I’m studying the MIPS , i have one question that how can the register file get two instruction and write to the two instruction in one cycle ? can i add a new data bus to the second instruction ? (the instruction is POP R1,R2 ) that what it do (1.R2=R2-4 2.R1=M[R2] )
Currently using SharePoint 2007 Standard with a pending upgrade into SharePoint Online.
Can anyone advise of any off the shelf products that’ll deal with Asset Registration? I’m more than aware that this sort of thing can easily be done OOB with custom lists / forms but I’ve been asked to provide some alternative paid / commercial for comparison.
I’ll be checking SharePointReviews of course but if anyone has used such a product and had a good experience with it, it would be useful to know of it.
Thanks in advance Steven
I am a new student at computer architectures and my current task is to create a register of 4 bits.
We were a working DFF and my bit component seems to work.
I tried to create the register by splitting the data into 4 bits and use the Bit component on each of them:
And it works while the load is 1, but when I change the load to 0 the output value – the value of q – is 15 (4 bits of 1).
Any ideas about why? thanks
I’m adding support for handling
telnet:// links to my application, what is the best way in regards to the user experience for doing so?
The application runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and doesn’t have “wizard” installers on any of them. On Windows, double-clicking the application uses the standard Squirrel installer (think Atom, Github Desktop, etc) – which just shows a gif while installing and then launches the application. As hassle-free as you can be, and it’s a similar experience on macOS and Linux.
This leaves a dilemma, what to do with the URI registration?
- if it’s to only be done via preferences, then of course the question is do we enable it by default or no
- if it’s not enabled by default, users for the large part have no reason to enable it, so most won’t have it on and thus the
telnet://handling will be pointless
- if it is enabled by default, and that happens to override another application that’s already registered, then we’ll be a bad citizen
- if we ask the user on the first launch what to do: well, the first launch is an overwhelming experience as it is, getting asked about
telnet://handling will just add to that
Happy to hear thoughts and feedback on this, thanks!
Suppose a processor lacks STACK Pointer Register. But, It does have STACK. Then, in my opinion, a program will still be able to call subroutines but, will be unable to return back from the subroutines. Please do clarify me where I have made a wrong assumption. Also do mention the possible outcomes of the scenario.
Trying to figure out the best way to do this. Hope I can get some help. So I am developing a plugin which handles a custom post type of cars. I am looking to add. A couple of category taxonomies related to the CPT ie Model and Make. I have been able to successfully add the model taxonomy like so:
//model taxonomy options $ model_labels = array( 'name' => _x( 'Models', 'taxonomy general name' ), 'singular_name' => _x( 'Model', 'taxonomy singular name' ), 'search_items' => __( 'Search Models' ), 'all_items' => __( 'All Models' ), 'parent_item' => __( 'Parent Model' ), 'parent_item_colon' => __( 'Parent Model:' ), 'edit_item' => __( 'Edit Model' ), 'update_item' => __( 'Update Model' ), 'add_new_item' => __( 'Add New Model' ), 'new_item_name' => __( 'New Model Name' ), 'menu_name' => __( 'Models' ), 'back_to_items' => __( '? Back to models' ), ); // Now register the taxonomy register_taxonomy('models','car', array( 'hierarchical' => true, 'labels' => $ model_labels, 'show_ui' => true, 'show_admin_column' => true, 'query_var' => true, 'rewrite' => array( 'slug' => 'model' ), ));
Now the question is how do I go about registering a separate “make” taxonomy as the parent of the “model” taxonomy? Is that possible with WordPress? Ie having a “category > subcategory > post” setup? Hope that makes sense.
When we look at models of computation – we come down into two broad categories:
- Tape-based machines
- Register based machines
We also see that any computer program can be run on the Rule-100 Automaton. (ie it is Turing Complete).
My question is: Is the Rule 110 Cellular Automaton a Register Machine or a Tape-based Turing Machine?
About the Sequence Diagram above, judge the following items:
I.The internal actor is the “Company”, which is responsible for informing the data to perform the business registration.
II.As initial interface, the class “Register Company” is used. To register the companies, it is understood that the objects “Branch of Activity” and “Zip Code” are already registered.
For each object represented, it can be seen that a “lifeline” has begun, and when the object begins to interact, the focus of control is used, which has its messages in a numbered and orderly manner.
IV.After the execution of the operations, the receiving object “Company” sends a return message to the sender interface “Form_Cadastrar Empresa”, represented in the dashed line.
The correct items are:
I will keep it abstract here because I am more interested in a pattern rather than a specific implementation.
I want to create an object that will listen to state changes from a event-driven framework and then build a register of all the states and keep them updated. The goal is that other object will be able to procedurally access the states. Now let’s say I only want to update a state if an object will use it (performance ?). So I want other objects to notify the state register that it has to listen to a certain state in particular. Now, that’s where the problem start, I want objects to be able to notify the state register that they no longer need a state.
How to keep track of which states need to be updated so that a state is kept up to date if and only if another object wants it.
I probably use the wrong vocabulary, so correcting me would already help me.
The practical example that prompted this question is a keyboard: I can listen to key presses and key releases, but I want to convert those to a Keyboard object with isKeyPressed() methods.
Thanks for your answers
A Ghost (MM, p. 147) can possess a humanoid as per their Possession action:
Possession (Recharge 6). One humanoid that the ghost can see within 5 feet of it must succeed on a DC 13 Charisma saving throw or be possessed by the ghost; the ghost then disappears, and the target is incapacitated and loses control of its body. The ghost now controls the body but doesn’t deprive the target of awareness. The ghost can’t be targeted by any attack, spell, or other effect, except ones that turn undead, and it retains its alignment, Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma, and immunity to being charmed and frightened. It otherwise uses the possessed target’s statistics, but doesn’t gain access to the target’s knowledge, class features, or proficiencies. […]
A paladin’s Divine Sense (PHB, p. 84) says:
The presence of strong evil registers on your senses like a noxious odor, and powerful good rings like heavenly music in your ears. As an action, you can open your awareness to detect such forces. Until the end of your next turn, you know the location of any celestial, fiend, or undead within 60 feet of you that is not behind total cover. You know the type (celestial, fiend, or undead) of any being whose presence you sense, but not its identity (the vampire Count Strahd von Zarovich, for instance). […]
If a humanoid was possessed by a ghost, then a paladin were to enter the room and use their Divine Sense, would the humanoid register as undead (or the undead nature of the ghost still otherwise show up on the paladin’s “radar”, such as detecting undead within the humanoid or something like that) or would the possession effectively render the ghost immune to being detected by Divine Sense?