Ubuntu 18 LTS , Stuck on “Updates and other software” during installation

I am using Asus A541uj with Nvidia 920mx. Got stuckenter image description here every time on “Updates and other software” during installation. I created a bootable USB with Rufus & Universal USB Installer. Tried both GPT/MBR , DD/ISO , BIOS/UEFI, UEFI/Non CMS in Rufus. Tried BIOS Settings Fastboot off/On , CMS On/Off (No other option is given in my bios )

Now i am tired Please help me.

Can rootkits hide their internet usage from resource-manager and third party software in windows 10? if so, how?

So lets say I have the latest windows 10 version, i also have DU meter for checking my network usage

now i know that in windows there is a linked list of processes that many rootkits tend to remove themselves from it to hide from task manager, but im not sure if this is still possible in windows 10 or even if it is possible, will it make third party software not show the internet usage or not

so i have two questions:

  1. what are the methods that can be used to remove the internet usage from third party software and resource manager to show up in windows 10? if a detail explanation is possible it would be really helpful

  2. is there anyway i can be sure that when there is no upload showing in my DU meter and resource manager then it means there is actually no upload happening?

Which Visa or pass required for attending software workshop in Singapore?

I am joining an entrepreneurship program in SG and traveling on 10th July. I applied for EntrePass Visa on 12 june but i think it’ll still take some time to get IPA letter so i can’t enter in SG as of now.
What is my best bet to enter in Singapore till I get EntrePass Visa? A work pass/tourist visa?

I’m from India.

Over 100,000 PLR Article Pack for Every Possible Niches & 5 plr software for $5

More-Than 100,000 PLR Article Pack for Every Possible Niches Now Just for $ 5, Why pay more, when you get this for just $ 5. Grab the deal Now! >> Let me show you one of 100,000+ article PLR stands for Private Label Rights. PLR articles are a relatively new twist on content building. Private label rights are a special type of right or license which you purchase where you are legally allowed to edit and publish the article as your own. You may even include your own name as the author and your own resource box at the end of each article and sell them. PLR articles are a relatively inexpensive way to produce content for a blog. Any blogger who has been at this for a while knows that keeping a steady flow of content is not an easy thing to do. PLR articles can help to keep that flow going when you run into a period of writer’s block. For Just $ 5 You’ll Receive Instantly; Over 100,000 PLR ArticlesGiveawaysFull Resell Rights The Rights In this Gig; Resell Rights – RRMaster Resale Rights – MRRPrivate Label Rights – PLR Benefits Of Using PLR Products: PLR content is used to create a sales funnel that your customers can travel through. Spin the PLR articles and then use them in your website or blogsAs back-linking Modify, resell, unpack/repackAs a GIVEAWAY/BONUS Products from this package ( PLR , RR ) are; PLR ArticleGet 5 plr software free of cost as a bonus. Some of the Niche covered;Health and FitnessInternet MarketingFinancesAffiliate MarketingSEOSelf-HelpWeight LossTravelBusinessMaking Money& many many more Topics are arranged categorically, so you’ll be able to easily find what you need. Note: All articles are gathers from the internet. If you use this same article on your website, and if you get a Thin content error from google, Therefore, I am not responsible for any damage. No doubt its highly recommended that, you should rewrite or modify the PLR articles before use . They are not Copyscape pass and are already published on various websites. On the other hand, you may find some Copyscape pass articles, if you are lucky. But you can modify and reuse or sell it even commercially. For anything further information contact me. No REFUND policy for this service due to instant download.

by: raman620
Created: —
Category: Content & Writing
Viewed: 238

Unique Car Software Niche Site – Adsense – Revenue $25 BIN

Why are you selling this site?
Having a clear out of sites, this is a unique site linking to a well known (by word of mouth) bit of freeware. However the software does not have its own site, So i created the site which links to it.. It is maturing well to be picked up on search terms when people look the software up.

Its a fairly simple, easy to use and clean template running wordpress which some clever link adverts – they have made some revenue but nothing to shout about YET – but…

Unique Car Software Niche Site – Adsense – Revenue $ 25 BIN

Building software for the Hackrf

I want to start using SDR radio devices for pentesting. I was doing some research and came across a device called the Hackrf. The problem with this device was that it required the use of GNU radio and there is not a python library available for the Hackrf. So my questions are, how would I go about building my own version of GNU radio, is it possible for python to interface with the Hackrf, and where can I learn more about the concepts behind the Hackrf? As a side note, I am using Kali Linux as my operating system.

UnicodeDecodeError error when starting Software Properties GTK Ubuntu 18.04

There is an issue when I try to launch software-properties-gtk on Ubuntu 18.04. Nothing happens when launching via desktop icon, and via terminal this error comes out:

root:~# software-properties-gtk  Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/usr/bin/software-properties-gtk", line 100, in <module>     app = SoftwarePropertiesGtk(datadir=options.data_dir, options=options, file=file)   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/gtk/SoftwarePropertiesGtk.py", line 189, in __init__     self.show_keys()   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/gtk/SoftwarePropertiesGtk.py", line 886, in show_keys     for key in self.apt_key.list():   File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/AptAuth.py", line 64, in list     for line in p:   File "/usr/lib/python3.6/codecs.py", line 321, in decode     (result, consumed) = self._buffer_decode(data, self.errors, final) UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe9 in position 6808: invalid continuation byte 

It looks like a file contains a non-UTF8 character, but I am unable to know which one. /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory is empty, and /etc/apt/sources.list contains:

# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic main restricted # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial main restricted  ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic-updates main restricted # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates main restricted  ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security ## team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic universe # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic-updates universe # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates universe  ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic multiverse # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic-updates multiverse # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-updates multiverse  ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic-backports main restricted universe multiverse # deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ xenial-backports main restricted universe multiverse  ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu bionic partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial partner  deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security main restricted # deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security universe # deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security multiverse # deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security multiverse*  deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu bionic-cran35/ 

Prove (disprove) that a document was created with a specific software build

I’m creating some software that essentially enforces a specific process for creating specific documents. Afterwards, the file is signed with the user’s key (USB token not related to the software). Recently there came a stakeholder suggestion to also sign it with the software’s key to prove the process was followed.

But anyone could pull the key from the software and sign anything with it. So how could I include something in the file that confirms (or allows to disprove that) it was created with an authorized build of the software?

Doesn’t matter if the copy is legit or not, just that it’s not been modified.

I’ve narrowed down the threat model to two cases:

  • A. Someone (average solo developer) alters the software, or creates a replacement, to save time, then blames us when things go wrong. I need a way to show “It wasn’t our build”.
  • B. A lawyer claims the document is meaningless because anyone could have done A. The good guys need to show it’s not trivial and there were some protections against that.

The software needs to work mostly offline, so online authentication on every signature is not acceptable. The project’s far too small for anything with the monstrousness of Denuvo. But I still feel there’s got to be a simple solution that I’m too blind to see.

I have considered using the user’s token to encrypt/decrypt the signing certificate, but it has to be supplied to a proper build, and can’t be too cumbersome (we already have a problem with a longer process than desirable). Thought a bit of what code signing could do, but it doesn’t seem to do anything for this case. What am I missing?