in the scramble for the last remnants of the truely divine. I got most of it fleshed out lore-wise, but i am kind of stumped with the powers of the remnants. I plan to make the remnants contain different divine domains, namely Creation, Destruction, Renewal and Fate, but I do not know what powers these artifacts should possess, considering that my players probably will get their hands on at least one or two of them. I have vague ideas for Renewal and Fate: for Renewal I would be going in the direction of restoration, healing, maybe refilling used powers, Fate could be predicting fate (some kind of divination magic maybe?) and/or changing fate (forcing/allowing rerolls perhaps)? For the other two, I do not seem to be able to come up with even the broadest strokes of thematicly fitting powers (apart from being able to cast domain spells, those feel like a given, but not like they are enough).
TLDR: My questions are these:
- What powers apart from casting domain-spells could artifacts containing the divine domain of Creation, Destruction, Renewal or Fate possess? Consider that players will most likely get their hands an a few of them.
- How powerful should the spellcasting of the artifacts be? My naive first idea would be 20-ish, since they would be fueled by the divine domain of a true god, but depending on when the players get their hands on them that could destroy the power-balance…
- What are your thoughts on making the artifacts semi-sentient to fully sentient?
I found this hard cover book and wasn’t really sure on what it was. So I called a friend and he said it was "a rare edition" and that I could get quite a bit of money out of it.
the back cover and the inside are printed with the following:
Advanced Dungeons and Dragons Monster Manual. Special Reference Work. 4th Edition, August, 1979. Hard Cover.
An alphabetical compendium of all the monsters found in advanced Dungeons & Dragons, including attacks, damage, special abilities, and descriptions.
By Gary Gygax 1977, 1978 -TSR Games
Gently used. Binding is in perfect condition. No rips, tears, or folds.
Over 350 Monsters This book provides a complete alphabetical listing of all "monsters" encountered in the various works which comprise the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons game system. It is an invaluable aid to players and dungeon masters alike!
As far as I know, the multiverse of D&D 5E consists in different worlds all residing in the Material Plane, but the rest of the planes (Transitive Planes, Inner Planes, Outer Planes…) are shared between them.
Is there a lore explanation why each setting might have different deities? Since deities exist in planes other than the Material Plane, shouldn’t those deities be the same in every setting?
My players got into an interesting philosophical debate about the nature of Fiends that, in a rather roundabout way, boiled down to the question of Nature vs. Nurture — does Fiendish blood make one innately and irredeemably evil, or can a herculean effort ultimately move the needle towards selflessness?
As these things go, the discussion concluded with a harebrained scheme: to become “besties” with a demon.
I know that by 5e’s cosmology, the answer is clearly, “No. Evil outsiders is as Evil outsiders does.” But the campaign is nearing its end, and if anyone has a shot of pulling this off, well, you could do worse than a 19th level bard with his reputation on the line!
I’m looking for suggestions on what our intrepid idealist might do to both attract, capture, and then consume the attention of one or more “friends in low places”, and any guidance on what kind of notice this might garner from other interested parties — slaying jealous rival fiends seems sure to come up, but would these extraplanar exploits garner any recognition from the upper planes?
What could our dear, deluded bard offer that a demoness couldn’t lie, steal, or slaughter for herself?
I don’t usually feel competent enough to ask decent questions, let alone answer one here. But, this is rather urgent, so please be patient with me:
I CANNOT tell if the “secure encrypted message” I got in an email from a “state agency” was genuine or malware! I was somewhat (reluctantly) expecting an email from that department and their email signature appeared genuine. Unfortunately, they may or may not have attached that file, which purportedly contained the message body as an *.EML “secure attachment message”.
I couldn’t open the secure message attachment, which was the first clue of something amiss. (I also do NOT want to call them, and then have them read me the message, which would trigger a conversation I’m not prepared for, without first knowing what the message was about.)
As I started working hard to open the attachment. As I failed and researched more, my findings appeared more and more ominous. I will keep this question UPDATED with any missing details.
- Received seemingly valid email from a known state agency, known person, known division I do business with.
- Plain text message body:
“Please find the attached.” [?? Odd wording –> “‘FIND‘ the attached” ??]
- The [real] message was attached, encrypted, and only viewable by the email recipient that it was addressed to. The attachment then had to be opened by the email client, (Gmail-web). I’ve done this before once or twice, so it is a pain, but not unheard of.
- Email ATTACHMENT was then “viewed in a an NEW WINDOW” in Chrome and Vivaldi with similar if not the same results: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?????????????..[etc.]/: WHICH SAID:
[ERROR MESSAGE FROM GOOGLE MAIL:]
“You are viewing an attached message. COMPANY Mail can’t verify the authenticity of attached messages. Your document has been completed”
“VIEW COMPLETED DOCUMENTS:”
[LINK GOES TO: https://www.notion.so/(KNOWN_AGENCY_-_GUID)/]
“Ms. [known person]”
“[Known State Agency]”
- After clicking on the link from the popup shown above, it opened a new TAB in my email browser’s page at this URI: https://www.notion.so/(KNOWN_AGENCY_-_GUID)/ which said the following:
“[KNOWN STATE AGENCY]”
“This PDF is password protected ,” “[KNOWN PERSON] sent you an important vital file to review.”
“REVIEW FILE HERE:”
[LINK GOES TO: https://fafanfan.tk/000/nsw/data/UntitledNotebook1.html ]
“Please take a look and let me know if these are ready to print.”
[ HUH?? Why let you know?? And, why print, instead of view?? ]
“Kindly open with your professional email.”
[ HUH?? “Kindly”, “Professional email”?? Who talks like this?? ]
“Login with your email and password to view file.”
- So, then I clicked on the email link and TRIED to log into my company GMAIL account.
- It appeared to log into my account successfully, but then said I had to verify my account and to provide [either the] recovery phone or recovery email address
- I provided a valid phone #, which failed with an error.
- Then I tried my valid recovery email address, which also failed with an error.
- I tried both Vivaldi and Chrome, and all failed each time. (I assumed that it opened a window without cookies, so the login to Google was from a new, unknown page.)
At this point, I started Googling the URI’s and other things —
- Hmmm strange domains [TLD].TK ?? Searched the URI = NO hits.
- Searched [TLD].TK — not good — It said 95% of the .TK traffic is malware / spam.
- Searched the other URI shown above = NO hits. NOT cool.
- I changed all my email PW’s. I checked for odd logins, but saw nothing odd. (If I provided my credentials to the bad guys, they are a bit slow today. So maybe I dodged a bullet.)
- I Checked/scanned the downloaded file with Windows Defender — no detection
- I submitted the file to Virus Total — no detection by anyone.
- I also submitted the two URI’s shown above, and came up with only one hit from an unknown security company, who likely flagged the *.TK as possibly a “bad URI”.
At this point, I’m not at all sure what to do… I do NOT want to call them and start a conversation that might later deny “plausible deniability that I received this notice”. OTOH, I can’t ignore it too long, either.
RANT: I hate all these “protections”, that invite malware to be easily inserted. Then, you are relying on ordinary users to figure out if the attachments are safe?? Few users are smart enough, and I know that I’m not. (Although I’m not a total security idiot, as I’m more cautious and knowledgeable most than anyone I know.)
If Adobe wants to provide tools like this, fine. Then please make it much easier and obviously safe for both senders and [very novice] readers. For instance, use Adobe.com URI’s and never TLD’s that are also used for malware. If providing security tools, please don’t rely on these agencies’ IT staff to try to train equip their users to properly use these tools with the public, most of whom have never opened a “secure attachment”, let alone know how to open them (OR NOT), safely.
Because of COVID-19 our exclusively in-person sessions are going entirely online. We have downloaded roll 20, and we have voice chat, but beyond that we are fish out of water in the new medium.
What challenges might I expect from switching to online DMing from exclusively tabletop?
I have test question.
Which devices inside processor are used to speed up work indirectly i.e. program isn’t executing a code for that device?
Possible answers: DRAM | Cache | Pipeline | GPU | RAM | ARM | Stack | FPU
I think we can immediately say, that DRAM, GPU, & RAM is wrong picks, because they are not inside cpu – they are different parts of computer. Also stack is inside RAM, not CPU. So left answers are cache, pipeline, arm & fpu? Also not sure about floating point number.
About a week ago I configured my smartphone Access Point Name (APN) of the type APN protocol from including the value
IPv4 to including the value
IPv4/IPv6, all IP addresses I recognized for my smartphone were IPv6 addresses.
I didn’t change the value for the APN type APN roaming protocol → its value is still
I understand I can now have both IPv4 addresses and IPv6 addresses but the purpose of the following question is to understand the tendency I personally recognize for IPv6 (only?) addresses for my smartphone.
Why since I configured my smartphone APN protocol to IPv4/IPv6 I (might) only have IPv6 addresses? Is it a coincidence or the cause of some global standard cellular operators are now following?