I’m using Office for Mac version 16.25 (2019) on a Mac macOS High Sierra. Whenever I open a Word document or create a new file, it opens in a tiny window, which occupies less than 25% of the screen size. I can resize it, which is a pain, but if I close and reopen, the window again opens small.
I’ve found answers that involve editing the default template (.dot) file. This has no effect. What used to be easy now appears impossible.
How do I resolve this issue?
If I upload an ASPX file to the documents library in a regular SharePoint site, it renders properly when a user clicks on the file.
If I do the same for an ASPX file uploaded to the documents library in a SharePoint site that backs an Office 365 Group, the ASPX file is not rendered, but downloaded instead. Is there any way to get SharePoint to render ASPX files?
- Setting the “Default open behavior for browser-enabled documents” in the advanced library settings to “open in the browser” does not help.
- A SharePoint site behind an Office 365 group has a Pages library that obviously allows ASPX files. I am unable to upload to that library via the browser, but I suspect I could do this via code. I wonder if there is some specific setting on the document library that turns on this behavior. If so, I couldn’t find it.
- I am aware of permissive file handling and that the default value for this does not allow rendering of HTML files. However, this does not appear to affect ASPX files. Interestingly, I am now unable to perform a
set-spotenant -PermissiveBrowserFileHandlingOverride $ true in my test tenant. I get back a message indicating that “Permissive browser file handling setting is deprecated and can’t be enabled.”
I have a situation where the authenticity of emails sent and received to an Office 365 account is being questioned. The claim is that the email conversation (a back and forth of about a dozen emails) was either created through software to make it appear to be between the two parties or the contents of the emails themselves were after the fact altered. I know for a fact that the emails were sent and received by the claimed two parties and that no alterations were made in any way to the contents. Perhaps relevant to the suggestion that the contents of the emails were altered, the emails (about a dozen) were sent in reply to each other (so the second email contained the first, the third contained the second and first etc.). The level of changes suggested to have been made would mean it would be immediately obvious to the receiver if they scrolled down that the chain underneath was substantially different to what they had previously authored.
Forensically, what can be done to prove (or if not provable, provide evidence in support of) the authenticity/non-spoofed nature of this email trail?
I have already pasted the headers into two online services (Microsoft and another) and they appear to provide confirmation that the servers used were as would be expected in an authentic back and forth. With respect to the headers though, it would/could be argued that they were simply altered to reflect an authentic trail – is that something that is easy or possible to do?
I could pull the logs from the Office 365 side – again, is it easy or possible to simply modify those log files to reflect an authentic trail?
The broader question, with only detailed access to one side of the communication (the Office 365 side), is there a way to be able to make an assertion that the email communications were consistent with the way they are presented and not representative of a spoofed/altered trail?
My forensic skills are limited, however I am able to access any files and information (e.g. headers) necessary from the Office 365 end. I also know certain details about the other end that may be able to help in confirming authenticity.
Any interest in helping me arrive at a decision as to confirming or otherwise the authenticity of these emails is greatly appreciated.
Background: The company I work for is
SOC2 and some other Compliant. So to comply with that regulatory compliance they asked us to install
SolarWinds RMM agent in our workstations (Not production server and we already have an antivirus installed). With that agent installed, they will see which process are running, maybe administrative access and other.
1st Problem: I keep some of my personal research and other files in my workstation as I spent most of my time in office. But I don’t feel good when someone pokes into my system (I know it’s not a good reason but ignore it for now).
What I did:
- Created two separate
LUKSpartition. One for
/,/home,/var,/tmp and other one for
/storage with a
.key file I have in my USB drive.
- Created an encrypted virtual machine [4GB+4CPU] with a passphrase in
/storage and keep all of my files in there.
2nd Problem: When I run
google-chrome-stable inside virtual machine or with
ssh -X, it tears a lot and I cannot even watch a video, listen audio or something. Browsing is the only problem I have been struggling with.
What have I tried: Installing chrome on a container and sandboxing with
selinux in the host machine. Tearing remains the same on the container and the main reason is it doesn’t solve the data issue. As if my employer wants my access, I have to give them my root password so they will have access on the host machine and hence my browser as well as my password manager.
So how can I access to media+browsing in this manner or something like this without compromising anything?
So the requirement is like this:
Login to o365 portal, navigate to health section ( this url https://portal.office.com/AdminPortal/Home#/servicehealth)
take the screenshot of the page
- upload the page in a sp lib/email it
Please let me know how to accomplish this. I know how to write a script to take the screenshot, but how to login in message center and upload the screenshot in sp lib.
Note: We have MFA enabled.
I just now upgraded SPFX from 1.7.1 to 1.8.2. I have referred office fabric UI css class like ms-grid, ms-GridRow, ms-u-md6 etc… before upgrading everything is working fine. But know office fabric UI is not at all coming. Any CSS from SPFabricore.scss is not getting into the page. I guess it is not importing any CSS from here.
I tried creating a new solution and checked the same issue happening in new solutions also. verion details as below
node version 10.16.0
npm version 6.9.0
Clicking on new item link on a list for most of my lists are showing popup but one of the list, which actually is exact copy of other lists, shows new item form in full window instead of a dialogue. I checked list settings and the new form in dialogue option is set to “YES”. Any other idea? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Press the "Download Now" button now. The whole process will just take a few moments.
Mirror Link —> DOWNLOAD CRACKED MICROSOFT OFFICE 2016 MAC
– Download type: safety (no torrent/no viruses)
– Status file: clean (as of last analysis)
– File size: undefined
– Price: free
– Special requirements: no…
download cracked microsoft office 2016 mac
I followed the steps given in the below article:
Created a Custom Master Page. Applied it to my App. Its working fine. But when I goto the master page gallery , I dont find the Master Page which I deployed through Visual Studio by adding a Module.
Below is the code in elements.xml file:
<File Path="MasterPages\Test.master" Url="_catalogs/masterpage/Test.master" Type="GhostableInLibrary" IgnoreIfAlreadyExists="False" ReplaceContent="True" />
I am not sure why I am unable to find this Master Page in the _catalogs/masterpage/Forms/AllItems.aspx
Thank You in advance.
I have “Office 365 E3 Developer” license which contains “SharePoint Online for Developer” license.
When I go to app catalog creation in sharepoint admin in office 365 sharepoin admin center (classic one as new one dows not contain app section) and then go to app catalog, create new, and fill out everything and then clock ok. I’m redirected back to app section of share point admin, but no site collection is created.
I tried this multiple times using edge and chrome.
Are there some changes that I missed so maybe I don’t need app catalog anymore for spfx developement anymore? If so – can you please post link to description of the changes, if not, what would be the best way to create app catalog?