Search Result by filter does not find an existing and crawled document

This is related to SP 2013 On-Premises. We have a custom Search Page and we use Keyword-Query to filter the Result. The related document which cannot be found by that page has at least two meta data fields assigned (both managed metadata) and can be found by regular search and also by Search-API, like so:’PRDBGerKlasse:”306″‘&RowLimit=’10’&SelectProperties=’Title,Path,PRDBGerKlasse,PRDBGerTyp,PRDBGerArt’

The document has “306” for PRDBGerKlasse and “TypeA 300” for PRDBGerTyp. When we then call the page by

the document is not in the search Result. If we call the page without the filter, the document can be found.

What could cause such issue?

Please note that we added the item 306 two weeks ago to the relevant Term-Set. Could that be an issue with the crawler even if the document can be found by regular search?

Get Property value and display to people search result

This is for SharePoint 2013.

I’m new in this domain.

I have to realise an intranet with SharePoint 2013. I want to display a property in people search results.

I followed this post, it works well, I display the “location”.

But the problem is that it displays the value that is in “Central Administration –> Manage User Profiles”.

And I want to display the value that is in “Edit Profile” when you click on the name of someone (when you use the search for poeple e.g) and you go in his “Edit Profile”.

ps : sorry for my bad english.


This is the value in ProfAdminEdit.aspx (Central Administration –> Manage User Profiles). I display “C2” but I want the other value.

enter image description here

This is the value in EditProfile.aspx (in search navigation, I search e.g Lee and when I click on his name, I arrive on his personal site and there, I can “edit” his profil, I want the value that is here and not the value “C2”)

enter image description here

FromTensor + TensorContract gives unexpected result for a tensor product of vectors and a matrix

I have written a larger code that uses the TensorSimplify package written by Carl Woll for tensor manipulations. The code, however, produces unexpected results, which I have been able to narrow down to a few lines using TensorProduct and subsequently TensorContract and FromTensor. Here is a typical example in a standalone form (including installation of the package):

PacletInstall["TensorSimplify",    "Site" -> ""]; << TensorSimplify` $  Assumptions = {(u|v) \[Element] Vectors[d],A \[Element] Matrices[{d, d}]}; TensorContract[u\[TensorProduct]A\[TensorProduct]v, {{1, 3}, {2, 4}}] // FromTensor TensorContract[A\[TensorProduct]u\[TensorProduct]v, {{1, 4}, {2, 3}}] // FromTensor 

Both evaluation lines produce v.Transpose[A].u while I would in both cases expect v.A.u. Is there something trivial about the way that TensorContract or FromTensor works that I am misunderstanding?

Foreach result into WP_query

I know it may sound very strange as a question, but I would like to know if it is possible to insert the result of a foreach in WP_query


I would like to avoid doing the maintenance manually that every custom post type created must add the name of the custom post type to the post_type query, to be clear:


but instead get me the whole list of custom post types:

<?php $  args = array(     'public'   => true,     '_builtin' => false );  $  output = 'names'; // 'names' or 'objects' (default: 'names') $  operator = 'and'; // 'and' or 'or' (default: 'and')  $  post_types = get_post_types( $  args, $  output, $  operator ); echo $  post_types; if ( $  post_types ) { // If there are any custom public post types.      echo '<ul>';      foreach ( $  post_types  as $  post_type ) {         echo '<li>' . $  post_type . '</li>';     }      echo '<ul>';  } ?> 

and insert it into:

'post_type' => 

so that every time I create a custom post type I get a dynamic query

Is it possible to scrape a result from Google Search by using Mathematica?

my question is general. I would like to search a term on Google and scrape all the results, including the dates of publishing, if there are.
I know that it is possible to scrape a website – following the policy, of course!, and not breaking the rules – by using Python or other softwares. Is it possible to do this in Mathematica?

enter image description here

Basic SEO Setup for Advance result, Compulsory seo fundamental to bring website on first page for $39

Set up Google Analytics Set up Webmaster tools Set up XML Site Map Set up Roboot text file Set up favicon Set up SSL Set up Google My Business On Page Optimization Will Provide Details SEO Reports & Suggestion to improve Build 10 Landing Page Google Analytics ,Webmaster tools, XML Site Map, Reboot text, favicon ,SSL are important aspect of SEO, without these element your SEO is incomplete.

by: mudassirmshaikh
Created: —
Category: Local SEO
Viewed: 180

Custom List Result with Content Type=SPSPeople in SharePoint Online

Is it possible to get Custom List Result with Content Type=SPSPeople and display:

  1. Only the Custom List Result
  2. Merge Custom List Result and People Search result Using SharePoint Online

I tried the approach suggested in:

Workaround to show Contact items in People Search.

& the Responses in Mix two Result Sources in Search Results Web Part

But not able to proceed.
Appreciate your help.

Google Result Shows Archive Instead Of Title Tag

I have a problem with my review category.

My posts on other categories are shown in a normal way. I mean google shows title tags in the search result, but for the posts in review category, instead of showing title tags, it shows category and archive (course review Archives)enter image description here

of course, it happens when I type my title tag in the search result. for the above example, I type

advanced price action course (review+coupon)

and the result is the above picture. but when I type mentioned title tag plus my website name:

advanced price action course (review+coupon) offbeatforex

I can see the title tag instead of the archive version, however, the archive version still comes after that.

enter image description here

Does anybody know the answer? Your answer will be sedative for my burning mind 🙂 😀