*Only $ 1.5 per month – Free Setup – windows Shared Hosting – Unlimited Bandwidth- Fr

Hostpoco.com offer windows Shared Hosting @ only $1.5 per month with 24×7 live chat support. We use only the best quality equipment with built in redundancy features, server reliability is backed up with our 99.9% Uptime Guarantee.

Windows is a solution designed by Microsoft and usually comes with a licensing cost. We also know the fact that most web applications being used today are Windows-based and hence this is most recommended one.

MAIN FEATURES

 Allows to build a dynamic website
 High server also maintain stable on windows server
 Unlimited Email Accounts
 Unlimited Sub Domains
 Unlimited Web Space*
 Unlimited Bandwidth*
 Unlimited Domain Aliases
 Unlimited FTP Accounts
 Unlimited Mailing List
 Email Autoresponders
 E-mail Forwarding
 Zend Optimizer
 Detailed Web Statistics
 Server Side Includes (SSI)
 ODBC Support
 Plesk Control Panel
 PHPMyAdmin
 Frontpage Support
 Server Wide Virus Protection
 99.9% Uptime Guarantee
 Free Setup
 
 More details on https://hostpoco.com/one-dollar-windows-…osting.php
 
windows Shared Hosting Plan:

*Win Startup – $1.5 /Monthly
*Win Pro – $4.99 /Monthly
*Win Premium – $7.99 /Monthly
*Win Elite – $9.99 /Monthly

Hostpoco.com: Shared HDD Hosting | Shared SSD | Shared Windows hosting| WordPress Hosting |Free Hosting.

Thank you.

Cluster or shared collections in logical aggregate groups

We would have date specific trading data for about 10M trades – each day’s data comprising ~1T data in different collections like market,trade,settlements etc.
Since we would not need more than 3 days data at any point of time – intention is to delete all data pertaining to T-3 or more.
There would be 2 possible options:

1.Each trading  day being represented as a separate database  - with the standard set of collections viz marketdata,trade,settlementdata in each database 2.Every collection being appended with the date viz marketdata_10032019,marketdata_10042019 etc  

The first option seems better as:

1. much cleaner in terms of maintenance - just dropping the obsolete databases,rather than scanning collections by name.  2. Dynamic collection names as in second option puts severe restrictions in aggregation possibilities - mongo aggregation does not support dynamic names.  

Would appreciate further views – based on performance,concurrency,scalability,clustering/sharding,maintenance etc

I do not see any question that addresses the used case of trying to cluster/maintain on the basis of a second-level logically aggregated grouping of collections based on date (or any other)

Shared SER Verified List or Proxy Semi-Dedi

hello guys, anybody interested to join my verif list subs or Proxy?
monthly subs only $ 40 for list and $ 25 for proxy, and if you want to join you can just pay $ 20 and I will share list and proxy.

or $ 15 for list or $ 5 for proxy only. I share using dropbox.

if you interested, send me eMail luvamaria759@gmail.com coz I rarely on in this forum. thanks.

Find out if a process is legitimately allowed to use “shared memory segments”

rkhunter is checking for processes using shared memory segments and warns with output like:

Warning: The following suspicious (large) shared memory segments have been found: Process: /usr/bin/python3.7 Size: 4,0MB (configured size allowed: 1,0MB) 

Those warnings can be disabled in the rkhunter config with the option ALLOWIPCPROC=path/to/service but it is not wise to just disable all warnings without checking if the process is not suspicious.

How do I find out if it is normal that a process (like /usr/bin/python3.7) is using large shared memories?

Showing socially shared content to users who are not logged in

Almost all the content on my webapp/site is visible only after the viewer has logged in. But, when a user shares a piece of content with someone (who may or may not be a user of the app), that someone receives a link, and expects that clicking on the link will show them the content.

So I need to balance two needs – 1) the assumption (please confirm if this is valid) that directly showing content on clicking a shared link is better UX and 2) the app itself needs to be behind a login/sign-up wall.

What are some good approaches to go about this?

I should also note that for people who aren’t yet users, the signup process is extremely simple and almost the same as logging in: there are 3 fields – name, email, password, fill them up, touch the button and you are directly signed up and logged in. So no confirmation links, etc.

Showing socially shared content to users who are not logged in

Almost all the content on my webapp/site is visible only after the viewer has logged in. But, when a user shares a piece of content with someone (who may or may not be a user of the app), that someone receives a link, and expects that clicking on the link will show them the content.

So I need to balance two needs – 1) the assumption (please confirm if this is valid) that directly showing content on clicking a shared link is better UX and 2) the app itself needs to be behind a login/sign-up wall.

What are some good approaches to go about this?

I should also note that for people who aren’t yet users, the signup process is extremely simple and almost the same as logging in: there are 3 fields – name, email, password, fill them up, touch the button and you are directly signed up and logged in. So no confirmation links, etc.

*Halloween Special*50% OFF on Shared hosting-[Hostpoco.com]

This Halloween Season, Hostpoco is thrilled to announce 50% Discount on Shared hosting.

If you are a new web-user looking to start your own blog, hobby website or even Web developer/ Designer willing to start your own Web hosting Business at low cost and investment then this one-time opportunity to get your started online is just perfect for you… Its highly advised not to miss this offer. Also our Halloween code for this year is very special because it works on all our services.

50% Off With Linux Shared SSD hosting yearly using code:HP50

Features Offered With Hostpoco :

Instant Account Set-up
Free Data Transfer / Migration
FREE SSL (Letsencrypt SSL)
FREE CloudLinux / Litespeed / CloudFlare
Free Website Builder for WHM/Cpanel
Softaculous integrated with Cpanel
Free Attracta SEO Tools integrated with cPanel
Free Dedicated IPs (On E-commerce, VPS, Dedicated Servers & Selected Reseller Plans)
Free Enom Reseller account (Reseller Plans)
Free SSL Certificate (On E-commerce and Selected Reseller Plans)
Private Nameservers
Price-Freeze
99.9% Uptime Guarantee
No Contracts
30 Day Money-Back Guarantee (Applicable for Shared hosting and Reseller Hosting)

For more details:https://www.hostpoco.com/deals/

Thank you.

[Hostpoco.com]-Affordable Windows Shared Hosting @ only $1.5 per month.

Hostpoco.com is a professional web hosting company which aims to provide the best quality web hosting experience for our customers.
Now Hostpoco come with new Windows Shared Hosting plan @ only $1.5 per month along with many features like 
-Allows to build a dynamic website
-High server also maintain stable on windows server
-Unlimited Email Accounts
-Unlimited Web Space
-Unlimited Bandwidth
-Unlimited Sub Domains.

Windows is a solution designed by Microsoft, and usually comes with a licensing cost. We also know the fact that most web applications being used today are Windows-based and hence this is most recommended one.

Windows Shared Hosting Startup plan @ $1.5 per month:
~Single Domain Hosting
~1 MySQL Database
~1 MsSQL Databases(2005 / 2008)
~200MB MySQL/Ms Database Size
~Ms SQL Web Admin: My Little Admin
~ASP.NET 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.0 & 1.1
~PHP 4.4.7 & PHP 5.2.13
~Unlimited Domain Aliases
~Unlimited FTP Accounts
~Unlimited Mailing List
~Email Autoresponders
~E-mail Forwarding
~Zend Optimizer
~Detailed Web Statistics
~ASP
~Fastcgi
~Python
~Server Side Includes (SSI)
~ODBC Support
~Plesk Control Panel
~Frontpage Support
~Server Wide Virus Protection
~99.9% Uptime Guarantee
~Free Setup

For more details and plan:https://hostpoco.com/one-dollar-windows-…osting.php

Thank you.