Am I suppose to use a proxy when scraping proxies, all of them failed
This is method I used. Nothing else And this is fresh install of Scrapebox
I went ahead an checked if my ip is blacklisted anywhere I don’t think it is.
Is there a way I can export these results to have you take a look?
I have installed Oracle Database 19c Enterprise Edition on Oracle Linux 7.8.I am now trying to install Apex 20.1 .
Got to the chapter "188.8.131.52 Running apxchpwd.sql" to set the instance administrator password. Executed the
@apxchpwd.sql command, it asks me for user name, e-mail and password but then it gives an error as if the password does not have enough complexity, although the password I provide is literally
H29dN8%Ih^^IV$ Y3$ j4Mx. Tried various other passwords, nothing seems to be acceptable.
What can be the problem?
Here is how I got to the error:
[oracle@oraclemachine apex]$ sqlplus /nolog SQL*Plus: Release 184.108.40.206.0 - Production on Tue Aug 25 09:50:03 2020 Version 220.127.116.11.0 Copyright (c) 1982, 2019, Oracle. All rights reserved. SQL> connect sys as sysdba Enter password: Connected. SQL> SQL> @apxchpwd.sql ...set_appun.sql ================================================================================ This script can be used to change the password of an Application Express instance administrator. If the user does not yet exist, a user record will be created. ================================================================================ Enter the administrator's username [ADMIN] apexadmin User "apexadmin" does not yet exist and will be created. Enter apexadmin's email [apexadmin] email@example.com Enter apexadmin's password  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PASSWORD_COMPLEXITY_ERROR * PASSWORD_ONE_ALPHA_ERR * PASSWORD_ONE_PUNCTUATION_ERR * PASSWORD_ONE_UPPER_ERR * PASSWORD_ONE_LOWER_ERR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- declare * ERROR at line 1: ORA-20001: Password validation failed. ORA-06512: at line 30 ORA-06512: at "APEX_200100.WWV_FLOW_FND_USER_INT", line 3744 ORA-06512: at line 20
From my client I received ftp account and sample listing, that credentials are valid:
ubuntu@ip-CLIENT_IP:~$ ftp CLIENT.REMOTE.SERVER Connected to CLIENT.REMOTE.SERVER. 220 ProFTPD Server (ProFTPD) [CLIENT.SERVER.IP] Name (CLIENT.REMOTE.SERVER:ubuntu): SERVERUSER 331 Password required for SERVERUSER Password: 230 User SERVERUSER logged in Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> ls 200 PORT command successful 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection...
Who to connect in filezilla with provided ftp credentials ?
By "identify", I mean to access personally identifying information associated with the subscriber of the given phone number. It appears that PayPal does this, since they allow a phone number to be used to verify full name (and possibly address); they verify that the full name provided (and possibly address, I’ve forgotten) matches the full name associated with the phone number that the user provides for verification.
I assume this information is not entirely public. Which entities are allowed to access it? Is there a central registry maintained by the service providers? Can anyone access it?
I am curious in particular whether "lower-level businesses or websites" (relative to PayPal, which presumably has some kind of legal obligation/status with regards to identity verification) which a user might provide their phone number to, such as dating apps, messaging apps, social media, etc, are able to access this information. (personally identifying subscriber information)
I can’t wrap my head around this statement.
It’s from here.
One common drawback of using composition instead of inheritance is that methods being provided by individual components may have to be implemented in the derived type, even if they are only forwarding methods
I want to allow crawling of my website only if the URL starts with accepted region/language combinations which are
fr/fr. Other language combinations must be restricted. On the other hand crawler should be able to crawl
/about, etc. For example:
example.com/us/en/videos # should be allowed example.com/de/en/videos # should be blocked example.com/users/mark # should be allowed
Again, it should be blocked only if it starts with unaccepted region/language combinations. What I did so far does not work:
Disallow: /*? Disallow: /*/*/cart/ Disallow: /*/*/checkout/ Disallow: /*/*/ Allow: /*.css? Allow: /*.js? Allow: /us/en/ Allow: /gb/en/ Allow: /fr/fr/
I tested it with google’s online robots.txt tester.
Assume that I have a Java web application with
- JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.x
- which uses XHTML files (so called Facelets) with the Java Expression language 
In the current configuration, it is possible to access the XHTML files over the web server. According to , it is possible to prevent such an access.
Do you see any relevant threats towards the current configuration?
I could image the following:
- Information disclosure of secrets, if such secrets are stored in the XHTML file
- Information disclosure of variable names, which are parsed when rendering the XHTML
- Information disclosure of relevant business logic, if such logic is part of the XHTML file (which would be bad code style)
If you cast a spell with a bonus action, you can’t cast a spell with a casting time of one action (PHB, p. 202):
A spell cast with a bonus action is especially swift. You must use a bonus action on your turn to cast the spell, provided that you haven’t already taken a bonus action this turn. You can’t cast another spell during the same turn, except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action
Does this apply to ongoing spells that provide an action after being cast?
A beam of brilliant light flashes out from your hand in a 5-foot-wide, 60-foot-long line. Each creature in the line must make a Constitution saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 6d8 radiant damage and is blinded until your next turn. On a successful save, it takes half as much damage and isn’t blinded by this spell. Undead and oozes have disadvantage on this saving throw.
You can create a new line of radiance as your action on any turn until the spell ends.
For the duration, a mote of brilliant radiance shines in your hand. It sheds bright light in a 30-foot radius and dim light for an additional 30 feet. This light is sunlight.
A beam of crackling, blue energy lances out toward a creature within range, forming a sustained arc of lightning between you and the target. Make a ranged spell attack against that creature. On a hit, the target takes 1d12 lightning damage, and on each of your turns for the duration, you can use your action to deal 1d12 lightning damage to the target automatically
Am I wrong an interpreting this as allowing to cast a spell as a bonus action on the same turn as the actions provided by these spells?
- Turn 1: I cast sunbeam
- Turn 2: I cast hunter’s mark, then use the action provided by sunbeam to create a new beam.
We have added a AD group which has sysadmin access to the instance, but when I try to connect I get this error message. Not sure what went wrong. Tried deleting group and adding it back to sql instance but no change.
Hello guys I’m new to Mathematica can someone help me out in Solving this question whether to use the Solve or the findRoot and if we are using the findRoot can someone help me in understanding the findRoot
Here is my solution:
Is this right??