Cheap, Reliable, Budget, Secured SSD Hosting – Hostbazzar.com!

If you want to improve the quality of your business and have a heavy site, big blog, high traffic site that needs high resources? Yes then you are in the right place. Hostbazzar understands the importance of fast-loading websites, which is why we designed some cheap and affordable web hosting solutions based on SSD web hosting.SSD hosting plans run on servers that store your data on a solid-state drive.

SSD hard drive is the latest advancement and acquisition of data storage technology, resulting in faster and more reliable hosting for your
website than server with traditional hard disk drive. Our SSD hosting plans start at $ 1 / month and guarantee you 20x Lighting Fast Hosting
with excellent performance.Our plans are cPanel based and come up with the best possible features. You can increase your website loading
speed by 300% faster than those hosted on a hard drive server … Sign up today and take advantage of our offer and give us a chance to serve

SS1 Lightning SSD hosting with high speed and Tier 2 support
Coupon Code:: 50HB

Starting from:
Startup SSD $ 1 / month
Pro SSD $ 2.5 / month
Premium $ SSD 5.5 / month
Elite SSD $ 8.5 / month

For more information, visit us at www.hostbazzar.com

Features include:

X 20x faster speed
~ Unlimited bandwidth
~ Unlimited Email Accounts
~ Limited Unlimited Subdomains
~ Online Free Online Site Builder
~ Unlimited MySQL database
~ Auto Free Auto SSL
~ D DDoS protection
~ Online Free Online Site Builder
~ Free data migration
~ Unlimited FTP Accounts
~ C FREE CPL Control Panel
~ Softcalus supported
~ Back Free Backup Restore
~ Ph Free PhpMyAdmin
~ Up 99.99% uptime

hostbazzar.com – Cheap Web Hosting, Trusted Web Hosting, One Dollar Hosting, Cheap Dedicated Server, Cheap Reseller Hosting, SSD Shared Hosting,
 US VPS Hosting, $ 1 Unlimited Hosting, Linux SSD Hosting, One Dollar Hosting, Affordable Linux Hosting,

Thank you

Loopholes in secured file server

My system to share private data works like this:

I rent a virtual server at a hosting company.

There I have a self-signed certificate installed.

The folder with the files inside is password protected via htaccess file

AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /path/.htpasswd Require valid-user 

passwords are salted in htpasswd.

It is for downloading files I uploaded.

So SSL check, Password check.

You enter the url of the file and are prompted to accept the certificate and enter the password and username. If right, you get the file.

Which loopholes do you see I should fix?

[Hostpoco.com]*Best SSD Linux Reseller Hosting @ $5/month- 100% Secured -24×7 Support

Hostpoco.com provides you all types of web hosting solutions. We offer everything that you need to build, host and manage your website with 24*7 technical support and 99.99% Uptime Guarantee. There are no hidden fees and a 30-day moneyback guarantee. Select the world’s best web hosting service for your website.

Get High Config & Best Featured SSD Linux Reseller Hosting only @ $5/month With Hostpoco. Just Sign up and be online within 2 minutes with our instant & free setup!

Below is the list of SSD Linux Reseller Hosting plan:

*Startup SSD Reseller: @ Just $5/month
~22GB Web Space
~Unlimited Bandwidth
~Free Let’s Encrypt SSL
~10 CPanel Accounts
~Unlimited FTP Accounts

*Pro SSD Reseller: @ Just $8/month
~55GB Web Space
~Unlimited Bandwidth
~Free Let’s Encrypt SSL
~25 CPanel Accounts
~Unlimited FTP Accounts

*Premium SSD Reseller: @ Just $12/month
~75GB Web Space
~Unlimited Bandwidth
~Free Let’s Encrypt SSL
~40 CPanel Accounts
~Unlimited FTP Accounts

*Elite SSD Reseller: @ Just $14 /month
~120GB Web Space
~Unlimited Bandwidth
~Free Let’s Encrypt SSL
~60 CPanel Accounts
~Unlimited FTP Accounts

#Hostpoco.com : Linux Reseller | SSD Linux Reseller | Windows Reseller | WordPress Hosting | VPS Hosting.

For more Plan details:https://hostpoco.com/best-ssd-linux-reseller-web-hosting.php

Thank you.

What is the most secured way to store private key on the client’s machine

I’m building the equivalent of a blockchain wallet, it is an end-to-end encryption desktop program, the user (client) must be the only one to know his private key, with this private key, he can send funds or perform some potentially very critical operations, of course he just sends messages signed with the private key.

The UX allows the user to save his private key, so it can be reused later by the same application.

For obvious reasons, I need to encrypt this private key (64 characters string) some way or another, so any other program or person that has access to the file system cannot read it.

What are the state-of-the-art or recommended practice to adress this critical issue ?

Is there some OS features that allow only one program to read/put some data ?

Thanks

Inovke Secured Web API from remote event receiver

I have a Remote Event Receiver developed/deployed for SharePoint online using hosted-addin. This add-in can be deployed in different sharepoint online enviroments. When item added event gets triggered another list gets updated.

To update the list with data, a WebAPI gets invoked which is secured using OAuth. How i can invoke the WebAPI to get the needed data.

I am able to get the context of sharepoint to manage the list data and access token is also available. Can this token be passed somehow to get the API authericated and how ??

I guess the token available is for sharepoint and not for the webapi.How this can be made working??

Is it possible to verify the requesting user for a REST transaction secured by JWT at a later date?

I have a React (Javascript) single-page application that authenticates users via username/password/MFA to Keycloak, receives a signed JWT upon successful authentication, and then uses that JWT to call stateless/session-less REST services.

With this setup, or with additional “moving parts” to be added to the overall system, is there a way to at a later date to assert that a certain user identity was responsible for a transaction? Assume that we are able to store any/all data that is in-context (i.e., is part of the REST call for the transaction) at the time the transaction is requested.

Thanks to @alnbhclyn for their thoughts below. I think I need to clarify — the key gap above seems to be the link between a JWT and the specific contents of a transaction. Is there a means of “signing” the transaction with the JWT or some part thereof such that a positive link between the two can be made at any point in the future?