## 2 phone names in the hotspot section

I use a note 10 plus and reset it to factory settings since I was giving it for repairs for screen issue. I have not yet given it for repairs and happened to check my hotspot and it shows samsung galaxy note 10 plus 15 C9? what is this supposed to mean, Is someone using C9 hacking my phone? I am concerned.

## How does the skills section work?

I’m filling out the a pdf character sheet for my character who is a high elf wizard and I’m not sure how the skill box works. I’ve got all my saving throws done but I’m really just confused with the dots down the side.

Which dots do I fill in and how does that change the number beside it?

If this helps my saving throw totals are:

• +1 Strength
• +4 Dexterity
• +1 Constitution
• +6 Intelligence
• +3 Wisdom
• +3 Charisma

## [ Movies ] Open Question : Movies Section: What if Batman & Robin was directed by Tim Burton (Instead of Joel Schumacher)?

If the movie of Batman & Robin (1997) was directed by Tim Burton (Produced, too) instead of Joel Schumacher, what do you think about this cast of characters? Cast: Michael Keaton as Bruce Wayne/Batman (Instead of George Clooney) Marlon Wayans as Dick Grayson/Robin (Instead of Chris O’Donnell) For the villains instead of Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy, and… Bane Nicolas Cage as Dr. Jonathan Crane/Scarecrow Courtney Love as Dr. Harleen Quinn/Harley Queen And as for the last main character as a heroine character… Alicia Silverstone as Barbara Gordon/Batgirl (Not Barbara Wilson) Any thoughts?

## Why does Chrome show 304 in Response Headers section but 200 in Status code?

Might be a silly question, but I haven’t found any clear answer yet. Why does Chrome show 304 in Response Headers section but 200 in Status code? Why doesn’t it show 304 in Status code (BTW, that is NOT 200 memory cache.)?

If it shows 200 I can’t know it is actually 304 without looking into request detail.

Compared to Firefox (the same request), 304 in status code.

## [ Comedy ] Open Question : Comedy Section: In your opinion, which character of Friends do you think is popular?

Out of these list of characters, which Friends do you think is better? 1. Rachel Green (Jennifer Aniston) 2. Monica Geller (Courtney Cox) 3. Phoboe Buffay (Lisa Kudrow) 4. Joey Tribbiani (Matt LeBlanc) 5. Chandler Bing (Matthew Perry) 6. Ross Geller (David Schwimmer)

## Does Dekkers solutions to critical section problem ensure progress?

I was reading concurrency control section from Operating Systems book by William Stallings. In this book, he gives three attempts by Dekker to give solution to critical section problem:

Attempt 1

``+------------------------+------------------------+ | //process 0            | //process 1            | | while (flag[1]);       | while (flag[0]);       | | flag[0] = true;        | flag[1] = true;        | | /* critical section*/; | /* critical section*/; | | flag[0] = false;.      | flag[1] = false;.      | +------------------------+------------------------+ ``

Attempt 2

``+------------------------+------------------------+ | //process 0            | //process 1            | | flag[0] = true;        | flag[1] = true;        | | while (flag[1]);       | while (flag[0]);       | | /* critical section*/; | /* critical section*/; | | flag[0] = false;       | flag[1] = false;       | +------------------------+------------------------+ ``

Attempt 3

``+-----------------------+-----------------------+ | //process 0           | //process 1           | | flag[0] = true;       | flag[1] = true;       | | while (flag[1])       | while (flag[0])       | | {                     | {                     | |    flag[0] = false;   |    flag[1] = false;   | |    /* delay */        |    /* delay */        | |    flag[0] = true;    |    flag[1] = true;    | | }                     | }                     | | /* critical section*/ | /* critical section*/ | | flag[0] = false;      | flag[1] = false;      | +-----------------------+-----------------------+ ``

Which of the above attempts ensure progress requirement of solution to critical section?

Progress requirement is stated as follows in the book by Galvin et al:

If no process is executing in its critical section and some processes wish to enter their critical sections, then only those processes that are not executing in their remainder sections can participate in the decision on which will enter its critical section next, and this selection cannot be postponed indefinitely.

This is what I feel:

1. Remainder section is code executing after critical section. In attempt 1, if process 0 is busy waiting in `while()`, then it will be unblocked by process 1 by setting `flag[1]` to `false`, which is in remainder section. So this attempt does not seem to ensure progress.
2. This attempt can cause deadlock. So, it may indefinitely postpone decision to let process enter its critical section. Hence, it does not ensure progress requirement.
3. This attempt can cause livelock. So, like attempt 2, it may indefinitely postpone decision to let process enter its critical section and hence, it does not ensure progress requirement.

Am I correct with these points?

## How to Delete Code Below the Footer Section

I’m hoping you can give me some advice:

I created a blog post you can see here: https://www.reyrrodriguez.com/seo-services-worth-it/

I added videos by embedding the YouTube player. I realized the page became a lot slower. So I tried to fix it by following this tutorial. https://www.labnol.org/internet/light-youtube-embeds/27941/

I added the script part using google tag manager using custom HTML tag: http://prntscr.com/py9xk7

The problem is, as you can see near the bottom of the page under the footer the code shows: http://prntscr.com/py9zic

I tried to run a system backup using siteground which is my hosting service. But it did not work to revert the change.

Can you give me some tips how I can complete this correctly: https://www.labnol.org/internet/light-youtube-embeds/27941/

And remove the code at the bottom?

I would really appreciate. -Rey

PS: Before completing the system back up I paused the tag within tag manager and also tried to delete it. But the code at the bottom never went away.

## What constitutes a minimal-sum section of an integer array

I’m having trouble understanding what constitutes a “minimal sum section” of an integer array. My book defines it as the following:

Let $$a[0],\dots, a[n-1]$$ be the integer values of an array $$a$$.
A section of $$a$$ is a continuous piece $$a[i],\dots,a[j]$$, where $$0\le i \le j < n$$. We write $$S_i,_j$$ for the sum of that section: $$a[i] + a[i+1]+\dots+a[j]$$.
A minimal-sum section is a section $$a[i],\dots,a[j]$$ of $$a$$ such that the sum $$S_{i,j}$$ is less than or equal to the sum $$S_{i’,j’}$$ of any other section $$a[i’],\dots,a[j’]$$ of $$a$$.

My confusion comes with one of the examples that follow this definition:

The array [1,-1,3,-1,1] has two minimal-sum sections [1,-1] and [-1,1] with minimal sum 0.

But, wouldn’t the minimal sum section be $$[-1]$$ ?

In a later example they give:

array $$[-1,3,-2]$$

Minimal sum

section $$[-2]$$

So, in the last example they definitely counted one element as the minimal sum section, but not in the first one. Any clarification on why this is so would be greatly appreciated.

## Any thought framework to decide between section vs page?

Are there any patterns one should follow to help them decide if a topic should should go as a separate page on a website or should it be a section under an existing page?

e.g: For my SaaS @ https://divshow.bytebeacon.com .. When you login .. I have a bunch of things shoved under the “Accounts” page. There are profile details in there, basic stats and billing. I feel like I should separate out Billing section into a separate page (it seems like a high value page), but I can keep profile info and basic stats together. I can also split “Stats” in its own page, but now I’m starting to feel there might be too many pages (I wanted to keep low number of clicks for the user as well).

How do you think about a topic getting its own page vs being placed as a section in another page? Also what would your advice be on my “Accounts” page?

## how to add SharePoint group to Community activity stream +Add people to this conversation section

I have added community activity stream webpart to page, with in that +Add poeple to this conversation box is available, I am able to add single user, but i need to add sharepoint group. How to add sharepoint group to activity stream webpart +Add people to this conversation box.