Two weeks after transfer, domains still has no nameservers

I recently transferred two of my domains from Google Domains to Njalla. I was sent auth codes for both of them and I entered them in the Njalla dashboard within five minutes, and I thought everything was fine. Within an hour, they showed up in Njalla as "transfer completed", but they still used the Google Domains nameservers. About a day after that, DNS lookups on the domains showed that they have no nameservers at all, and they have stayed that way since. This was 13 days ago. Njalla support also says that the transfers are complete, but they don’t know when the DNS will update. Is the DNS update time supposed to lag behind the domain transfer time by this much?

Just delete 50.000.000 of rows on a PostgreSQL table and DB still very slow

sorry for my poor english.

I have a postgres DB runing on amazon RDS (db.t3.small), with django as a backend. i have made a mistake and created 50.000.000 rows. when i figure out (because queries on that table where ultra slow) i delete it all. but the queries i make on that table stills super slow. it only have 300 rows now.

i have to clean some cache? i have to wait something? the configuration of the RDS in aws is default.

the engine version of postgres is 12.5, also have postgis installed in it.

i check for vacuum issues and run this command:

SELECT relname AS TableName,n_live_tup AS LiveTuples,n_dead_tup AS DeadTuples,last_autovacuum AS Autovacuum,last_autoanalyze AS Autoanalyze FROM pg_stat_user_tables; 

the table with the problem says:

'appointment_timeslot', 1417, 0, datetime.datetime(2021, 7, 21, 18, 13, 8, 193967, tzinfo=<UTC>), datetime.datetime(2021, 7, 21, 18, 13, 30, 551750, tzinfo=<UTC>) 

check for indexes that Django creates automaticly on that table and i find 4

[ ('appointment_timeslot_pkey', 'CREATE UNIQUE INDEX appointment_timeslot_pkey ON public.appointment_timeslot USING btree (id)') 'appointment_timeslot_home_visit_id_62df4faf', 'CREATE INDEX appointment_timeslot_home_visit_id_62df4faf ON public.appointment_timeslot USING btree (home_visit_id)') ('appointment_timeslot_office_id_6871b47b', 'CREATE INDEX appointment_timeslot_office_id_6871b47b ON public.appointment_timeslot USING btree (office_id)') ('appointment_timeslot_time_range_id_715578fa', 'CREATE INDEX appointment_timeslot_time_range_id_715578fa ON public.appointment_timeslot USING btree (time_range_id)') ] 

Still can’t create an AAG listener

I just built a test cluster with 2 MS SQL Server 2014 machines, 1 domain controller, an 1 file share witness. (All of them are Windows2016-based.) The 2 MS SQL Server machines are a WSFC members.

When I created the Always On Availability Group, all steps succeeded except creating a listener.

If I try to repeat adding a listener to this AAG, I receive a message:

Cluster network name resource ‘myaag_mylistener’ failed to create its associated computer object in domain ‘mydomain.lan’ during: Resource online.

The text for the associated error code is: Access is denied.

Please work with your domain administrator to ensure that:

  • The cluster identity ‘MYWSFC$ ‘ has Create Computer Objects permissions. By default all computer objects are created in the same container as the cluster identity ‘MYWSFC$ ‘.
  • The quota for computer objects has not been reached.
  • If there is an existing computer object, verify the Cluster Identity ‘MYWSFC$ ‘ has ‘Full Control’ permission to that computer object using the Active Directory Users and Computers tool.

What I tried:

  1. Create a computer object: mydomain.lan/Computers/mylistener and give the mydomain\MYWSFC$ "Full control" on it;
  2. Remove the object mydomain.lan/Computers/mylistener and grant the mydomain\MYWSFC$ account permissions to create computer objects within mydomain.lan/Computers (List contents, Read all properties, Read permissions, Create computer objects);
  3. In ADSI Edit, DC=mydomain,DC=lan: ms-DS-MachineAccountQuota raised from 10 to 15 (although there are only 5 machine accounts including mylistener$ ).

What could still be wrong?

How do I stop gyroscope-controlled camera from jittering when holding phone still?

I have here a simplified version of my gyro-controlled camera with a sensitivity modification (a side effect of increasing sensitivity is that the jitteriness is exacerbated).

public class GyroControl : MonoBehaviour{  private Transform _rawGyroRotation; Vector3 gyroAdjust; [SerializeField] private float _smoothing = 0.1f;  void Start() {     Input.gyro.enabled = true;     Application.targetFrameRate = 60;      _rawGyroRotation = new GameObject("GyroRaw").transform;     _rawGyroRotation.position = transform.position;     _rawGyroRotation.rotation = transform.rotation;  }  private void Update() {     _rawGyroRotation.rotation = Input.gyro.attitude;      gyroAdjust = _rawGyroRotation.rotation.eulerAngles * 2; //increase rotation sensitivity     transform.rotation = Quaternion.Euler(gyroAdjust);      transform.rotation = Quaternion.Slerp(transform.rotation, _rawGyroRotation.rotation, _smoothing);  }} 

When in motion, the jittering isn’t noticeable. But when you hold the phone still, there’s what I assume to be just analogue noise that causes jittering. I would really appreciate any help or advice on how to add a filter or something to reduce the jittering for this kind of controller.

Thanks.

How to upscale the death house and still keep it fun?

Due to Reasons™, my intro level to my current run of Curse of Strahd for a new group didn’t involve the Death House, I wrote my own intro-level this time.

I always had a lot of fun running it for other groups, though, so wanted to keep it in the game for a later stage. I’ve already written it in the world in a place that’s pretty likely to be found by the players.

The issue is that I still want to keep it a Death House, which it clearly is at levels 1-3, but I expect the party to find it at the earliest by level 5, probably 6. While it still would not be a breeze, I ran a number of the encounters with likely upscales of their current party and it did not feel deadly at all. I could just up all DCs and make each monster group a bit larger, but I don’t feel like that’s particularly interesting.

Assume my Plan™ survives first contact with the players and they find the House. What is an interesting way to upscale the Death House to party level 5-6? The party will be either 4 or 5 characters, depending on who can make which session, and the group is paranoid enough about dying that they seem to insist on running at least 2 healers at all times.

Will a target being apatic after broken haste still remain apatic after beeing downed? [closed]

We had a strange situation in a fight,

and I really side with my DM here who denied it, but the question still remains:

  1. a character is hasted
  2. the concentration breaks, character is in an lethargic state
  3. character gets knocked down before his next turn
  4. the target is no longer a willing creature (?), also it’s status alignments should end when knocked unconscious
  5. the character receives healing and gets back up on his feet -> will he still be lethargic?

I should note that we assume a character would not remain unconscious even after beeing healed / stabilized for simplicity reasons. ( I heard some groups play it this way, unsure about the correct rulings here )

Content-Security-Policy Headers are there and showing the correct settings, but still getting a refused connection

So I’m putting a plugin together that will allow me to connect multiple client sites with an online service.

I can get the service vendors snippet to load, but once you interact with it, that’s where things get tricky and it refuses to load an (I guess) iframe… …it’s pretty poorly documented.

Refused to load https://www.service-domain.com/ because it does not appear in the frame-ancestors directive of the Content Security Policy.

That’s the console log error I was receiving.

So I jumped back into my plugin and added the following:

function bbti_send_headers() {     header( "Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors https://www.service-domain.com/; frame-src https://www.service-domain.com/;" ); } add_action( 'send_headers', 'bbti_send_headers' ); 

Now, when I reload the page I’m still getting the same error Refused to load https://www.service-domain.com/... etc...

However, if I look at the network panel and check the page’s headers this is what I get:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Encoding: gzip Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors https://www.service-domain.com/; frame-src https://www.service-domain.com/; 

So the header is there but still getting the same error from the script.

Anyone know what it is I missed?