Business Schengen VIsa Purpose Justification which will right reason

Require business Schengen visa for 22 days

case 1:

We hereby kindly ask you to issue a 6 months Schengen business visa for Mr. XYZ, aaa, bearer of passport number: aaa, issued by ttt on ddd, expiring on ddd.

Mr. XYZ who is employed by EEEE in since ABC 20XX with the position of Senior Software Engineer will arrive in Norway on ddd (estimated) and departure to HOME, on ddd (estimated).

QQQ is a client of EEEE for the past 4 years and the relationship is continuing to grow. Recently EEEE was awarded with new project from QQQ, which is a “DDD” and Mr. XYZ is invited to QQQ office to gather knowledge about the project and do a detailed discovery of current functionality and the requirements. As this is an App in Training category, it’s important that Mr. XYZ understands the requirements well before going back to HOME starting the development. There are many workshops and discussion sessions planned for understanding the design, receiving knowledge on equipment/manikins and taking guidance from QQQ team.

Case 2

We hereby kindly ask you to issue a 6 months Schengen business visa for Mr. XYZ, aaa, bearer of passport number: aaa, issued by ttt on ddd, expiring on ddd.

Mr. XYZ who is employed by EEEE in since ABC 20XX with the position of Senior Software Engineer will arrive in Norway on DDD (estimated) and departure to HOME, on DDD (estimated).

During his stay in Norway, Mr. XYZ will attend project initiation meetings and technical training in software development for the DDD project at QQQ Offices.

Which among two case is proper reason which will come under the Business Visa ?? Among 2 case of letter which has higher chance of getting visa ??

“right to work” visa for volunteering in the UK without invitation or sponsorship

I have been selected to volunteer for a sporting event in the UK. The organizer is not providing a formal invitation letter but have sent emails of my acceptance and my role and shift duration.

The organizer also wants me to have a “right to work” visa but without any support from their behalf.

So I was wondering which visa type should I apply for and found “Permitted paid engagement” to be the most suitable one ? I have experience of prior volunteering and events. So apart from invitation letter, I can provide other supporting documents.

(I have done international volunteer work in another country and I was provided an invitation letter and was asked to apply for a “humanitarian” visa and the process was quite smooth)

looking for the right encryption term: one private to many public

Maybe I don’t know the right terms to find what I’m after. Asymmetric RSA encryption involves one private key and one public key. I’m looking for an approach that involves one private key and many public keys — a one to many relationship. What do you call such a technology?

It would be nice if I could generate additional public keys on the fly, and even nicer if I could generate them based upon some input data. I don’t need my public keys to be able to encrypt data; decryption alone is sufficient (and vice-versa, the private key would only be used for encryption).

Split server into two virtuals, but can’t set cgi-bin alias right

So despite having zero experience with the server side, I split my dedicated Ubuntu 18.04 server into two virtual servers. One for and the other for x.x.x.x

Originally both had access to the same cgi-bin, which I did not want.

So in the x.x.x.x.conf file I added

ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/www/x.x.x.x/public_html/cgi-bin/     <Directory "/var/www/x.x.x.x/public_html/cgi-bin">         AllowOverride None         Options +ExecCGI -MultiViews +SymLinksIfOwnerMatch         Order allow,deny         Allow from all     </Directory> 

Then I restarted apache, but now I can’t reach the cgi-bin folder at all

The access log says:

“GET /cgi-bin/ HTTP/1.1” 500 803 “-“

The error:

[cgid:error] [pid 560:tid 140643013695232] [client x.x.x.x:50568] End of script output before headers:

My uneducated guess makes me think it’s a bad alias. If anyone can help me I would so appreciate it.


Finder Column View “Right Size All Columns Individually” via AppleScript

I’d like to set up a keyboard shortcut to trigger the “Right Size All Columns Individually” command that Finder’s column view has when you right-click on a column divider.

Is it possible to access and trigger that command with an AppleScript? Or perhaps it’s possible to recreate the same functionality with an AppleScript? From there, I’d be able to set up a key command to trigger the script.

I am aware of Finder-enhancers that have auto-column-sizing options built in like TotalFinder and XtraFinder, but both of those have proven to make Finder unstable at times on all versions of macOS that I’ve used. Plus I’d rather not disable System Integrity Protection.

Is it right to add a step for waiting in the BDD feature file?

I’m using BDD and I’m writing Gherkin feature files. Is it good practice to add a step in a Scenario to wait for a while?

Something like:

Waits for 2 seconds after all the operations complete 

or should this be implemented in the code without having an explicit step? A stakeholder would not know about the necessity to wait for a bit before checking for something so in some way, this is not part of the business logic but it is convenient to implement this step to allow to easily enforce that the checks run after a bit.

Consequences of not doing a REST API the “right” way?

I’ll ask this question this way – what are the software engineering concerns for not implementing my REST API the “right” way?

What do you mean the “right” way? Well, allow me to explain my perception of the right way, then I’ll tell you how I am doing it (also, assume I am talking about a JSON REST API).

The right way

  1. Statelessness. This is the part I do get. The client maintains the state always 100% the time forevermore. It’s not the server’s job, it’s the client’s.

  2. The expected actions and response for each verb:

    • GET – Gets a resource specified in full entirety, only limited by either the authorization in the request or a query parameter. This assures no modification of any resource in the process.
    • POST – Given an entire resource description (like a JSON object), creates a resource, then returns that resource, with any server side properties also created, such as dates or IDs.
    • DELETE – Deletes a specified resource, giving only some sort of 200 OK as the response
    • PUT – Given an entire object declaration as input, updates the resource at a specific location, updating all fields of the resource to each of the fields given in the input. To be clear, this expects the entire object to be passed in as input. The entire updated resource is returned, with all fields (according to the authorization or any other input flags).
    • PATCH – Given only the fields wished to be modified for a resource, updates just the fields in a specified resource that are given as input. (This is where I am unclear): The entire resource is returned? (Or is it just the updated fields? Dunno. Don’t care.)
  3. Resource paths. Given the relationship of the resources to each other, a resource path may look like one of:
    • /parentresource/:id
    • /parentresource/:id/childresource
    • /parentresource/:id/childresource/:childId
    • /parentresource/:id/childresource/:childId/subresource/:subresourceId (In this example, a subresource belongs to a childresource, which belongs to a parent resource).

The way I want to do it

The above is my understanding of how a REST API is supposed to work. Now let me list some of my variations to the above:

  1. PUT/PATCH – What is the point of passing in the entire resource for modification? I only use PUTs to modify resources, and I only pass in the fields I want to be updated. As a result, I have no need to use PATCH
  2. Resource Paths – I use GUIDs in my application. As a result, they will be globally unique. Why do I need the full resource path, including the parent resources, if I can just uniquely refer to a subresource by itself? Like:


If I were to do it the “right” way, trying to reference the subresource would require a full path like:


Is all that necessary? Because now I have to have additional error handling if my path contains a :subresourceId that is not actually owned by a given :childId, and ditto for a :childId not owned by a parent :id. My server side is taking care of resource authorization. Can’t I just reference the resource itself, rather than the full path?

  1. The return response. Let’s say, for example, that my data structure is a hierarchical tree, with no practical limits on tree depth. Resources lie at different levels down the tree, in a hierarchical fashion.
    • The GET is obvious. If I get this entire tree, I expect the entire tree as a response, with resources contained within resources.
    • If I POST to create a new resource, PUT to update, or DELETE to remove, I want to see the deltas in the tree, rather than just seeing the resource that I created/updated/deleted. I don’t want to have to again call the GET of the parent tree after every POST, PUT, or DELETE, especially if there are little changes to the tree and I only want to see the deltas.

Hopefully my questions are clear.

If you were to see a REST implementation as I described it, would you gawk at it and tell me of your software engineering concerns? If so, what would they be?

Essay about baseball i don’t want to do my homework right now

Buy 30 page essay i need help writing term paper

Professional and Secure Custom Writing Service


Writing Services – CLICK HERE

Ogden R. Reid, 93, Herald Tribune Editor and Congressman, Dies
Who can write essay on lunar eclipse math homework help multiplication
Bin Salman…

Essay about baseball i don't want to do my homework right now

Distribution of right jumps conditional of hitting time for a random walk with possibility of inaction.

Suppose we have a random walk that moves in discrete time. It starts at zero and in each period it jumps one unit to the right with probability $ \alpha$ , it jumps to the left one unit with probability $ \beta$ , and it does not move with probability $ 1-\alpha-\beta$ . Obviously $ \alpha,\beta>0$ and $ \alpha+\beta<1$ .

Conditional on the stopping time at which the random walk hits 1 being $ k$ periods, what is the distribution of the number of right jumps?