menu for custom type and taxonomy at the same time or filter by type

I have two custom types (eg: Cooks and Restaurants) and both have a shared taxonomy (eg: specialty). I want a menu that pulls all the restaurants based on a specific specialty but there doesn’t appear to be a way to use appearance -> menu to add the specialty taxonomy so that it only links to restaurants but not to cooks. eg: a menu that basically does a search for one type with that taxonomy match but doesn’t also pull the other type with that taxonomy match

To be clear I can get the taxonomy with both by simply editing a menu, placing a check-mark in the taxonomy name in screen options and then adding the individual taxonomy terms… I just don’t see how to filter the results to be only a single type. I assume that I will need to do this with some code but wanted to be sure I wasn’t over-engineering it.

Is there a way that is built into WordPress that would allow this to be done or am I looking at writing some custom code/adding a plugin? Alternately… what keywords should I have used to find an answer to this? It seems like anything that is remotely related is dealing with using a taxonomy with the same name as a type. I also looked at the title (at a minimum) of all the advanced-taxonomy-queries tagged questions when I discovered that but none seemed to be like my issue (though many were interesting in other ways).

Does Wild Companion ignore the 1 hour cast time of Find Familiar?

Druid Optional class feature in Tasha’s Cauldron of Everything, Wild Companion, states:

You gain the ability to summon a spirit that assumes an animal form: as an action, you can expend a use of your Wild Shape feature to cast the find familiar spell, without material components.
When you cast the spell in this way, the familiar is a fey instead of a beast, and the familiar disappears after a number of hours equal to half your druid level.

Find Familiar states:

Casting Time: 1 hour
Range: 10 feet
Components: V S M (10 gp worth of charcoal, incense, and herbs that must be consumed by fire in a brass brazier)

Does this mean that a level 2 Druid has to spend 1 hour to get a Familiar for 1 hour? Does this mean that the Druid can cast a Familiar much faster than a Warlock can?

Can I have two castings of minor illusion active at the same time?

I had made a new half-elf sorcerer who will soon be a rogue multi-class. His spells are based off of what a rogue would choose them to be, such as fog cloud, mage hand, and minor illusion. In addition, I chose prestidigitation in the hopes of combining with minor illusion, using one for sound and one for an image.

Yet it was never clear to me if I could just use minor illusion twice, as it is a cantrip. This will free up a cantrip spot for a more offensive spell, seeing as all of my other spells are more ability than offense. We are playing D&D 5E.

Can I have two castings of minor illusion active at the same time?

Reduce Count(*) time in Postgres for Many Records


EXPLAIN ANALYZE select count(*) from product; 

ROWS: 534965


Finalize Aggregate  (cost=53840.85..53840.86 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=5014.774..5014.774 rows=1 loops=1)   ->  Gather  (cost=53840.64..53840.85 rows=2 width=8) (actual time=5011.623..5015.480 rows=3 loops=1)         Workers Planned: 2         Workers Launched: 2         ->  Partial Aggregate  (cost=52840.64..52840.65 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=4951.366..4951.367 rows=1 loops=3)               ->  Parallel Seq Scan on product prod  (cost=0.00..52296.71 rows=217571 width=0) (actual time=0.511..4906.569 rows=178088 loops=3) Planning Time: 34.814 ms Execution Time: 5015.580 ms 

How can we optimize the above query to get the counts very quickly?

This is a simple query, however, its variations can include different conditions and join with other tables.

Time to Go to the Farmers Market China email list

We know since Fresh is better. China email list The term Fresh applies to everything developed. Produce dispatched the nation over isn’t new. The Agricultural Business framework contends the new meaning of produce as a methods for ensuring a huge number of American dollars$ in┬áChina email list question in the United States Grocery Business. There are guidelines determining meanings of new and different terms utilized in cultivating and for selling in supermarkets. Be that as it may, numerous pundits compose and verbally censure guidelines in China email list general. As an entrepreneur, I get this. In any case, the analysis is significant as this spans our immersed media streams changing popular assessment quickly. Produce dispatched from areas all through North America China email list can’t be new by any definition.

American Farmers contend China email list with ranchers all through the world legitimately. Ships, Trucks and Trains carries these items to “center man’ or stockrooms around the nation. The items are dealt with and put away by different individuals from a couple of days to half a month. China email list Produce is constantly picked or reaped prior to aging. This lessens the food ruining in transport and on store racks. There are signs in China email list numerous stores expressing: “Privately Grown.” There are no guidelines to control what precisely than implies. Enormous food merchants must be China email list joking with signs this way however post these consistently.
[Image: China-email-lists-1024x422.png]
Ranchers Markets are in bounty in China email list numerous networks. I prescribe utilizing this site to discover one closer to you. I wish the Farmers Markets near me stayed open past October. Living in the Chicago zone nullifies this as a chance. I bought two Oranges today from a China email list neighborhood merchant. I was stunned to see they originated from South Africa. They are not ready all things considered. I fear the idea of how green or China email list white the oranges were when gathered. This causes an absence of supplements in all produce. I will never know the amount Vitamin C I lost purchasing an Orange from South Africa. Ranchers Markets don’t sell Oranges in the China email list Chicago territory. I actually sought after a California or Florida item.

Gathering Intel – Strategies on balancing social time for different types of players?

I am both a DM and player for our group in two separate campaigns. Some of us are brand new and some are semi-moderately experienced.

I have a noticed a pattern in both games where some players, (about 2 or 3 out of 5), really enjoy the socialization of talking up npc’s and persuading and getting the most of whatever dialogue they can get going. The others seem bored during that portion of role play. I think there are two factors; 1 – their character is someone with terrible social skills and they may feel like trying to engage is sub-optimal or not a good idea, 2 – they want to get to aspects of the game they find more interesting for them.

So when I am GM I want to try to balance between the two and when I am a player (playing a barbarian) I try to stay engaged and input my low intelligence/high ego and let people see that I don’t get punished for opening my mouth.

So I am trying to come up with a balance between the two, which leads to my question: What are common strategies GMs use to balance socialization time for these players with different priorities?

I will mention that the campaign I am GM’ing for is in its early stages, so I am currently facing the setup of the main campaign hub for early-mid game and looking at all these different threads and NPCs the characters have to meet, and knowing that their tendency is to do the online MMO thing of optimizing quest gathering by sweeping through town and collecting all the quests before deciding which are worth pursuing and whether they can complete several at once… which would be one heck of a giant information dump and socialization session.

How does an FPS like Overwatch have client time run ahead of the server?

In watching the GDC talk about Overwatch netcode, it mentions that the client is always ahead of the server, that the "current tick" on the server is behind that of the client.

From their explanation this makes sense. If the client is ahead of the server, then by the time the client messages arrive at the server, the server will have caught up and can handle them when it wants them.

But how does this get setup to begin with? The client connects to the server, the server starts a game… does the client jump ahead of it’s own accord? (Server says "game is starting, I’m at tick 0", and the client is like "okay, well, based on my ping I’m going to be tick 20 then")

  • If the server is in charge of what’s going on in the game, how does the client even know what’s going on in that future tick? I would assume constant extrapolation of game events from the last server update would be bad. Having the client in the past to allow it to interpolate between server updates would make a lot more sense to me.

  • Or am I wrong in assuming that client and server tick times need to remain in sync, and it is instead more loosely based on server updates and the number of client events that happened since that update was received, rather than the client actually caring about what tick they’re on compared to the server?

It’s the time/tick synchronization, despite one or the other having to be in the past, that I can’t wrap my head around…

Why Mathematica is not producing output and taking too much time

I’m trying to solve the given system of ODES but the Mathematica is taking too much time and not producing any output. I was trying to check the error by evaluating one one command but there was no error in any command but the equations EOM2, and EOM3 was taking too much time when I was trying to evaluate the equations.

For simple case aa=0, code works, but when I take non-zero aa, it takes a long time and didn’t produce output.

Can anyone please guide me how can I fix this problem? Is there any command in Mathematica that can be used to obtain the fast output?

 R2[r_, \[Theta]_] := r^2 + aa^2 Cos[\[Theta]]^2;  TR[r_, \[Theta]_] := r^2 - 2 M r + aa^2;   gtt[r_, \[Theta]_] := -(1 - (2 M r)/R2[r, \[Theta]]);  gt\[Phi][r_, \[Theta]_] := -(( 2 r M aa Sin[\[Theta]]^2)/    R2[r, \[Theta]]); g\[Phi]\[Phi][   r_, \[Theta]_] := (r^2 +      aa^2 + (2  M r (aa^2) )/       R2[r, \[Theta]] Sin[\[Theta]]^2) Sin[\[Theta]]^2;  grr[r_, \[Theta]_] := R2[r, \[Theta]]/TR[r, \[Theta]];  g\[Theta]\[Theta][r_, \[Theta]_] := R2[r, \[Theta]];   gUtt[r_, \[Theta]_] := -(1/    TR[r, \[Theta]]) (r^2 +      aa^2 + (2  M r (aa^2) )/ R2[r, \[Theta]] Sin[\[Theta]]^2);  gUt\[Phi][r_, \[Theta]_] := -((2 M aa r)/(   TR[r, \[Theta]] R2[r, \[Theta]]));  gU\[Phi]\[Phi][r_, \[Theta]_] := (  TR[r, \[Theta]] - aa^2 Sin[\[Theta]]^2)/(  TR[r, \[Theta]] R2[r, \[Theta]] Sin[\[Theta]]^2);  gUrr[r_, \[Theta]_] := TR[r, \[Theta]]/R2[r, \[Theta]];  gU\[Theta]\[Theta][r_, \[Theta]_] := 1/R2[r, \[Theta]]; M = 1; n = 4; glo = FullSimplify[{ {gtt[r, \[Theta]], 0, 0,       gt\[Phi][r, \[Theta]]}, {0, grr[r, \[Theta]], 0, 0}, {0, 0,       g\[Theta]\[Theta][r, \[Theta]], 0}, {gt\[Phi][r, \[Theta]], 0, 0,       g\[Phi]\[Phi][r, \[Theta]]}}]; gup = FullSimplify[{ {gUtt[r, \[Theta]], 0, 0,       gUt\[Phi][r, \[Theta]]}, {0, gUrr[r, \[Theta]], 0, 0}, {0, 0,       gU\[Theta]\[Theta][r, \[Theta]], 0}, {gUt\[Phi][r, \[Theta]], 0,       0, gU\[Phi]\[Phi][r, \[Theta]]}}];   dglo = Simplify[Det[glo]];  crd = {t, r, \[Theta], \[Phi]};  Xup = {t[\[Tau]], r[\[Tau]], \[Theta][\[Tau]], \[Phi][\[Tau]]}; Vup = {Vt, Vr, V\[Theta], V\[Phi]}; Pup = {Pt[\[Tau]], Pr[\[Tau]], P\[Theta][\[Tau]], P\[Phi][\[Tau]]};  Sup = {{Stt[\[Tau]], Str[\[Tau]], St\[Theta][\[Tau]],      St\[Phi][\[Tau]]},     {Srt[\[Tau]], Srr[\[Tau]], Sr\[Theta][\[Tau]], Sr\[Phi][\[Tau]]},    {S\[Theta]t[\[Tau]], S\[Theta]r[\[Tau]], S\[Theta]\[Theta][\[Tau]],      S\[Theta]\[Phi][\[Tau]]},    {S\[Phi]t[\[Tau]], S\[Phi]r[\[Tau]], S\[Phi]\[Theta][\[Tau]],      S\[Phi]\[Phi][\[Tau]]}};   christoffel =    Table[(1/2)*     Sum[(gup[[i, s]])*(D[glo[[s, k]], crd[[j]] ] +          D[glo[[s, j]], crd[[k]] ] - D[glo[[j, k]], crd[[s]] ]), {s, 1,        n}], {i, 1, n}, {j, 1, n}, {k, 1, n}] ;   riemann =   Table[ D[christoffel[[i, j, l]], crd[[k]] ] -      D[christoffel[[i, j, k]], crd[[l]] ] +      Sum[christoffel[[s, j, l]] christoffel[[i, k, s]] -        christoffel[[s, j, k]] christoffel[[i, l, s]],      {s, 1, n}], {i, 1, n}, {j, 1, n}, {k, 1, n}, {l, 1, n}] ;   loriemann =    Table[Sum[glo[[i, m]]*riemann[[m, j, k, l]], {m, 1, n}], {i, 1,      n}, {j, 1, n}, {k, 1, n}, {l, 1, n}] ;   EOM1 = Table[ D[Xup[[a]], \[Tau]] == Vup[[a]] , {a, 1, n}];    EOM2 = Table[     D[Pup[[a]], \[Tau]] + \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(b = 1\), \(n\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(c =           1\), \(n\)]christoffel[\([\)\(a, b, c\)\(]\)]*         Pup[\([\)\(b\)\(]\)]*Vup[\([\)\(c\)\(]\)]\)\) == -(1/2) \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(b = 1\), \(n\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(c = 1\), \(n\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(d = 1\), \(n\)]riemann[\([\)\(a,            b, c, d\)\(]\)]*Vup[\([\)\(b\)\(]\)]*          Sup[\([\)\(c, d\)\(]\)]\)\)\),    {a, 1, n}];  EOM3 = Table[     D[Sup[[a, b]], \[Tau]] + \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(c = 1\), \(n\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(d =           1\), \(n\)]christoffel[\([\)\(a, c, d\)\(]\)]*         Sup[\([\)\(c, b\)\(]\)]*Vup[\([\)\(d\)\(]\)]\)\) + \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(c = 1\), \(n\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(d =           1\), \(n\)]christoffel[\([\)\(b, c, d\)\(]\)]*         Sup[\([\)\(a, c\)\(]\)]*Vup[\([\)\(d\)\(]\)]\)\) ==      Pup[[a]]*Vup[[b]] - Pup[[b]]*Vup[[a]],    {a, 1, n}, {b, 1, n}];    Wfactor = 4*\[Mu]^2 + \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(i = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(j = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(k = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(l =           1\), \(4\)]\((loriemann[\([\)\(i, j, k,            l\)\(]\)]*\((Sup[\([\)\(i, j\)\(]\)])\)*\ \((Sup[\([\)\(k,             l\)\(]\)])\))\)\)\)\)\);  Wvec = Table[2/(\[Mu]*Wfactor)*(\!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(i = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(k = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(m = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(l = 1\), \(4\)]Sup[\([\)\(j,             i\)\(]\)]*           Pup[\([\)\(k\)\(]\)]*\((loriemann[\([\)\(i, k, l,              m\)\(]\)])\)*\((Sup[\([\)\(l, m\)\(]\)])\)\)\)\)\)), {j,      1, n}];   NN = 1/Sqrt[1 - \!\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(i = 1\), \(4\)]\( \*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(k =         1\), \(4\)]\((glo[\([\)\(i, k\)\(]\)])\)*Wvec[\([\)\(i\)\(]\)]*       Wvec[\([\)\(k\)\(]\)]\)\)];   {Vt, Vr, V\[Theta], V\[Phi]} = NN (Wvec + Pup);  EOM = Flatten[    Join[{EOM1, EOM2, EOM3} /.          r -> r[\[Tau]] /. \[Theta] -> \[Theta][\[Tau]] /.        Derivative[1][r[\[Tau]]][\[Tau]] -> Derivative[1][r][\[Tau]] /.       Derivative[1][\[Theta][\[Tau]]][\[Tau]] ->        Derivative[1][\[Theta]][\[Tau]]]];  INT1 = {t[0] == 0,     r[0] == r0, \[Theta][0] == \[Theta]0, \[Phi][0] == 0}; INT2 = {Pt[0] == 1.32288, Pr[0] == 0, P\[Theta][0] == 0,     P\[Phi][0] == 0.07143}; INT3 = {{Stt[0] == 0, Str[0] == 0, St\[Theta][0] == 0,      St\[Phi][0] == 0},     {Srt[0] == 0, Srr[0] == 0, Sr\[Theta][0] == 0, Sr\[Phi][0] == 0},    {S\[Theta]t[0] == 0, S\[Theta]r[0] == 0, S\[Theta]\[Theta][0] == 0,      S\[Theta]\[Phi][0] == 0},    {S\[Phi]t[0] == 0, S\[Phi]r[0] == 0, S\[Phi]\[Theta][0] == 0,      S\[Phi]\[Phi][0] == 0}}; INT = Flatten[Join[{INT1, INT2, INT3}]]; r0 = 7; \[Theta]0 = Pi/2; \[Mu] = 1; aa = 0.5; M = 1;  NDSolve[Flatten[Join[{EOM, INT}]], {t, r, \[Theta], \[Phi], Pt, Pr,    P\[Theta], P\[Phi], Stt, Str, St\[Theta], St\[Phi], Srt, Srr,    Sr\[Theta], Sr\[Phi],   S\[Theta]t, S\[Theta]r, S\[Theta]\[Theta], S\[Theta]\[Phi],    S\[Phi]t, S\[Phi]r, S\[Phi]\[Theta], S\[Phi]\[Phi]}, {\[Tau], 0,    1000}] 

Specifics of Time Stop

This question concerns this sentence in the spell’s description:

This spell ends if one of the Actions you use during this period, or any Effects that you create during this period, affects a creature other than you or an object being worn or carried by someone other than you.

When exactly does the spell end? Before the action/effect affects the creature or after?

Here is the specific situation I am thinking about:

Alice is attempting to steal an object off of Bob’s person. Alice casts Time Stop and begins to go through Bob’s pockets to find the object. Can Alice use her action to search Bob, find/take the object, and use their movement to run away before the spell ends?

Would this be valid according to the language of the spell? If not, what is the correct way to resolve this?