Squeeze with difference

Given is a positive integer integer $ n$ , and integers $ a_1,b_1,\dots,a_n,b_n$ with $ a_i\leq b_i$ for each $ i$ . What is the complexity of deciding whether there exist integers $ c_1,\dots,c_n$ such that $ a_i\leq c_i\leq b_i$ for all $ i$ and $ |c_i-c_j|\geq 2$ for all $ i,j$ ?

What can be observed is that a greedy algorithm, wherein we assume that $ a_1\leq\dots\leq a_n$ and choose $ c_i$ according to this order, does not necessarily work. For example, we may have $ a_1=1, b_1=4, a_2=b_2=2$ . Putting $ c_1=1$ does not work (it leaves no room for $ c_2$ ), but what works is putting $ c_1=4$ and $ c_2=2$ . Is the problem perhaps NP-hard?

Design Responsive WordPress Landing Page Or Squeeze Page for $10

Hello !! Myself Rifat. Thanks for visiting my GIG services. Here I am offering you High-End WEB services. In my GIG service, the main objective is client 100% satisfaction. Why you hire me?I’m an experienced WordPress expert.Performance and quality based work is my first priority.Client satisfaction is my main objective.More than 100+ website build working experience.Time on delivery.24/7 customer support.100% money back guaranty. My special GIG services and features for youCreate stunning WordPress website for youCreate WordPress website site with own UI/UX design concept.Increase your WordPress website performance and security.Fix any kinds of Error/Bug/Issues of WordPress.Theme installation and properly configure.100% responsive to all kinds of Create stunning WordPress Feel free to contact me. Order me with confidence, Send me the message before ordering. Thank you,Mohai menur RifatCertified UI/UX designer and WordPress expert

by: MMRifat
Created: —
Category: WordPress
Viewed: 313

Squeeze theorem of multivariable functions

My Question is the following: Let F: U $ \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ $ \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^m$ where U is an open set containing a punctured neighbourhood of a. Let G : $ U \subset \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}$ . Assume $ 0 \leq |f(x)| \leq h(x)$ ( Note, here |.| denotes the magnitude of the vector. Show that if limit of h(x) as x approaches a is 0 then the limit of f(x) as x approaches a is 0. Note that I get the general idea; however, what i’m stuck on is showing that
|f(x)|$ \leq$ h(x)$ \leq$ $ |h(x)|$ . I’m not sure why that follows and what it means because h(x) is a vector, and the absolute value is the length of the vector..

[GET] Squeeze Ninja

Sales Page


Direct Download



http://vimeopro.com/memberspeed/squeezeninjatraining  http://squeezeninja.com/TRAIN

Sorry Don't have the OTO's

Make mirror if you can


Can a creature choose to squeeze into a space when not forced to do so?

In Pathfinder (not 2, and other systems for comparison would be interesting for comparison but are not the question)…

Assuming you are large or larger, and expect a square you occupy to later be attacked, can you squeeze of your own choice?

For example, a huge or larger creature backed up against a cliff who expects to be targeted by arrows, can they ‘press themselves to the wall’ squeezing into the space nearest the wall, otherwise following all squeeze rules?

Or similarly knowing that a square is trapped in a hallway can you squeeze to walk past without setting it off?

Design Landign page or Squeeze page or sale page for $10

Hi, Over 4 years, i have developed many websites using WordPress,HTML5,CSS3,PHP,Joomla.in this journey i have developed sites for small companies,small businesses,startup and many others Works Description : *Standard+responsive features *Upload all files on your server *100% money back service *source file *1 page/Screen included *Need hosting control panel login *Responsive design and develop *Landing page very unique *Fix plugin problems thanks sir

by: fanszone
Created: —
Category: WordPress
Viewed: 186

How to properly squeeze an object when is being pressed between two others based on percentage of scale?

Am trying to do this: How can I "squeeze" a game object when it is pressed between two others?

Which has anwsers, but with some issues, like not lerping back to original scale or not resizing properly based on percentage of collisions (what am struggling with). So this is how I´ve solved it until now:

private Vector3 originalScale; private float currentX; private float currentZ; private float area; public float minValue = 0.6f; //1 is perfect horizontal/vertical MeshFilter filter;  public float skinWidth = 0.1f; public float firstLenght = 0.2f; //must be grater than skniWidth;  RaycastHit hit;  GameObject leftEmpty; GameObject rightEmpty;  bool pressedLeft = false; bool pressedRight = false;  float diffX; float originalDiffX;  bool orig = false;  void Awake() {     filter = this.GetComponent<MeshFilter>(); }  void Start() {     originalScale = new Vector3(filter.mesh.bounds.size.x, filter.mesh.bounds.size.y, filter.mesh.bounds.size.z);     area = originalScale.x * originalScale.z;     leftEmpty = new GameObject();     rightEmpty = new GameObject(); }  void OnCollisionStay(Collision coll) {     if (coll.gameObject.tag != "Ground" && coll.gameObject.tag != "Ceiling")     {         //if the collision is from the left side         for (int i = 0; i < coll.contacts.Length; i++)         {             if (coll.contacts[i].normal.x > minValue) //am checking direction based on normals, not positions              {                 Vector3 rayOrigin = coll.contacts[i].point + Vector3.right * skinWidth;                 if (pressedLeft == false)                 {                     if (Physics.Raycast(rayOrigin, -Vector3.right, out hit, firstLenght))                     {                         Debug.DrawRay(rayOrigin, -Vector3.right * firstLenght, Color.blue, 0.1f);                         //Am doing all of this to take the contact points only when they are right (before colliding they are wrong). So the contact point is in the right place only if...                         if (hit.distance <= skinWidth + 0.00008f) // last number is to compensate for weird physics, just ignore it                         {                             leftEmpty.transform.position = hit.point;                             pressedLeft = true;//so the leftEmpty´s position is set only once, then is moved via parenting below                         }                     }                 }                  leftEmpty.transform.SetParent(coll.transform);//am parenting them so I can keep them after OnCollisionExit because I´ll use this numbers also to lerp back to original scale             }         }         //if the collision is from the right side         for (int i = 0; i < coll.contacts.Length; i++)         {             if (coll.contacts[i].normal.x < -(minValue))             {                 Vector3 rayOrigin = coll.contacts[i].point - Vector3.right * skinWidth;                 if (pressedRight == false)                 {                     if (Physics.Raycast(rayOrigin, Vector3.right, out hit, firstLenght))                     {                         if (hit.distance <= skinWidth + 0.00008f)                          {                             rightEmpty.transform.position = hit.point;                             pressedRight = true;                         }                     }                 }                  rightEmpty.transform.SetParent(coll.transform);             }         }     }       if (pressedLeft == true && pressedRight == true && orig == false)     {         originalDiffX = Mathf.Abs(rightEmpty.transform.position.x - leftEmpty.transform.position.x);         orig = true;     } }  void Update() {     diffX = Mathf.Abs(rightEmpty.transform.position.x - leftEmpty.transform.position.x);     //originally, I was doing this:     currentX = diffX;     currentZ = area / currentX;     if (leftEmpty.transform.position.x != 0 && rightEmpty.transform.position.x != 0)     {         if (currentX <= originalScale.x)         {             transform.localScale = new Vector3(currentX / filter.mesh.bounds.size.x, transform.localScale.y, currentZ / filter.mesh.bounds.size.z);         }     }      //And it worked, but only if the collisions were always on the most separate points of the mesh (because the x scale was always the distance between collisions)      //That´s why I wanted percentage, to scale based on the hit points and not the complete width, so I did this:     currentX = originalScale.x / (originalDiffX / diffX); // or (originalScale.x / originalDiffX) * diffX; anything works.     //However, while it solves the percentage issue, it only does it if the collisions stay at the original collision points, which won´t be the case.     //then I tried this to get the originalDiffX equivalent of the updated diffX:     Vector3 closestLeft = this.GetComponent<Collider>().ClosestPoint(leftEmpty.transform.position);     Vector3 closestRight = this.GetComponent<Collider>().ClosestPoint(rightEmpty.transform.position);      float distX = Mathf.Abs(closestRight.x - closestLeft.x);     float mult = (originalDiffX / diffX) * distX;      currentX = originalScale.x / (mult / diffX); //the same formula but replacing the originalDiffX by "mult". I didn´t work at all. The object started to vibrate weirdly.   } 

And I want to improve this: currentX = originalScale.x / (originalDiffX / diffX); enter image description here

As you can see, it goes through; but it doesn´t if the collisions stay at the original collision points: enter image description here

enter image description here

This is easier to explain with an example. Let´s say (originalScale.x / originalDiffX) * diffX = (12/6) * 3 = 6; 6 is the original diff value, which is half the original x scale. That means that the double of the updated diff (in this case 3) will always be the number I want, the number that will become the X scale. But it will be that only if the collisions always follow the original contacts in the mesh (the numbers that gave me 6). So this operation will only be correct if the collisions stay at those corresponding points; But because the object itself is being squeezed, or moving differently to colliders, the colliders start touching different places. As seen in the screenshots, they started colliding on the lowest part, but later they were above there.